Journals / Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Measuring Risk and Designing Risk Management Strategies for Dair Enterprise: A Case of Tonya

Süt Sığırcılığı Üretim Dalında Risk Ölçümü ve Risk Yönetimi Stratejileri: Tonya Örneği

Pages
1–15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It seems that the most appropriate risk management strategy for dairy farmers is to supplement their dairy income with off farm income.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this case study, in Tonya district of Trabzon province (Turkey), a model for measuring and designing appropriate risk management strategies for a dairy farmer has been developed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Production and financial risk faced by farms have been measured by using probability distribution function of milk price and yield.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It seems that the most appropriate risk management strategy for dairy farmers is to supplement their dairy income with off farm income.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:tarım ekonomisi · agricultural economics

Abstract

In this case study, in Tonya district of Trabzon province (Turkey), a model for measuring and designing appropriate risk management strategies for a dairy farmer has been developed. Production and financial risk faced by farms have been measured by using probability distribution function of milk price and yield. When comparing risk management strategies, second-degree stochastic dominance (SSD) model has been used. The dairy farms experience large budget deficits due to wide production fluctuations and unfavourable farm gate prices. The dairy farmers have lost almost 6% of their capital investment due to low production in conjunction with low prices, which resulted in low farm income for the year the study was conducted. It was stated in the research that the risk of budget deficit was 57%. Fifty percent was due to low production and low price fluctuations. The rest of the budget deficit was caused by financial rigidities. It seems that the most appropriate risk management strategy for dairy farmers is to supplement their dairy income with off farm income.

Özet

Trabzon İlinin Tonya ilçesinde yapılan bu araştırmada, süt üretimi yapan işletmelerin karşılaştıkları riskin ölçümünü mümkün kılacak ve buna göre izlenebilecek risk stratejisini ortaya koyacak bir model geliştirilmiştir. Süt üretiminde, model işletmenin karşılaştığı faaliyet riski ve mali risk, fiyat ve verim değerlerine ait olasılık dağılım fonksiyonlarından yararlanılarak ölçülmüştür. Risk stratejilerinin karşılaştırılmasında, ikinci dereceden stokastik ihtimali üstünlük modeli kullanılmıştır. İncelenen işletmeler, süt verimi ve fiyatlarındaki dalgalanmaların etkisiyle zaman zaman zor durumda kalmaktadır. Araştırmada incelenen dönemde süt verimi ve fiyatlarının düşük olması, satış gelirlerinde önemli oranda düşmeye sebep olmuş, işletmeler sahip olunan toplam sermayenin yaklaşık %6’sı kadar zarar etmişlerdir. Araştırmada, incelenen işletmelerin işletme masraflarını ve borçlarını karşılayamama riskinin %57 olduğu ve bu riskin %50’sinin faaliyet riskinden, %7’sinin ise mali riskten kaynaklandığı belirlenmiştir. İncelenen işletmelerinin karşılaştıkları riskin azaltılmasında kullanılabilecek en iyi risk yönetim stratejisinin tarım dışı gelir sağlamak olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZOĞLU, M., CEYHAN, V., CİNEMRE, H. A. (2004). Measuring Risk and Designing Risk Management Strategies for Dair Enterprise: A Case of Tonya. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 1–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/358859

References (10)

  1. Anderson, J.R. and Dillon, J.L. 1992. Risk Analysis in Dryland Farming Systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ISBN 92-5-103204-1,
  2. Rome. Argyrous, G.1997. Statistics for Social Research. Mac Millan Press Ltd., p.193-196,
  3. London, UK. Bauer, L. And Bushe, D. 1993. Risk Management: Identifying risk attitudes, identifying risk sources, measuring degrees of risk and designing of risk strategies. Province of British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, University of Alberta and Canada Agriculture, Canadian Catalouguing in Publication Data, ISBN 0-7718-9337,
  4. Canada. Ceyhan, V. 1995. Tarımda Risk İdaresi Stratejileri ve Risk İdaresinde Kooperatifçiliğin Rolü. Karınca Dergisi, Sayı:702, Türk Kooperatifçilik Kurumu, Ankara.
  5. Day, R.H. 1965. Probability Distributions of Field Crop Yields. Journal of Farm Economics, American Farm Economics Association, Volume:47, Wisconsin, USA. Dillon, C.R. 1999. Production Practice Alternatives for Income and Suitable Field Day Risk Management. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 31,2:247-261.
  6. Dun, J.W. and Williams, J.R. 2000. Farm Characteristics that Influence Net Farm Income Variability and Losses. Annual Meeting of Western Agricultural Economics Association, June 29-July 3, Vancouer, Canada. Featherstone, A.M., Moss, C.B., Baker, T.G. and Preckel, P.V.1988. The Theoritical Effects of Farm Policies on Optimal Leverage and The Probablity of Equity Losses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70:572-579.
  7. Hardaker, J.B., Huirne, R.B.M. and Anderson, J.R. 1997. Coping with Risk in Agriculture. CAB International, ISBN 0 85199 119 X, Biddles Ltd., UK. Harwood, J., Heifner, R., Coble, K., Perry, J. and Somwaru, A.1999. Managing Risk in Farming: Concepts, Research and Analysis. Market and Trade Econimics Division and Resource Economics Division, Economic research Service, U.S. Department Holloway, C. 1979. Decision Making under Uncertainity. Models and Choices. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Işık, M. and Khanna, M. 2002.
  8. Stochastic Technology, Risk Preferences and Adoption of Site-Specific Technologies. Annual Meeting of American Agricultural Economics Association, July 28-31,
  9. Long Beach, California. Mahoney, P.R., Olson, K.D. and Porter, P.M. 2001. Risk Analysis of Organic Cropping System in Minnesota. Annual Meeting of American Agricultural Economics Association, August 5-8,
  10. Chicago. Mapp, H.P.Jr., Hardın, M.L., Walker, O.L. and Persand, T. 1979. Analysis o