Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Techniques of the temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: Literature review

Temporomandibuler eklem artrosentez teknikleri: Literatür derlemesi

Pages
114–117
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this present article, our aim is try to give answers following questions: “What are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods?” What can be done to clarify the advantages and disadvantages? “ Keywords: Arthrocenthesis, Temporomandibular joint.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Arthrocenthesis which is used to treat temporomandibular joint disorders, is a low cost, minimal invasive procedure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to make this minimal invasive procedure more less invasive, lots of methods and techniques are described in the literature recent years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this present article, our aim is try to give answers following questions: “What are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods?” What can be done to clarify the advantages and disadvantages? “ Keywords: Arthrocenthesis, Temporomandibular joint.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Artrosentez · Temporomandibuler eklem · Arthrocenthesis

Abstract

Arthrocenthesis which is used to treat temporomandibular joint disorders, is a low cost, minimal invasive procedure. In order to make this minimal invasive procedure more less invasive, lots of methods and techniques are described in the literature recent years. In this present article, our aim is try to give answers following questions: “What are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods?” What can be done to clarify the advantages and disadvantages? “ Keywords: Arthrocenthesis, Temporomandibular joint.

Özet

Artrosentez temporomandibuler eklem rahatsızlıklarının tedavisinde kullanılan, düşük maliyetli minimal invaziv bir tedavi protokolüdür. Bu minimal invaziv protokolü daha da az invaziv hale getirebilmek adına son yıllarda literatürde birçok teknik ve yöntemden bahsedilmiştir. Bu derlemenin amacı “Bu yöntemlerin avantaj ve dezavantajları nelerdir?” “Avantaj ve dezavantajların daha iyi belirlenebilmesi için neler yapılabilir?” gibi sorulara yanıt bulmaktır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Artrosentez, Temporomandibuler eklem.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENTÜRK, M. F. (2014). Techniques of the temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: Literature review. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 114–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/360441

References (8)

  1. Murakami KI, Matsuka M, Iizuka T, Ono, T. Recapturing the persistent anteriorly displaced disk by maniplation after pumping and hydraulic pressure to the upper joint cavity of the temporomandibular joint. J Craniomandib Pract 1987; 5: 17-24.
  2. Nitzan DW, Dolwick MF, Martinez GF. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: A simplified treatment for severe, limited mouth opening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991; 49: 1163-1167. 3. Önder ME, Tüz HH, Koçyiğit D, Kişnişçi RŞ. Long-term results of arthrocentesis in degenerative temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107: e1-e5. Al Belasy FA, Dolwick MF. Arthrocentesis for the treatment of temporomandibular joint closed lock: a review article. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36: 773-782.
  3. Honda K, Yasukawa Y, Fujiwara M, Abe T, Urade M. Causes of persistent joint pain after arthrocentesis of temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 2311-2315.
  4. Frost DE, Kendell BD. The use of arthrocentesis for treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999; 57: 583-587. Dolwick MF. The role of temporomandibular joint surgery in the treatment of patients with internal derangement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radio Endod. 1997; 83:150. Nitzan DW, Marmary Y. The “Anchored Disc Phenomenon”: A proposed etiology for sudden-onset, sever and persistent closed lock of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997; 55: 797-802. Nitzan DW. Temporomandibular joint “Open lock” versus condylar dislocation: signs and symptoms, imaging, treatment and pathogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 60: 506-511. 11. Nitzan DW. Arthrocentesis-incentives for using this minimally invasive approach for temporomandibular disorders. Oral Maxillofac Surg. Clin North Am 2006; 18: 311–328.
  5. Guo C, Shi Z, Revington P. Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis and lavage. Evidence Based Dentistry 2009; 10: 110. Carroll TA, Smith K, Jakubovski J. Extradural haematoma following temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis and lavage. Br J Neurosurg. 2000; 14: 152-154.
  6. Goudot P, Jaquinet AR, Hugonnet S, Haefliger W, Richter M. Improvement of pain and function after arthroscopy and arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint: a comparative study. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 28: 39-43.
  7. Efeoğlu C, Koca H, Sipahi Çalış A. Temporomandibuler eklem artrosentezinin ilginç bir komplikasyonu: Olgu sunumu. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2010; 13: 63-66.
  8. Etöz OA, Er N, Alkan A. Accid