✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
We reviewed not onlythe methods and tools but also the role of health care professionals and patient organizations in addition to cost-effectiveness issues.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, we reviewed the atrial fibrillation screening strategies in a stepwise manner and discussed the uncertainties in the assessment ofthe need for anticoagulation in light of the recently published European Heart Rhythm Association consensus document.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, we reviewed the atrial fibrillation screening strategies in a stepwise manner and discussed the uncertainties in the assessment ofthe need for anticoagulation in light of the recently published European Heart Rhythm Association consensus document.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We reviewed not onlythe methods and tools but also the role of health care professionals and patient organizations in addition to cost-effectiveness issues.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Özet
In this paper, we reviewed the atrial fibrillation screening strategies in a stepwise manner and discussed the uncertainties in the assessment ofthe need for anticoagulation in light of the recently published European Heart Rhythm Association consensus document. We reviewed not onlythe methods and tools but also the role of health care professionals and patient organizations in addition to cost-effectiveness issues.
🔖
Cite This Article
ÖZCAN, E. E., GÖRENEK, B. (2018). Lessons from the current European Heart Rhythm Association consensus document on screening for atrial fibrillation. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 222–224. https://ajindex.com/articles/357827