Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2009 / Sayı: 19

The use of language in political Rhetoric:Linguistic manipulation

Pages
111–122
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

One of the conclusions that the authors have arrived at is that the linguistic manipulation can be considered as an influential instrument of political rhetoric.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The paper is devoted to exploring allusion, metonymy, and metaphor- the linguistic devices used in political rhetoric.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The theoretical framework has been designed considering the theoretical implications derived from the research of the late 20th and early 21st centuries on political discourse conducted by e.g.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:One of the conclusions that the authors have arrived at is that the linguistic manipulation can be considered as an influential instrument of political rhetoric.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The paper is devoted to exploring allusion, metonymy, and metaphor- the linguistic devices used in political rhetoric. The analysis is envisaged from the perspective of linguistic manipulation. The theoretical framework has been designed considering the theoretical implications derived from the research of the late 20th and early 21st centuries on political discourse conducted by e.g. Atkinson, M., Chilton, P.A., Fairclough, N., Naciscione, A. The methodology of this inquiry has applied general principles of qualitative research, and it has been based on the discourse analysis of the authentic source materials published in The Baltic Times (2006) and The Times (2006). In this respect, the authors of the paper have been guided by selected principles of text linguistics and text pragmatics. One of the conclusions that the authors have arrived at is that the linguistic manipulation can be considered as an influential instrument of political rhetoric.

Özet

Bu makale, siyasi retorikte kullanılan kinaye, mürsel mecaz, ve metafor gibi dilbilimsel araçların kullanımını ele almaktadır. Analizler dilbilimsel bakış açısına göre ele alınmıştır. Teoretik çatı, 20. yüzyılın sonlarında ve 21. yüzyılın başlarında Atkinson, M. Chilton, P.A Fairclough, ve Naciscione A. ‘nın ortaya koymuş oldukları siyasi söylemin theoretik etkileri ile ilgili yapmış oldukları araştırmalar üzerine inşa edilmiştir. Araştırmanın metodolojisi ‘The Baltic Times (2006)’ ve ‘The Times (2006)’ gazetelerinde yayınlanan özgün makaleler ve kaynaklara dayandırılmıştır. Bu bağlamda, çalışmanın yazarları metin dilbilim ve metin edimbilim prensiplerine bağlı kalmışlardır. Çalışmanın ortaya koymuş olduğu sonuçlardan biride dilbilim manipülasyonun siyasi söylemde etkili bir araç olarak kullanılabileceğidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ROZINA, G., KARAPETJANA, I. (2009). The use of language in political Rhetoric:Linguistic manipulation. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 19, 111–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/358111

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. ATKINSON, Max. Our Master’s Voices. The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Methuen, 1984
  2. BLACK, Max. Metaphor. In Models and Metaphors, edited by Max Black, NY: Cornell BURAJA, Polina. The Linguistic Means of Political Discourse. Unpublished master paper. Riga:University of Latvia, 2007
  3. CHILTON, Paul Anthony. Politics and Language. In Concise Encyclopaedia of Pragmatics, London:Elsevier, 1998
  4. FAIRCLOUGH, Norman. Language and Power. London: Longman, 1989
  5. HALLIDAY, Michael. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edvard Arnold, 1978
  6. HESSE, Mary. Models and Analogies in Science. London: Scheed and Ward, 1966.
  7. KITTAY, Eva. Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
  8. KRESS, Gunther. Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1989.
  9. LAKOFF, George and Johnson, Mark. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press,1980. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (2001). London: Longman LUKE, Allan. Ideology. In Concise Encyclopaedia of Pragmatics, 366-369. London: Elsevier, 1998.
  10. MEY, Jacob. Whose Language? Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1986
  11. NACISCIONE, Anita. Phraseological Units in Discourse: Towards Applied Stylistics. Riga: Latvian Academy of Culture, 2001.
  12. PECHEUX, Michel. Language. Semantics and Ideology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
  13. THERBORN, Goran. The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity Press,1980.