Journals / Turkish Studies - Language and Literature / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Features Of The Methodology Of Choosing And The Meaning Of Meaning İn The Theory Of Systems According To Al-Jurjani İn His Book (Dalail Al-İ'jaz)

مالمح أسلوبيّة االختيار ومعنى الـمعنى في نظريّة النَّظم عند الجرجان في كتابه )دالئل اإلعجاز(

Pages
987–1003
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the selection principle (according to al-Jurjani) relies on the language, which represents a treasury of the linguistic capabilities, which enables a speaker to translate words according to the status.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research seeks to study the methodology of choice and the meaning of meaning as appeared in the theory of systems in Al-Jarjani's book (Evidence of Miracles), to clarify the great impact the theory of systems has embedded in the manner of approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Versification theory, which Abd al-Qahir alJurjani (471 AH 1078 - ) coined, is one of the theories those studies have addressed well.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the selection principle (according to al-Jurjani) relies on the language, which represents a treasury of the linguistic capabilities, which enables a speaker to translate words according to the status.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research seeks to study the methodology of choice and the meaning of meaning as appeared in the theory of systems in Al-Jarjani's book (Evidence of Miracles), to clarify the great impact the theory of systems has embedded in the manner of approach. There have been many studies in the modern era that have made the approach between studying heritage and the new critical studies of theories and approaches. Versification theory, which Abd al-Qahir alJurjani (471 AH 1078 - ) coined, is one of the theories those studies have addressed well. Since al-Jurjani has coined his theory in the fifth century, studies on this theory are in progress; however, studying versification theory in terms of the following two points (the selection and meaning of the meaning) needs further research. The research in hand comes to fill this research gag. The current research includes introduction, three chapters, and conclusion. • The first chapter: the versification and its synonyms between al-Jurjani and the modern schools. • The second chapter: the selection in terms of Dalail Al-Ijaz and how the first relates to the versification. • The third chapter: meaning of the meaning in terms of Dalail Al-Ijaz and how the first relates to the versification. • Conclusion: it shows the findings the author concluded. In conclusion, the selection principle (according to al-Jurjani) relies on the language, which represents a treasury of the linguistic capabilities, which enables a speaker to translate words according to the status. Also, meaning of the meaning (according to al- Jurjani) is the main outcome al-Jurjani concluded by his theory in versification a speaker could use in more one way (e.g. metaphor, and metonymy).

Özet

يسعى هذا البحث إلى دراسة مالمح أسلوبيّة االختيار ومعنى الـمعنى كما ظهرت في نظريّة النَّظم عند الجرجان في كتابه )دالئل اإلعجاز(، لتوضيح األثر الكبير الذي رسَّخته نظريّة النظم في منهج األسلوبيّة.وقد كثرت الدراسات في العصر الحديث التي قامت بالمقاربة بين د راسة التراث، وما قدَّمته الدراسات النقديّة الحديثة من نظريّا ٍتُّي ّي)تومناهج، كما كان لنظريّة النَّظم، التي أسسها عبد القاهر الجرجان 471ه(، نصي ٌب وافر من تلك الدراسات، فمنذ أن وضع الجرجاننظريَّته في النّظم في القرن الخ امس، إلى يومنا هذا، والقراءات تتعاقب حول هذه النظريّة. لكن قَّبقيت دراسة نظريّة النَّظم فيما يتعلِالع والمثاقفة في الموضوع، وقدِقضيَتَي )االختيار، ومعنى المعنى( بحاجة إلى مزيد من تسليط ال َّضْوء، فكان هذا البحث ثمرة االطّبتكَّون البحث من: مقِدّمة، وثالثة محاور، وخاتمة، على النَّحو اآلتي:المحور األَّول: التَّظم ومترادفاته بين الجرجاني والمحدثين.اني: االختيار في دالئل اإلعجاز وعالقته بالنَّظم. َّوالمحور الثالث: معنى المعنى في دالئل اإلعجاز وعالقته بالنَّظم. َّوالمحور الثوالخاتمة: فيها رصدٌ ألهِّم النّتائج التي تو َّصل إليها الباحث.ّ أن مبدأ االختيار عند عبد القاهر الجرجاني يعتمد ِم وتبيَّن من خالل البحث ِن المتكلّل خزينة لإلمكانات اللغويّة التي تمكّعلى اللغة التي تمثمن تصريف الكالم بح َسب المقام. كما يمث معنى المعنى عند الجرجاني الحصيلة الجوهريّة التي تو ّصل إليها من خالل نظريّته في ّلم بأكثر من وسيلة، منها: المجاز، واالستعارّالنظم، والذي يتأتّى للمتكل ة، والكناية... . كلمات مفتاحيّة: نظرية النظم، االختيار، معنى المعنى، دالئل اإلعجاز

🔖

Cite This Article

KADDUM, M. (2020). Features Of The Methodology Of Choosing And The Meaning Of Meaning İn The Theory Of Systems According To Al-Jurjani İn His Book (Dalail Al-İ'jaz). Turkish Studies - Language and Literature, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 987–1003. https://ajindex.com/articles/357394

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Kurân-ı kerîm Sa‘d, Muhammed, el-İhtiyâr fi’d-dirâsâti’l-uslûbiyyeti’l-hadîseti, http://www.alfaseeh.com/vb/showthread.php?t=24953 sitesinde geçen makale Ali, ‘İmâd Abdülbâkî Abdülbâkî, (2019), el-İhâlâtu’l-cuğrâfiyye fî dîvâni Ali el-Cârim, Nüsha Dergisi, Sayı: 49, 185-200. İsmâil, ‘İzzuddîn, (1974). el-Ususu’l-cemâliyye fi’n-nakdi’l-‘Arabiyyi, Dâru’l-fikri’l-‘Arabî. ‘Ayyâd, Mahmûd, (1981). el-Uslûbiyyetu’l-hadîse muhâveletu ta‘rîf, Mecelletu fusûl. Mahsûl, Sâmiye, (2011). Uslûbu’l-ihtiyâr fi’d-dirâsâti’l-uslûbiyyeMecelletu dirâsâtin edebiyye, Sayı: 10,126-127. ez-Zehrâ, Şevkî Ali, (1996).el-Uslûb beyne Abdilkâhir ve John Merry: Dirâse mukârene, el-Âdâb. Maslûh,Sa‘d, (1992). el-Uslûb dirâse lugaviyye ihsâiyye, Âlemu’l-kutub. Rabâbia, Musâ, (2003). el-Uslûbiyye Mefâhîmuhâ ve Tecelliyyâtuhâ, 1. Baskı., Dâru’l-Kindî li’nneşri ve’t-tevzî. Ebu’l-‘Adûs, Yusuf (2007). el-Uslûbiyyetu’n-nazariyyeti ve’t-tatbîk, Dâru’l-mesîra li’n-neşri ve’ttevzî. el-Museddî,Abdüsselâm (1977). el-Uslûbiyyetu ve’l-uslûb, 1. baskı, ed-Dâru’l-‘Arabiyyeti li’l-kitâb. Halîl, İbrâhîm (1997).el-Uslûbiyye ve nazariyyetu’n-nass, 1. baskı, el-Müessesetu’l-‘Arabiyyetu li’ddirâsâti ve’n-neşr. Ebu Zeyd, Nasr Hâmid, (1996).İşkâliyyâtu’l-kırâati ve âliyyâtu’t-te’vîl, el-Merkezu’s-sikâfiyyu el- ‘Arabiyyu, ed-Dâru’l-beyzâ. ed-Dervîş, Muhyiddîn (2001).İ‘râbu’l-kur‘âni’l-kerîmi ve beyânuhu, 8. baskı, Dâru’l-yemâme li’ttıbâati ve’n-neşri ve’t-tevzî. ez-Ziriklî, Hayruddîn (2005).el-A‘lâm, 16. baskı, Dâru’l-‘ilm li’l-melâyîn. el-Endelûsî, Ebû Hayyân (1987). el-Bahru’l-muhît, 2. baskı, Dâru’l-fikr, li’t-tıbâati ve’n-neşri ve’ttevzî, Beyrût. ‘Allâm, Abdülâti (1993). el-Belâgatu’l-‘Arabiyyetu beyne’n-nâkidîne’l-hâlidîn Abdilkâhir elCürcânî ve’bni Sinân el-Hâfâcî, Dâru’l-ceyl. Abdülmuttalib, Muhammed (1994). el-Belâga ve’l-uslûbiyye, 1. baskı, eş-Şirketu’l-Mısriyyetu’l- ‘Âlemiyye li’n-neşri Longman. el-Câhiz Ebû ‘Usmân ‘Amr ibnu’l-bahr, el-Beyân ve’t-tebyîn, 1. baskı, Thk. Abdüsselâm Hârûn, Lecnetü’t-te’lîf ve’n-neşr. ‘Abdülbedî‘, Lütfî (1970).et-Terkîbu’l-luğavîyyu li’l-edeb, 1. baskı, Mektebetu’n-nahda. ibnu’l-Cinnî, Ebu’l-Feth ‘Usmân (1952).el-Hasâis, Dâru’l-kutubi’l-Mısriyye. ‘Abbâs, İhsân (2001). Târîhu’n-nakdi’l-edebîyyi, Dâru’ş-şurûk li’n-neşri ve’t-tevzî. Dervîş, Ahmed (1998). Dirâsetü’l-uslûb beyne’l-mu‘âsırati ve’t-turâs, Dâru garîb li’n-neşri ve’ttevzî. El-Cürcânî, Abdülkâhir, (1992). Delâilu’l-i‘câz, Tahkîk ve talik: Mahmûd Muhammed Şâkir, 3. baskı, Matbaatu’l-medenî, Kâhire, Dâru’l-medenî. Dehm