The second contention of this study is that the EU has been effective in influencing reconstruction and state building process in the Balkan region after the war through its civilian power instruments: namely the accession carrot and economic instruments
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article analyses the EU’s approach towards the Balkan states in the post Cold War era.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It argues that the EU failed to serve a credible military actor to prevent the war, even to act an effective mediator to find feasible settlement in the region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The second contention of this study is that the EU has been effective in influencing reconstruction and state building process in the Balkan region after the war through its civilian power instruments: namely the accession carrot and economic instruments
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Balkan states · Bosnian war · Dayton Agreement
Abstract
This article analyses the EU’s approach towards the Balkan states in the post Cold War era. It argues that the EU failed to serve a credible military actor to prevent the war, even to act an effective mediator to find feasible settlement in the region. The second contention of this study is that the EU has been effective in influencing reconstruction and state building process in the Balkan region after the war through its civilian power instruments: namely the accession carrot and economic instruments
ARIKAN, H. (2012). The European Union Policy towards the Balkan States inthe Post-Cold War Era. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 2012, 15–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/358220
References (11)
Arıkan, Harun “Good Neibourlines Conditioanlity for EU Membership: The EU’s Policy Towards The Cprus Conflict and Its Security Implications”, Ankara Universitesi, Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol.58, No.4, pp.25-47.
Arıkan Harun, Turkey and the EU: An Awkward Candidate For EU Membership?, Ashgate, 2006. Arıkan Harun, “The European Union: As a Civilian Power: Success or Faliure?, Suleyman Demirel Universitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı 25, Mayıs 2012. Batır Kerem, “War in the Balkans: Humanitarian Intervention and Beyond”, in Haluk Kabaalioglu, Muzaffer Dartan, M.Sait Akman and Cigdem Nas (editors), Fort his, see European Commission, Bosnia-Herzegovina 2011
Progress Report, SEC(2011) 1206 final, Brussels, p.6. European Commission, Commission Opinion On Serbia’s Application for Membership of the European Union, SEC(2011) 1208 final], Brussels, 2011, p. 8. Europenazation of South-Esatern Europe: Domestic Impacts of the Accession Process, Marmara University European Community Institute, 2005. Cottey Andrew, “Europe’s New Sub-regionalism”, Journal of Strategic Studies, Volume 23, No.2, 2000, pp.23-47.
Dover, Robert, “The EU and the Bosnian Civil War 1992-1995: The Capabilities- Expectations Gap at the Hearth of the EU’s Foreign Policy”, European Security, Vol.14, No.3, 2005, pp.297-318.
European Commission, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2006 Progress Report, [COM (2006) 649 final], Brussels, 2006.
European Commission, Commission Opinion on Serbia’s Application for Membership of the European Union, [SEC (2011) 1208 final], Brussels. European Council, Presidency Conclusions, Annex II Declaration on the Former Yugoslavia, The European Council at Birmingham, 16 October 1992, General Secretariat of the European Council, Brussels, 1992.
European Council, Presidency Conclusions, European Council at Corfu, 24-25 June 1994, General Secretariats of the European Council, Brussels, 1994.
European Council, Presidency Conclusions, European Council at Thessaloniki, 19-20 June 2003, General Secretariats of European Council, Brussels, 2003. Fabry Mikulus, “International Norms of Territorial Integrity and the Balkan Wars of the 1990s”,
Global Society, Vol.16, No.2, 2002, pp.145-174. Friis Lykke and Murphy Anna, “Turbo Charged Negotiations: the EU and the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe, Journal of European Public Policy”, Vol. 7, No.5, 200