Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Fecal incontinence and nursing approach

Fekal inkontinans ve hemşirelik yaklaşımı

Pages
39–44
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review is to investigate the causes of fecal incontinence, risk factors, current diagnosis and identify the responsibilities and roles of nurses who take active roles at every stage of treatment of the disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fecal incontinence (FI ), involuntary loss of feces state solid or liquid.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fecal incontinence, which affects millions of women worldwide, is a pathological condition that not only affects the individual physically but also affects both socially, psychologically and economically.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review is to investigate the causes of fecal incontinence, risk factors, current diagnosis and identify the responsibilities and roles of nurses who take active roles at every stage of treatment of the disease.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fekal inkontinans · yaşam kalitesi · hemşirelik yaklaşımı

Abstract

Fecal incontinence (FI ), involuntary loss of feces state solid or liquid. Fecal incontinence, which affects millions of women worldwide, is a pathological condition that not only affects the individual physically but also affects both socially, psychologically and economically. Individuals with fecal incontinence live in social isolation. The actual prevalence of the disease is not known definitely because individuals with the disorder do not express it because of their feelings of embarrassment. It is difficult for the individuals with the disease to express the complaints of fecal incontinence because of their feelings of embarrassment and frustration. Due to the fact that fecal incontinence is seen as a taboo in the society, important roles and responsibilities fall on nurses in identifying and evaluating the problem. The aim of this review is to investigate the causes of fecal incontinence, risk factors, current diagnosis and identify the responsibilities and roles of nurses who take active roles at every stage of treatment of the disease.

Özet

Fekal inkontinans (Fİ), katı veya sıvı haldeki feçesin istemsiz kaçırılmasıdır. Dünya’da milyonlarca kadını etkileyen Fİ bireyi yalnızca fiziksel olarak değil, aynı zamanda sosyal, psikolojik ve ekonomik olarak da olumsuz etkileyen patolojik bir durumdur. Fİ, birey için açıklanması güç, utanç verici bir durum olarak görülebilmektedir. Bireyler sık sık tuvalete gitme korkuları olduğundan oldukça kısıtlı bir sosyal hayat yaşar. Fekal inkontinanslı bireyler sosyal izolasyon yaşar. Fekal inkontinans toplumda bir tabu olarak görülmesi sebebiyle sorunun saptanması ve değerlendirilmesinde hemşirelere önemli rol ve sorumluluklar düşmektedir. Literatürde fekal inkontinansın tanı ve tedavi yöntemleri ile ilgili birçok kaynak bulunmaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı, fekal inkontinansın nedenlerini, risk faktörlerini, güncel tanı ve tedavi yöntemlerini incelemek ve hastalığın tedavisinde her aşamasında aktif rol alan hemşirelerin sorumluluklarını ve rollerini belirtmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, B. Ç., ASLAN, E. (2018). Fecal incontinence and nursing approach. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 39–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/360364

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Sultan AH, Monga A, Lee J, Emmanuel A, Norton C, Santoro G, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/ International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female anorectal dysfunction. Neurourology and Urodynamics 2017; 36(1): 10-34. 2.Dedeli Ö, Fadıloğlu Ç, Turan İ, Bor S. İzmir Huzurevlerindeki Yaşlılarda Fekal İnkontinans Sıklığı ve Yaşam Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisi. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics 2008; 11(1): 33-41. 3.Bavel J, Hukkelhoven CW, Vries C, Papatsonis DN, Vogel J, Roovers JPW et al. The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: A ten-year analysis of a national registry. International Urogynecology Journal 2017; 1433-3023: 1-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3422-4. 4.Meyer I, Richter HE. An evidence-based approach to the evaluation, diagnostic assessment, and treatment of fecal incontinence in women. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports 2014; 3(3): 155-164. 5.Sharma A, Yuan L, Marshall R J, Merrie AEH, Bissett IP. Systematic review of the prevalence of faecal incontinence. British Journal of Surgery 2016; 103: 1589–1597. 6.Canda AE, Terzi C. Anorektal Fizyoloji ve Tanı Yöntemleri. İçinde: Anorektal Bölgenin Selim Hastalıkları, editörler: Menteş B, Bulut T, Alabaz Ö, Lenetoğlu S. Ankara, Miki Matbaacılık Bas. Yay. Ltd. Şti., 2011; s:17-32. 7.Benezech A, Desmazes-Dufeu N, Baumstarck K, Bouvier M, Coltey B, Reynaud-Gaubert M. Prevalence of fecal incontinence in adults with cystic fibrosis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2017;1-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4825-2. 8.Wu JM, Matthews CA, Vaughan CP, & Markland AD. Urinary, fecal, and dual incontinence in older US adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2015; 63(5): 947-953. 9.Serrano Falcón B, Álvarez Sánchez Á, Diaz-Rubio M, Rey, E. Prevalence and factors associated with faecal impaction in the Spanish old population. Age and Ageing 2017; 46(1): 119-124. 10.Rudolph W, Galandiuk S. A practical guide to the diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2002; 77(3): 271-275. 11.Fowles J, Routh K, Ward D, Simpson S. New and emerging technologies for urinary and faecal incontinence. United Kingdom University of Birmingham, 2014; p. 19-20. 12.Fattorini E, Brusa T, Gingert C, Hieber SE, Leung V, Osmani B et al. Artificial muscle devices: Innovations and prospects for fecal incontinence treatment. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2016; 44(5): 1355-1