Journals / Tekstil Maraton / 2006 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 84

Evaluation of enzymatic cotton scouring as an alternative to conventional alkaline scouring

Klasik bazik işleme bir alternatif olarak pamuğun enzimatik yöntem ile hidrofilleştirilmesinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
48–54
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The kinds of enzymes were crucial rather than the total concentration and the stages of the process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research, various bioscouring processes were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Enzymatic desizing and scourings were applied in one and two stages treatments by using different enzyme combinations and concentrations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The kinds of enzymes were crucial rather than the total concentration and the stages of the process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this research, various bioscouring processes were evaluated. Enzymatic desizing and scourings were applied in one and two stages treatments by using different enzyme combinations and concentrations. Amylase, amylase/lipase combination, alkaline pectinase, neutral cellulose and acidic cellulase were used by considering the compatibility with the working conditions. Both the enzymes were evaluated in terms of desizing and scouring efficiency and enzymatic processes were compared to conventional alkaline scourings. Alkaline pectinase was the most effective enzyme in scouring. The kinds of enzymes were crucial rather than the total concentration and the stages of the process.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, çeşitli enzimatik hidrofilleştirme işlemleri değerlendirilmiştir. Enzimatik haşıl sökme ve hidrofilleştirme işlemleri, tek ve iki banyolu olarak farklı enzim kombinasyonları ve konsantrasyonları ile yapılmıştır. Çalışma koşullarına uyumları dikkate alınarak amilaz, amilazAipaz kombinasyonu, alkali pektinaz, nötral selülaz ve asidik selülaz enzimleri kullanılmışlardır. Hem enzimler haşıl sökme ve hidrofilleştirme etkinliği açısından değerlendirilmiş, hem de enzimatik işlemler klasik bazik işlemler ile kıyaslanmışlardır. Hidrofilleştirmede alkali pektinazın en etkili enzim olduğu görülmüştür. Enzimatik işlemlerde banyo sayısı ve toplam enzim konsantrasyonundan çok enzimlerin cinsi önem taşımaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

İŞMAL, E., ÇOBAN, S. (2006). Evaluation of enzymatic cotton scouring as an alternative to conventional alkaline scouring. Tekstil Maraton, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 84, 48–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/360849

References (1)

  1. Buchert, J., Pere, J., Puolakka, A. and Nousiainen, P., Textile Chemist and Colorist and American Dyestuff Reporter, Vol.32, May 2000, s 48-52. 2.Csiszar, E., Szakacs, G. and Rusznak, I., Textile Research Journal, Vol.68, March 1998, s 163-167. 3.Etters, J.N., Husain, P.A. and Lange, N.K., Textile Asia, Vol. 5, Mayl999, s 83-85. 4.Hartzell, M.M and Hsieh, Y., Textile Research Journal, Vol.68, April 1998, s 233- 241. 5.Lange, N.K., Textile Chemist and Colorist, Vol.29, June 1997, s 23-26. 6.Lawson, M.H, and Durrant, S.K., Textile Chemist and Colorist and American Dyestuff Reporter, Vol.32, August 2000, s 86-90. 7.Lin, C.H. and Hsieh, Y.L., Textile Research journal, Vol. 71, May 2001, s 425-434. 8.Li, Y. and Hardin, I.R., Textile Chemist and Colorist, Vol.29, August 1997, pp71- 76. 9.Li,Y.H. and Hardin, I. R., Textile Chemist and Colorist, Vol.30, September 1998, s 23- 28. 10.Li, Y.H. and Hardin, I.R., Textile Research Journal, Vol.68, September 1998, s 671-679. 11.Rössner, U., Melliand Textilberichte, Vol. 74, December 1993, s 144-148. 12.Sawada, K. Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 89, January, s 263-269. 13.Takagishi, T., Yamamoto, K., Kikuyama, K. and Arakawa, H., Textile Chemist and Colorist and American Dyestuff Reporter Review, Vol.33 August 2001, s 32-34. 14.Traore, M.K. and Buschle-Diller, G., Textile Chemist and Colorist and American Dyestuff Reporter, V6L32, December 2000, s 40-43. 15.Yachmenev, V.G., Blanchard, E.J. and Lambert A.H., Textile Chemist and Colorist and American Dyestuff Reporter, Vol.1, September 1999, s 47-51.