Journals / Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Orta Anadolu Bölgesine Ait İki Merada Mera Durumu, Sağlığı ve Biyoçeşitlilikle İlgili Değerlendirmeler

Rangeland Condition, Health and Biodiversity Assessments for Two Rangeland Vegetations in the Central Anatolia Region

Pages
48–57
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a results it is suggested that proper management and improvement techniques should be conducted for both village rangelands.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Improvement and management of rangelands are highly important to sustain and maintain for nowadays and next generations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this reason vegetation surveys were performed on the rangelands of Kırıkkale-Akçaağaç village and SivasÇelebiler village in 2008.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a results it is suggested that proper management and improvement techniques should be conducted for both village rangelands.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Improvement and management of rangelands are highly important to sustain and maintain for nowadays and next generations. The first step in vegetation studies is to determine its current vegetation status. For this reason vegetation surveys were performed on the rangelands of Kırıkkale-Akçaağaç village and SivasÇelebiler village in 2008. A modified wheel point method was used for vegetation survey. The results of research indicated that vegetation cover and bare ground were found as 47.10% and 52.90%; 69.43% and 30.57% in Akçakavak (21 survey sites) and Çelebiler (22 survey sites), respectively. The rangeland health class was found unhealthy and risky for rangeland in Akçakavak and Çelebiler, respectively. The 73 species in Akçakavak and 179 species in Çelebiler were counted on rangeland vegetation community. Desired plant species were also found in a satisfactory level for rehabilitation of rangelands. Simpsons’ index of diversity was calculated to evaluate biological diversity of rangelands vegetation. Vegetation biodiversity was higher in rangelands of Çelebiler than that of Akçakavak. As a results it is suggested that proper management and improvement techniques should be conducted for both village rangelands.

Özet

Meraların yönetimi ve iyileştirilmesi, günümüz ve gelecek nesiller için sürdürülmesi ve korunması oldukça önemlidir. Mera çalışmalarının birinci basamağı mevcut mera durumunun belirlenmesidir. Bu nedenle 2008 yılında Kırıkkale - Akçaağaç ve Sivas - Çelebiler köylerinde mera vejetasyon etüdleri yapılmıştır. Modifiye edilmiş tekerlekli nokta metodu vejetasyon etüdlerinde kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları Akçakavak'ta (21 etüd noktası) ve Çelebiler'de (22 etüd noktası) bitki ile kaplı alan ve çıplak alan oranının sırayla %47.10 ve %52.9 ; %69.43 ve %30.57 olduğu görülmüştür. Mera sağlık durumu Akçakavak'ta sorunlu Çelebiler'de riskli olarak bulunmuştur. Akçakavak mera vejetasyonunda 73 tür, Çelebiler'de 179 tür sayılmıştır. Mera ıslahı için istenen bitki türleri yeterli düzeyde bulunmuştur. Mera vejetasyonlarının biyolojik çeşitliliğini değerlendirmek üzere Simpson ideksi hesap edilmiştir. Çelebiler meralarının vejetasyon biyoçeşitlilik değeri Akçakavak'tan daha yüksek olmuştur. Sonuç olarak iki köy merasında uygun yönetim ve ıslah teknikleri uygulanması önerilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, S., MERMER, A., YILDIZ, H., MUTLU, Z. (2016). Orta Anadolu Bölgesine Ait İki Merada Mera Durumu, Sağlığı ve Biyoçeşitlilikle İlgili Değerlendirmeler. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 48–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/360559

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Allan B. and Lowther B., 1992. Pasture grazing management. Guide to Tussock Grassland Farming (Editor: Mike Floate). AgReseach, Invermay, New Zealand Pastoral Agriculture Research Institute Ltd. Mosgiel, New Zealand Altın M., 1999. Fertilizer Applications on Meadow and Rangeland. Training and Application Handbook of Range Act. 1. The Turkish Ministry of Agricultural And Rural Affairs. General Director of Agricultural Production and Development Anonymous, 1991. Threats to biodiversity in the United States. U.S. Environ. Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Anonymous, 2005. Meadow and Range Plants Handbook. The General Directorate of Agricultural Production and Improvement, The Turkish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, page: 317 Anonymous, 2009. The challenge of the rangelands in Turkey (Towards a sustainable rangeland economy). Government to government project G2G07/TR/9/3 Turkey – The Netherlands, Final report of the G2G project: sustainable rangeland management in Turkey, 2008 and 2009, p: 57 Anonymous, 2012. The Result Report of National Rangeland Use and Management Project, project no:106G017. The Scentific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) Support Programme for Research and Improvement Projects of Public Institutions (1007 Programme), Public Research Grant Committee, (Unpublished Report) Anonymous, 2015.
  2. Biodiversity. Measuring biodiversity, Student and Teachers guide www.rewardinglearning.org.uk A2AS-BIOOLREVISED-Support-5925.doc (Access date, 20.12.2015) Bakır Ö., 1969. Studies on the ecological factors affecting growth and improvement of major forage crops. Ankara University, Agricultural Faculty Press, 327. Ankara, page:116 Bakır Ö., 1987. Grazing Period. Management of Meadow and Rangeland. Ankara University, Agricultural Faculty Presses, 992, p: 114- 132 Campbell M., 1997. Pasture weeds. Pasture Production and Management (Editors: J.V. Lovett and J.M. Scott). Reel International Books Australia Pty Ltd trading as Inkata Press, pp. 254-268 Canals R.M. and Sebastia M.T., 2000. Analyzing mechanisms regulating diversity in rangelands through comaparative studies: a case in the South-western Pyrennes. Biodiversity and Conservation, 9: 964-984 Davis P.H., 1965 - 1985. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 1 – 9, Edinburgh Univ. Press., Edinburgh Davis P.H., Mill R.R. and Tan K., 1988. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Edinburgh Univ. Press., (supple. 1), Vol. 10, Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh De Bell