Journals / Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri

Pages
111–128
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

AKAY, H. Ö., BİLGİLİ, M. Y. K. (2019). Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 111–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/357701

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. . Sandrasegaran K, Lin C, Akisik FM, Tann M. State-ofthe-art pancreatic MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010
  2. [CrossRef] [2]. Patel BN Routine MR Imaging for Pancreas. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2018
  3. . Tirkes T, Menias CO, Sandrasegaran K. MR imaging techniques for pancreas. Radiol Clin North Am 2012
  4. [CrossRef] [4]. Coppens E, Metens T, Winant C, Matos C. Pineapple juice labeled with gadolinium: a convenient oral contrast for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Eur Radiol 2005
  5. [CrossRef] [5]. Barth MM, Smith MP, Pedrosa I, Lenkinski RE, Rofsky NM. Body MR imaging at 3.0 T: understanding the opportunities and challenges. Radiographics 2007
  6. [CrossRef] [6]. Erturk SM, Alberich-Bayarri A, Herrmann KA, Marti-Bonmati L, Ros PR. Use of 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluation of the abdomen. Radiographics 2009
  7. 29(6):1547-63. [CrossRef] [7]. Merkle EM, Dale BM. Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006
  8. [CrossRef] [8]. Chang KJ, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, Bluemke DA. 3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5 T. Radiographics 2008
  9. [CrossRef] [9]. Soher BJ, Dale BM, Merkle EM. A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007
  10. [CrossRef] [10]. de Bazelaire CM, Duhamel GD, Rofsky NM, Alsop DC. MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. Radiology 2004
  11. [CrossRef] [11]. Glockner JF, Hu HH, Stanley DW, Angelos L, King K. Parallel MR imaging: a user's guide. Radiographics 2005
  12. [CrossRef] [12]. Deshmane A, Gulani V, Griswold MA, Seiberlich N. Parallel MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012
  13. [CrossRef] [13]. Elster AD. How much contrast is enough? Dependence of enhancement on field strength and MR pulse sequence. Eur Radiol 1997
  14. [CrossRef] [14]. Isoda H, Kataoka M, Maetani Y, Kido A, Umeoka S, Tamai K, et al. MRCP imaging at 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T: preliminary experience in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007
  15. [CrossRef] [15]. Kim SY, Byun JH, Lee SS, Park SH, Jang YJ, Lee MG. Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: intraindividual comparison of MR cholangiography at 3.0 and 1.5 T. Radiology 2010
  16. [CrossRef] [16]. Onishi H, Kim T, Hori M, Murakami T, Tatsumi M, Nakaya Y, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with M