SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

SOVEREIGN-BANK NEXUS OF TURKEY: AN ANALYSIS OF SOVEREIGN RISK AND BANKING INDUSTRY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS BASED ON CAMELS RATING SYSTEM

TÜRKIYE’NİN ÜLKE RİSKİ VE BANKACILIK BAĞLANTISI: ÜLKE RİSKİ VE BANKACILIK SEKTÖR PERFORMANS İNDİKATÖRLERİNİN CAMELS DERECELENDİRME SİSTEMİNE GÖRE ANALİZİ

Osman ALTAY
Pages
217–235
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that there are significant causal relations between sovereign risk and several banking industry indicators of CAMELS rating groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine the relationship between sovereign risk and financial performance of the Turkish banking industry in order to identify the interaction channels between these two.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, financial data relating to the Turkish banking industry were analyzed based on the CAMELS rating system and were compared with Turkey’s Credit Default Swap rates using the most appropriate causality analysis tools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that there are significant causal relations between sovereign risk and several banking industry indicators of CAMELS rating groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Finans · Bankacılık · Risk

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between sovereign risk and financial performance of the Turkish banking industry in order to identify the interaction channels between these two. To this end, financial data relating to the Turkish banking industry were analyzed based on the CAMELS rating system and were compared with Turkey’s Credit Default Swap rates using the most appropriate causality analysis tools. The results showed that there are significant causal relations between sovereign risk and several banking industry indicators of CAMELS rating groups. Significant results were obtained especially as to the causalities between sovereign risk and CAMELS components, which are Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Liquidity, and Sensitivity. Empirical study indicates that 13 variables out 26 variables have causal relationship with credit default swap rates according to Toda and Yamamoto Granger non-causality test results. Although the directions of causality vary among these variables, those results, which indicate influence of credit default swap rates on banking performance indicators, are remarkable.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye'nin ülke riski ile bankacılık sektörünün finansal performansı arasındaki karşılıklı ilişkiyi aralarındaki etkileşim kanallarını ortaya koyacak şekilde analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Türkiye'deki bankacılık sektörünün finansal verileri CAMELS derecelendirme sistemine göre analiz edildi ve en uygun nedensellik araçları kullanılarak Türkiye'nin Kredi Temerrüt Swap oranları ile karşılaştırıldı. Sonuçlar, ülke riski ile CAMELS gruplamasında yer alan çeşitli bankacılık sektörü göstergeleri arasında anlamlı nedensellik ilişkisi olduğunu gösterdi. Özellikle ülke riski ile bankaların sermaye yeterliliği, mali yapıları, likidite verileri ve piyasa risklerine duyarlılıkları arasında nedensellik ilişkisi olduğuna dair anlamlı sonuçlara ulaşıldı. Ampirik çalışma, Toda ve Yamamoto Granger nedensellik testi sonuçlarına göre 26 değişkenden 13'ünün kredi temerrüt takas oranları ile nedensellik ilişkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu değişkenler arasında nedensellik yönleri farklılık gösterse de kredi temerrüt takas oranlarının bankacılık performans göstergeleri üzerindeki etkisini gösteren sonuçlar dikkat çekicidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTAY, O. (2021). SOVEREIGN-BANK NEXUS OF TURKEY: AN ANALYSIS OF SOVEREIGN RISK AND BANKING INDUSTRY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS BASED ON CAMELS RATING SYSTEM. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 217–235. https://ajindex.com/articles/357281

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Acharya, V. V. & Schnabl, P. (2010). Do global banks spread global imbalances? Asset-backed commercial paper during the financial crisis of 2007-09. IMF Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2010.4
  2. Aldunate, F. (2019). Deposit insurance, bank risk-taking, and failures: Evidence from early twentieth-century state deposit insurance systems. Review of Corporate Finance Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfz001
  3. Andreeva, D. C. & Vlassopoulos, T. (2019). Home bias in bank sovereign bond purchases and the bank-sovereign nexus. International Journal of Central Banking. Angeloni, C. & Wolff, G. B. (2012). Are banks affected by their holdings of government debt? Bruegel Working Paper. Annual Economic Report 2020. (2020). Bank of International Settlement. Retrieved May 29, 2021, from https://www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2020e.htm
  4. Ashcraft, A. B. (2008). Does the market discipline banks? New evidence from regulatory capital mix. Journal of Financial Intermediation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2007.05.003
  5. Avery, R. B., Belton, T. M. & Goldberg, M. A. (1988). Market discipline in regulating bank risk: New evidence from the capital markets. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. https://doi.org/10.2307/1992286
  6. BIS. (2011). The impact of sovereign credit risk on bank funding conditions. In Committee on the Global Financial System Papers No. 43. BIS. (2013). Basel Committee on banking supervision: Core principles for effective banking supervision. In Bank for International Settlements. Boitan, I. A. & Marchewka-Bartkowiak, K. (2021). The sovereign-bank nexus in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak—Evidence from EU member states. Risks, 9(5), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9050098
  7. Bolton, P. & Jeanne, O. (2011). Sovereign default risk and bank fragility in financially integrated economies. IMF Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2011.5
  8. Bordo, M. D., Meissner, C. M. & Stuckler, D. (2010). Foreign currency debt, financial crises and economic growth: A long-run view. Journal of International Money and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.01.002
  9. Boyd, J. H. & De Nicoló, G. (2005). The theory of bank risk taking and competition revisited. Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00763.x
  10. Brunnermeier, M. K., Garicano, L., Lane, P. R., Pagano, M., Reis, R., Santos, T., Thesmar, D., Van Nieuwerburgh, S. & Vayanos, D. (2016). The sovereign-bank diabolic loop and esbies. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer