Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Effect of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Corneal Biomechanical Characteristics

Pages
33–36
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Short-term hyperglycemia does not affect the corneal biomechanical parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects the corneal biomechanical parameters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material-Method: Thirty-eight pregnant women, newly diagnosed with GDM and, age- and gestational age-matched 34 healthy pregnant females were enrolled in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Short-term hyperglycemia does not affect the corneal biomechanical parameters.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:gestational diabetes mellitus · corneal biomechanics

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects the corneal biomechanical parameters. Material-Method: Thirty-eight pregnant women, newly diagnosed with GDM and, age- and gestational age-matched 34 healthy pregnant females were enrolled in the study. The right eye of the participants was examined. The corneal parameters including corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and the corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), obtained by The Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) device were compared statistically. Results: The mean and gestational age of the participants was 30.71 ±5.09 years, 25.95 ±1.56 weeks and 29.97 ±4.10 years, 25.76 ±1.30 weeks in pregnant females with GDM and healthy pregnant females, respectively. No significant differences in age (p=0.502) or gestational age (p=0.594) were noted. The values of CH, CRF, IOPg, and IOPcc were determined to be higher in pregnant females with GDM as compared to that in healthy pregnant females. However, there was no statistically significant difference in any other parameter (p=0.183, p=0.303, p=0.732 and p=0.330, respectively). Conclusions: Short-term hyperglycemia does not affect the corneal biomechanical parameters.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAN, S., ACAR, U., KARAIBRAHIMOGLU, A., İNANÇ, M., KIZILGÜL, M., BEYSEL, S., ÇAKAL, E. (2020). Effect of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Corneal Biomechanical Characteristics. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 33–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/360467

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Shih KC, Lam KS, Tong L. A systematic review on the impact of diabetes mellitus on the ocular surface. Nutr Diabetes. 2017;7 (3):e251
  2. Misra SL, Braatvedt GD, Patel DV. Impact of diabetes mellitus on the ocular surface: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44 (4):278–88
  3. Rehany U, Ishii Y, Lahav M, Rumelt S. Ultrastructural changes in corneas of diabetic patients: an electron-microscopy study. Cornea. 2000;19 (4):534–8
  4. Stitt AW. The maillard reaction in eye diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1043:582–97
  5. Kaji Y, Usui T, Oshika T, Matsubara M, Yamashita H, Araie M, et al. Advanced glycation end products in diabetic corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41 (2):362–8
  6. Sady C, Khosrof S, Nagaraj R. Advanced Maillard reaction and crosslinking of corneal collagen in diabetes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;214 (3):793–7
  7. Hager A, Wegscheider K, Wiegand W. Changes of extracellular matrix of the cornea in diabetes mellitus. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247 (10):1369–74
  8. Ramm L, Herber R, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE, Terai N. Measurement of corneal biomechanical properties in diabetes mellitus using the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST. Cornea. 2019; 38 (5):595–9
  9. Pérez-Rico C, Gutiérrez-Ortíz C, González-Mesa A, Zandueta AM, Moreno-Salgueiro A, Germain F. Effect of diabetes mellitus on Corvis ST measurement process. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93 (3):e193–8
  10. Scheler A, Spoerl E, Boehm AG. Effect of diabetes mellitus on corneal biomechanics and measurement of intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90 (6):e447–51
  11. Kotecha A, Oddone F, Sinapis C, Elsheikh A, Sinapis D, Sinapis A, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal biomechanical characteristics in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36 (11):1822–8
  12. Bekmez S, Kocaturk T. Higher Intraocular pressure levels associated with lower hysteresis in type 2 diabetes. Open Ophthalmol J. 2018;12:29–33
  13. Yazgan S, Celik U, Kaldırım H, Ayar O, Elbay A, Aykut V, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between corneal biomechanic and HbA1C levels in type 2 diabetes patients. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1549–53
  14. Sahin A, Bayer A, Ozge G, Mumcuoğlu T. Corneal biomechanical changes in diabetes mellitus and their influence on intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50 (10):4597–604
  15. Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Rasko A, Morad Y, Harstein M, et al. Effect of diabetes mellitus on biomechanical parameters of the cornea. J Cataract Refra