SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Determination of Parameters That Can Be Criteria to Young Farmer Supports in Turkey: Choice Experiment Method

Türkiye’de Genç Çiftçi Desteklemelerine Kriter Olabilecek Parametrelerin Belirlenmesi: Tercih Deneyi Yöntemi

Duygu BİROL
Halil İbrahim YILMAZ
Halit Ahmet AKDEMİR
FERİT ÇOBANOĞLU
Pages
131–146
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Purpose: This study is an overall assessment of the Young Farmer Projects Support Program (YFPSP); inferences are made in order to reveal opportunities and suggestions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study is an overall assessment of the Young Farmer Projects Support Program (YFPSP); inferences are made in order to reveal opportunities and suggestions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Purpose: This study is an overall assessment of the Young Farmer Projects Support Program (YFPSP); inferences are made in order to reveal opportunities and suggestions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Purpose: This study is an overall assessment of the Young Farmer Projects Support Program (YFPSP); inferences are made in order to reveal opportunities and suggestions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:genç çiftçi · kırsal kalkınma · sürdürülebilirlik

Abstract

Purpose: This study is an overall assessment of the Young Farmer Projects Support Program (YFPSP); inferences are made in order to reveal opportunities and suggestions.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, Genç Çiftçi Projelerini Destekleme Programına (GÇPDP) yeni kriterler belirlemek, üreticilerin farklı senaryolar karşısında kabul etme istekliliğini ölçmek ve önerilerde bulunmak amacıyla yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİROL, D., YILMAZ, H. İ., AKDEMİR, H. A., ÇOBANOĞLU, F. (2020). Determination of Parameters That Can Be Criteria to Young Farmer Supports in Turkey: Choice Experiment Method. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 131–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/358732

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. ADAS. (2004). Entry to and Exit from Farming in the United Kingdom. Prepared for the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. ADAS Consulting Ltd. Altıntaş, G., Altıntaş, A., Oruç, E., Kızılaslan, H., Çakmak, E. and Birol, D., 2020. Genç Çiftçi Proje Desteğinden Yararlanmayı Etkileyen Faktörler; TR-83 Bölgesi Örneği. Türk Ziraat Mühendisleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1): 152-168.
  2. Augere-Granier, M.L. (2015). Supporting Young Farmers in the EU. Briefing June 2015, European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2015) 559504 Erişim: Temmuz, 2017.
  3. Başaranoğlu, C. ve Yılmaz, H. (2020). Genç Çiftçilerin Çiftçilik Yapma Eğilimlerinin ve Çiftçilik Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi: Isparta İli Örneği. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 26(1): 19-28.
  4. Bennett, J. and Birol, E. (2010). Choice Experiments in Developing Countries: Implementation, Challenges and Policy Implications. Edward Elgar Publishing, UK. Bıçkı, D. (2011). Türkiye Kırsalında Yoksulluk Sorunu: Çanakkale Kocalar Köyü Örneği. Uludağ Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1): 161-180.
  5. Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J. and Brown, T.C. (2003). A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Kluwer Academic Press:
  6. Boston. Colombo, S., Hanley, N. and Calatrava-Requena, J. (2005). Designing Policy for Reducing the Off-Farm Effects of Soil Erosion Using Choice Experiments. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(1): 81-95.
  7. Davis, J., Caskie, P. and Wallace, M.(2009). Economics of Farmer Early Retirement Policy. Applied Economics, 41(1): 35-43.
  8. Doğanay, S. ve Alım, M. (2010). Türkiye’de Kırsal Nüfusun Şehir Algısı Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Yeşilyurt Köyü (Trabzon). Eastern Geographical Review, 15(23): 171-184.
  9. EC. (2017). Glossary of Terms related to the Common Agricultural Policy. European Commission, Agriculture and Rural Development, Glossary. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/glossary_en. Erişim: Haziran, 2017.
  10. Greene, W.H. (2008). NLOGIT 4 Student Version, User’s Guide, Econometric Software, Australia. GTHB. (2016). 2016 Yılı Faaliyet Raporu. T.C. Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı, Ankara.
  11. GTHB. (2017). 2016 Yılı Faaliyet Raporu. T.C. Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı, Ankara.
  12. Hanley, N. and Barbier, E.B. (2009). Pricing Nature: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cambridge, UK. Holmes, T.P. and Adamowicz, W.L. (2003).
  13. Attribute-Based Methods, A Primer on Non-Market Valuation. Chapter 6, p.171-219. Kluwer