Journals / Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 0

Effect of Micronutrients (Fe, Zn, B and Mn) on Quality Criteria of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)

Mikro Elementlerin (Fe, Zn, B ve Mn), Şekerpancarında (Beta vulgaris L.) Kalite Kriterleri Üzerine Etkisi

Pages
71–76
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings showed that sugar percentage, amount of K, Na, N, alkalinity,crystallized sugar percentage, sugar yield and percentage of sugar in molasses were between 1548-15.4817.77%, 6.65-7.86 (meq/100 g pulp), 1.30-1.95 (meq/100 g pulp), 1.34-7.95 (meq/100 g pulp), alkalinity 3.127.95, 12.32-13.81%, 77.72-79.59% and %3.25-3.95% respectively

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In order to increase sugarbeet competitiveness it is necessarry to consider many things.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Micronutrients such as environmental factors can affect the yield and quality inplants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings showed that sugar percentage, amount of K, Na, N, alkalinity,crystallized sugar percentage, sugar yield and percentage of sugar in molasses were between 1548-15.4817.77%, 6.65-7.86 (meq/100 g pulp), 1.30-1.95 (meq/100 g pulp), 1.34-7.95 (meq/100 g pulp), alkalinity 3.127.95, 12.32-13.81%, 77.72-79.59% and %3.25-3.95% respectively
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005-2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In order to increase sugarbeet competitiveness it is necessarry to consider many things. It is not possibleto crystalyze all sugar in sugarbeet. Some characteristics of sugarbeet that determine the quality of sugarbeetare non-sugar substances. Micronutrients such as environmental factors can affect the yield and quality inplants. The aim of the study was to find the effects of micronutrients (Fe, Zn, B and Mn) on quality of sugarbeet.The study was carried out during 2005-2006 at the agricultural lands of Sulduz region (most important regionin terms of sugarbeet production), West Azerbayjan Province, Iran affiliated to the Sugarbeet Factory of theregion using randomized complete block design with four replications. The sugar percentage and the amountsof Na, K and N were analysed by Betalyser System (Sucromat automatic Saccharometer, flame photometerand testamin photometer). Crystallized sugar percentage, alkalinity, the precentage of sugar in molasses andsugar yield were also determined. The findings showed that sugar percentage, amount of K, Na, N, alkalinity,crystallized sugar percentage, sugar yield and percentage of sugar in molasses were between 1548-15.4817.77%, 6.65-7.86 (meq/100 g pulp), 1.30-1.95 (meq/100 g pulp), 1.34-7.95 (meq/100 g pulp), alkalinity 3.127.95, 12.32-13.81%, 77.72-79.59% and %3.25-3.95% respectively

Özet

Şekerpancarının (Beta vulgaris L.) rekabet gücünü artırmak amacıyla bir hayli yol alınmıştır. Şekerüretiminde pancarda bulunan şekerin tamamı kristalize edilememektedir. Şekerpancarı kalitesini tanımlayanbazı özellikler arasında şeker dışı maddeler şeker kristalizasyonunu etkiler. Mikro elementler, bitkileri kaliteve verim açısından etkilemektedir. Bu denemede kullanılan mikro elementlerin (Fe, Zn, B ve Mn),şekerpancarında kalite kriterleri üzerine olan etkisi araştırılmıştır. Bu araştırma 2005-2006 yıllarında İran'ınşekerpancarı açısından önemli bölgelerinden biri olan Batı Azerbaycan'ın Sulduz bölgesinde bulunanşekerpancarı fabrikasında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre, 4 tekerrürlüolarak kurulmuştur. Örneklerdeki şeker oranı, Na, K ve N miktarları Betalyser Sistemi (Sucromat otomatiksakkarimetre, alev fotometre ve testamin fotometre) kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bu sonuçlardan bilgisayarprogramı yardımıyla kristalize edilebilen şeker miktarı, alkalinite ve melastaki şeker oranı belirlenmiştir. Eldeedilen bulgulara göre; şeker oranı %15.48-17.77, K varlığı 6.65-7.86 (meq/100 g pulp), Na varlığı 1.30-1.95(meq/100 g pulp), N varlığı 1.34-7.95 (meq/100 g pulp), alkalinite 3.12-7.95, kristalize edilebilen şeker oranı%12.32-13.81, şeker randımanı %77.72-79.59 ve melastaki şeker oranı %3.25-3.95 arasında değişmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

RAHİMİ, A., ARSLAN, N., ESMZAD, S. (2016). Effect of Micronutrients (Fe, Zn, B and Mn) on Quality Criteria of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 0, 71–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/360563

References (8)

  1. Aghaalinejad M., 2011. Florsitic Evaluation of Plant Diversity in Naghadeh (Sulduz). A thesis in biology branch, Marand Islamic University. Marand, Iran. (Farsça) Alexander J.T., 1971. Factors Affecting Quality. P: 371-381.
  2. In Johnson RT, Alexander JT, Rush GE, (Editör: Hawkes G.R.). Advances in sugar beet production; Principles and practices. The Iowa State Univ. Press. Ames.IA Bakırcıoğlu D.Ç, 2009. Toprakta Makro ve Mikro Element Tayini. Doktora Tezi, Trakya Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Kimya Bölümü Çamaş N., Çırak C. and Albayrak S., 2007. Yield and quality of sugarbeet growen under northern Turkey condition. Int. J. of Agricultural Reserch, 2(3): 296-301 Çimrin K.M. ve Boysan S., 2006. Van yöresi tarım topraklarının besin elementi durumları ve bunların bazı toprak özellikleri ile ilişkileri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi,
  3. Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 16:105-111
  4. Draycott A.P., Christenson D.R., 2003. Nutrients for sugar beet production: Soil-plant relationships. CABI Publishing FAO, 2009. How to feed the world 2050. Global agriculture towards 2050.
  5. High Level Expert Forum, Rome, 12-13 October 2009
  6. Farzaneh S., Sadeghzadeh S., Fathollah Taleghani D., Cheghini M.A., Ghaderifar F. and Fresco L.O., 2004. Fertilizer and the Future. FAO Agricultur Department. www.fao.org Gobarah M.E., Tawfik M.M., Zaghloul S.M. and Amin Gehan A., 2014. Effect of combined application of different micronutrients on productivity and quality of sugar beet plants (Beta vulgaris L.), International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 3(6): 589-598
  7. Gobarah M.E., Mekki B.B., Mohamed M.H. and Tawfik M.M., 2011. Comparative efficiency of foliar and soil potassium application on sugarbeet productivity and quality. AmericanEurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 10 (4): 626- 632 Hilde D.J., Bass S.R., Levos S. and Ellingson R.L., 1983. Grower practices system promotes beet quality improvment in the Red River Valley. J. Am. Soc. Sugar beet Technol., 22: 73-88 Hu H. and Brown P.H., 1997. Absorption of boron by plant roots. Plant and soil.193: 49-58
  8. Jaliliyan A., Shirvani A.R., Nemati A. and Basati J., 2001. Effects of deficit irrigation on the production and economy of sugarbeet in Kermanshah region. J. of Sugarbeet, 17: 1- 14. (Farsça) Malakooti M.G. and Tehrani MM, 2001. Micronutrients roll in maximizing crop yield and improving qualitative of agricultural products. Tarbiat Modarres University. (In Persian) Nourju A. and Baghayikiya M., 2004. Study on the irrigation scheduling e