Journals / Technology / 2001 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

A comparison of the air permeability performances of the prefabricated concrete panels with and without joint

Derzli ve derzsiz prefabrike beton panellerin hava geçirimsizlik performanslarının karşılaştırılması

Journal
Technology
Pages
175–179
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides, the importance of the quality control in the process of the concrete preparation of the prefabricated concrete panels has been emphasized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this research; the air tightness of proposed joint in the prefabricated concrete wall panel and prefabricated concrete wall panel without joint are tested in the laboratory according to the performance criteria and methods determined by ISO 6589 and results are compared.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The specific gravity of concrete is found to be lower than the limit value given in TS 825.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, the importance of the quality control in the process of the concrete preparation of the prefabricated concrete panels has been emphasized.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this research; the air tightness of proposed joint in the prefabricated concrete wall panel and prefabricated concrete wall panel without joint are tested in the laboratory according to the performance criteria and methods determined by ISO 6589 and results are compared. At the end of the comparison, the prefabricated concrete panel without joint has been found as more air permeable than the other. Upon this, specific gravity of the concrete has been determined by the test performed on the sample of the prefabricated concrete panel without joint. The specific gravity of concrete is found to be lower than the limit value given in TS 825. In this study; test results about the air tightness of the developed joint in the prefabricated concrete panel and the prefabricated concrete panel without joint are given and compared with each other. In addition, the test results related with the specific gravity of concrete sample of the prefabricated concrete panel without joint are given. Besides, the importance of the quality control in the process of the concrete preparation of the prefabricated concrete panels has been emphasized.

Özet

Bu araştırmada; üzerinde tasarlanmış bir düşey derz (birleşim yeri) bulunduran prefabrike beton panel ile herhangi bir derz içermeyen prefabrike beton panelin hava geçirimsizlik performansları, ISO 6589'da verilen deney yöntemi kullanılarak ölçülmüş ve karşılaştırmaları yapılmıştır. Yapılan karşılaştırma sonucunda; üzerinde derz bulunmayan beton panelin, üzerinde derz bulunan beton panelden daha fazla hava geçirdiği görülmüştür. Bu durum üzerine derzsiz panelin beton yoğunluğu saptanmış ve TS 825 'de verilen standart değerlerden düşük olduğu görülmüştür. Çalışmada; düşey derz içeren beton panel ile derzsiz beton panelin hava geçirimsizlik performansları ve derzsiz beton panelden alınan numunenin yoğunluğunun belirlenmesine yönelik deney sonuçlarına yer verilmiş ve karşılaştırmaları yapılmıştır. Bunlara ilave olarak, prefabrike beton panellerle yapımın beton hazırlama sürecinde kalite kontrolün önemi vurgulanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİREL, F. (2001). A comparison of the air permeability performances of the prefabricated concrete panels with and without joint. Technology, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 175–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/359612

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Demirel, F., Gülgeç, M., Utkutuğ, G., Permeability of Joints in Prefabricated Concrete large External Wall Panels”, 15th International Congress of the Precast Concrete Industry, Paris, pp. 59-64, 1996
  2. Anon., “Joints in Building Laboratory method of test for air permeability of Joints” International Standards, ISO 6589, 1983
  3. Anon., ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals, New York, 1974
  4. Anon., “Fenster, fugendurchlassigkeit, schlagregendichtheit und mechansche beanspruchung anforderungen und prufung German Standards, DIN 18055, 1981
  5. Anon., Meteoroloji Bülteni, Devlet Meteoroloji İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 1974
  6. Anon., Türkiye’nin Yağış – Şiddet – Süre Tekerrür Analizleri. Ankara, 1987
  7. Anon., “Sertleşmiş Betonun Yoğunluk Tayini Betonu”, Türk Standartları, TS 6332, Ankara, 1989
  8. Anon., “Binalarda Isı Yalıtım Kuralları”, Türk Standartları, TS 825, Ankara, 1998.