Journals / Maliye Dergisi / 2021 / Sayı: 180

The Role of Selected Tax Types on Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of OECD Countries

Seçili Vergi Türlerinin Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar Üzerindeki Rolü: OECD Örneği

Pages
76–92
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to econometric findings, there is a long-term negative relationship between foreign direct investment and tax on international trade, tax on income, profits and capital gains and tariff rate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the interaction between foreign direct investment and tax on international trade, tax on income, profits and capital gains and tariff rate is based on annual data from 36 OECD countries covering the years 1995- 2019 were examined by Westerlund (2007) panel cointegration test.
📊
Key Findings & Data:What makes the study different from previous studies is that it tries to determine the effect of different tax types on foreign direct investment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to econometric findings, there is a long-term negative relationship between foreign direct investment and tax on international trade, tax on income, profits and capital gains and tariff rate.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the interaction between foreign direct investment and tax on international trade, tax on income, profits and capital gains and tariff rate is based on annual data from 36 OECD countries covering the years 1995- 2019 were examined by Westerlund (2007) panel cointegration test. What makes the study different from previous studies is that it tries to determine the effect of different tax types on foreign direct investment. According to econometric findings, there is a long-term negative relationship between foreign direct investment and tax on international trade, tax on income, profits and capital gains and tariff rate.

Özet

Bu çalışmada doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ile uluslararası ticaretvergisi, gelir kâr ve sermaye vergisi ve gümrük vergisi arasındaki etkileşim1995-2019 yıllarını kapsayan 36 OECD ülkesine ait yıllık veriler ileWesterlund (2007) panel eşbütünleşme testi kullanılarak incelenmiştir.Çalışmayı daha önce yapılan çalışmalardan farklı kılan husus farklı vergitürlerinin doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar üzerindeki etkisinin belirlenmeyeçalışılmasıdır. Ekonometrik bulgulara göre doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ileuluslararası ticaret vergisi, gelir kâr ve sermaye vergisi ve gümrük vergisiarasında uzun dönemli negatif yönlü bir ilişkinin olduğu görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIMÇAKAR, İ., GÖRÜR, Ç., KANBEROĞLU, Z. (2021). The Role of Selected Tax Types on Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of OECD Countries. Maliye Dergisi, Sayı: 180, 76–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/357364

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Agodo, O. (1978), “The Determinants of US Private Manufacturing Investments in Africa”, Journal of International Business Studies, 9(Winter), 95-107.
  2. Altun, Y. ve İşleyen, Ş. (2019). Türkiye’de İktisadi Büyüme ile Sanayi Sektöründe İstihdam Arasındaki İlişkinin ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı ile Ekonometrik Analizi: 199-2017, Iğd Üniv Sos Bil Der / Igd Univ Jour Soc Sci 17, 657-676.
  3. Anichebe, A.S. (2019), "Impact of Tax Revenue on Foreign Direct Investment in Nigeria", IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 21 (7),.50-56.
  4. Arikan, Z. ve İnnecı̇, A. (2016). Vergilendirilebilir Gelir ve Gelir Vergisinde Üniter Yapıyı Bozan Uygulamalar, Sosyoekonomi, 24(30), 11-28.
  5. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. ve Mestre, R. (1998), “Error-correction Mechanism Tests for Cointegration in a Single-equation Framework”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267-283.
  6. Barlow, E.R. ve Wender, I.T. (1955), “Foreign Investment and Taxation, Englewood Cliffs”, NJ:Prentice-Hall. Bellak, C., Leibrecht, M. ve Ro¨ misch, R. (2007), “On the Appropriate Measure of Tax Burden on Foreign Direct İnvestment to the CEEs”, Applied Economic Letters, 14, 603-606.
  7. Bellak, C., Leibrecht, M. ve Stehrer, R. (2009), “The Role of Public Policy in Closing Foreign Directinvestment Gaps: An Empirical Analysis”, Empirica, 37, 19-46.
  8. Billington, N. (1999), “The Location of Foreign Direct İnvestment: An Empirical Analysis”, Applied Economics, 31, 65-76.
  9. Broekman, P. ve Van Vliet, P. (2000), “De Gevoeligheid van FDI Voor de Effective Tax Rate, Erasmus Advies Project”, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Cassou, S.P. (1997), The Link between Tax Rate Sand Foreign Direct Investment, Applied Economics, 29(10), 1295-1301.
  10. Das, P. (2019),
  11. Econometrics in Theory and Practive, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. Gateway East. de Mooij, R.A. ve Ederveen, S. (2008), “Corporate Tax Elasticities A Reader’s Guide to Empirical Findings”, Working Papers, N1 0822, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation. Demir, Y. ve Görür, Ç. (2020), “OECD Ülkelerine Ait Çeşitli Enerji Tüketimleri ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkinin Panel Eşbütünleşme Analizi ile İncelenmesi”, EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 32, 15-33. https://doi.org/10.26650/ekoist.2020.32.0005
  12. Devereux, M.P. (2006), “The Impact of Taxation on the Location of Capital, Firms and Profit: Asurvey of Empirical Evidence”, Working Papers, N1 0702, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation. Devereux, M.P. ve Griffith, R. (1999), “The Taxati