Journals / Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2010 / Sayı: 8

Max Weber’s Bureaucratic Organisation theory and its application In schools in North Cyprus

Max Weber’in Bürokratik Örgüt anlayısının Kuzey Kıbrıs’taki okullardaki uygulanısı

Pages
151–178
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the participants in SL have moulded some of Weber’s theory, hence the rules of the Ministry of Education and Culture, according to their own context, are aware of the way the administrators use their authority and its types, and use this awareness very effectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims at analysing in detail one of the classic management theories, Max Weber’s Bureaucratic Organisation, highlighting his theoretical ideology and the reasons behind the criticisms of the approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It will be followed by an evaluation of a school, which is both a secondary and high school (SL) in the Nicosia district of North Cyprus, in terms of Weber’s theory in an attempt to highlight how much of it is being applied in schools in TRNC.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the participants in SL have moulded some of Weber’s theory, hence the rules of the Ministry of Education and Culture, according to their own context, are aware of the way the administrators use their authority and its types, and use this awareness very effectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper aims at analysing in detail one of the classic management theories, Max Weber’s Bureaucratic Organisation, highlighting his theoretical ideology and the reasons behind the criticisms of the approach. It will be followed by an evaluation of a school, which is both a secondary and high school (SL) in the Nicosia district of North Cyprus, in terms of Weber’s theory in an attempt to highlight how much of it is being applied in schools in TRNC. The results showed that the participants in SL have moulded some of Weber’s theory, hence the rules of the Ministry of Education and Culture, according to their own context, are aware of the way the administrators use their authority and its types, and use this awareness very effectively.

Özet

Bu çalısma klasik yönetim teorilerinden biri olan Max Weber’in Bürokratik Örgüt anlayısını detaylı bir sekilde analiz ederek, onun teorik ideolojilerini anlamak ve yaklasımına yönelik elestirilerin nedenlerini ortaya çıkarmak amacıyla yapılmıstır. Bu analizin ardından, Kuzey Kıbrıs’ın Lefkosa bölgesine bağlı ortaokul ve lise bölümü olan bir okul (SL), Weber’in teorileri açısından incelenmis, bu teorilerin ne kadarının halen KKTC’deki okullarda kullanıldığı değerlendirilmistir. Sonuçlar, SL’deki katılımcıların,Weber’in bazı teorilerini ve dolayısıyla Milli Eğitim ve Kültür Bakanlığı’nın kurallarını, içinde bulundukları durumlara göre kendi içlerinde sekillendirdiklerini, okul yöneticilerinin kullandıkları yetki ve yetki çesitlerinin farkında olduklarını ve bu farkındalığı etkili bir sekilde kullandıklarını ortaya çıkarmıstır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZMATYATLI, İ. (2010). Max Weber’s Bureaucratic Organisation theory and its application In schools in North Cyprus. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 8, 151–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/356695

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Aydın, M. (1994). Eğitim Yönetimi: Kavramlar, Kuramlar, Süreçler, Đliskiler. Ankara:
  2. Hatiboğlu Yayınları.
  3. Axline, W.A. (1994). The Political economy of regional cooperation: Comparative case studies. Pinter publishers: London. Basaran, İ. E. (1984). Eğitime Giris. Ankara:
  4. Sevinç Matbaa Blau, P. M. and Scott, W.R (1962). Formal Organisations. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company. Boyd, W.L, Plank, D.N and Sykes, G. (2000). ‘Teacher Unions in hard times’ in Tom Loveless ed., Conflicting Missions? Teachers Unions and Educational Reform. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  5. Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1974). Okul Yönetiminde Yeni Yapı ve Davranıs. Ankara:
  6. AÜEF. Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1985). Eğitim yönetiminde teori ve uygulama. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları.
  7. Bürokrasi and Max Weber (2009). http://tebesirtozu.blogcu.com/burokrasi-ve-maxweber_ 3516815.html Eren, E. (2003). Yönetim ve Organizasyon: Çağdas ve Küresel Yaklasımlar. Kırklareli: Beta Basım. Fuller, H.L, Mitchell, G.A and Hartmann, M.E (2000). ‘Collective Bargaining in Milwaukee Public Schools’ in Tom Loveless ed., Conflicting Missions? Teachers Unions and Educational Reform. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  8. Gouldner, A.W. (1964). Patterns of Industrial Bureucracy. New York: Free Press.
  9. Hess, F.M and Leal, D.L (2003). Technocracies, bureaucracies, or responsive polities? Urban school systems and the politics of school violence prevention. Social Science Quarterly. Vol. 84, Issue 3, p. 526-542.
  10. Hicks, H. and Gullett, R. (1975). Organisations: Theory and Behaviour. London: MacGraw Hill, Kogakusha Ltd. Hoy, W. and Miskel, C. (1978). Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice. New York: Random House. Merton, R. K. (1956). Social Theory and Social Structure. New Yok: Free Press.
  11. Smith, K.B and Meier, K.J (1994). ‘Politics, Bureaucrats, and Schools’, Public Administration Review. Vol. 54, Issue 6, p.551-559.
  12. Stone, J.A (2000). ‘Collective Bargaining in Public Schools’ in Tom Loveless ed., Conflicting Missions? Teachers Unions and Educational Reform. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  13. Toch, T.(1996). ‘Why teachers don’t teach’ US News and World Report. Vol.120, Issue 8, p.62-71
  14. Weber, M. (1905) The Protestant Ethic and "The Spirit of Capitalism". (Penguin Books, 2002) translated by Peter Baehr and Gordon C. Wells, pp.9-12
  15. Yıldırım, A. ve Simsek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arastırma Yöntemleri. Ankara:
  16. Seçkin Yayınları.
  17. Yin, R.K. (2003).