SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 44

Zeugma’dan Bir Geç Roma Definesi

Hüseyin Levent KÖKER
Pages
202–207
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Mints of Antioch and Carthage to be represented with 6 coins and Constantinople, Nicomedia and Rome follow them respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The hoard was unearthed in the sector named Kaya Odası located in the south of Villa Danae at Zeugma in 23.03.2009.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It consist 424 bronze coins and coin fragments, which are dated 4th and 5th century A.D.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Mints of Antioch and Carthage to be represented with 6 coins and Constantinople, Nicomedia and Rome follow them respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The hoard was unearthed in the sector named Kaya Odası located in the south of Villa Danae at Zeugma in 23.03.2009. It consist 424 bronze coins and coin fragments, which are dated 4th and 5th century A.D. The earliest identified coin in the hoard attributed to house of Constantine and the latest one attributed Leo I. The coins bear the type of monogram that is uncertain gives the possible latest date of the hoard, around AD 490. Most of the identifiable coins can be attributed to Leo I, Theodosius II and Marcianus. It might be said that great majority of the coins probably came from the eastern mints. Mints of Antioch and Carthage to be represented with 6 coins and Constantinople, Nicomedia and Rome follow them respectively.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖKER, H. L. (2018). Zeugma’dan Bir Geç Roma Definesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 44, 202–207. https://ajindex.com/articles/358170

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. ARSLAN, M. (1987). Taburabat definesi Arcadius devri sikkeleri, Anadolu Medeniyetleri Müzesi Yıllığı, 1986, 45-50.
  2. ARSLAN, M. (1989). Taburabat definesi Roma devri sikkeleri, Anadolu Medeniyetleri Müzesi Yıllığı, 1988, 156-167. (İngilizce özet) ARSLAN, M. (1999).
  3. The Taburabat Hoard, C. S. Lightfoot (Ed.), Recent Turkish Coin Hoards and Numismatic Studies içinde (s. 43-55),
  4. Oxford. CARSON, R. A. G. (1990).
  5. Coins of the Roman Empire, London&New York. CARSON, R. A. G., HİLL P. V., KENT, J. P. C. (1989). Late Roman Bronze Coinage (LRBC II), London. KENT, J. P. C. (1981). The Roman Imperial Coinage VIII. The Family of Constantine I. A. D. 337-364 (RIC VIII), London. PEARCE, J. W. E. (1951). The Roman Imperial Coinage IX. Valentinian I – Theodosius I, (RIC IX), London. KENT, J. P. C. (1994). The Roman Imperial Coinage X. The Divided Empire and the Fall of the Western Parts AD. 394-491 (RIC X), London. SEEGER, A. (1976).
  6. A Hoard of Late Roman Bronze Coins, Coin Hoards, 2, 55-60.
  7. THOMSEN, R. (1986). The Greco-Romen Coins. A. P. Christensen, R. Thomsen, G. Ploug (Ed.), Hama: foulles et recherches 1931-1938 III. 3: The Greco-Roman objects of clay, the coins and the necropolis içinde (s. 59-69), Copenhagen.