SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

From the transcendent sovereignty of mono theos to immanent sovereignty of the politician

Tek Tanrı'nın aşkın egemenliğinden siyasinin içkin egemenliğine

Saime TUĞRUL
Pages
153–175
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The fiction of “The King’s two bodies”, the dispositions of representation of the invisibility of the sovereign and the articulation mechanisms of authority and power in the West European Monarchies are discussed as the secular readings of monotheism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article begins with the thesis that secular political sovereignty establishes its legitimacy and creates related dispositions on the political theological model of monotheist domination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We discuss the monotheist and particularly Christian concept of sovereignty through the theologico-politics and economic paradigm of Schmitt and Agamben.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The fiction of “The King’s two bodies”, the dispositions of representation of the invisibility of the sovereign and the articulation mechanisms of authority and power in the West European Monarchies are discussed as the secular readings of monotheism.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article begins with the thesis that secular political sovereignty establishes its legitimacy and creates related dispositions on the political theological model of monotheist domination. We discuss the monotheist and particularly Christian concept of sovereignty through the theologico-politics and economic paradigm of Schmitt and Agamben. The major theories of sovereignty (Machiavelli, Bodin, Hobbes, Rousseau, Montesquieu) are shortly mentioned in this context. The fiction of “The King’s two bodies”, the dispositions of representation of the invisibility of the sovereign and the articulation mechanisms of authority and power in the West European Monarchies are discussed as the secular readings of monotheism.

Özet

Bu makale, siyasi egemenliğin meşruiyetini, özellikle Tek Tanrısal bir teoloji politik model üzerine kurduğu ve bunun tertibatlarının teolojik kavramlardan kaynaklandığı tezini savunmaktadır. Bu tez çerçevesinde, Monoteizmin ve özellikle Hıristiyanlığın oluşturduğu egemenlik kavramı, Schmitt ve Agambenin geliştirdikleri, teoloji-politik ve ekonomi paradigmaları içinde açıklanıyor. Tek Tanrının dünya üzerinde kurduğu hâkimiyet modeli 153.sayfa nden esinlenen devlet ve egemenlik teorilerinin başlıcalarına da (Machiavelli, Bodin, Hobbes, Rousseau, Montesquieu) bu bağlamda kısaca değiniliyor. Batı Avrupa Monarşilerinde, “Kralın iki bedeni”, görünmezliğin temsiliyet tertibatları ve erk ile otorite eklemlenmesi kurguları, monoteizmin seküler siyasi okumaları olarak sunuluyor.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUĞRUL, S. (2013). From the transcendent sovereignty of mono theos to immanent sovereignty of the politician. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 153–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/356581

References (18)

  1. Agamben, Giorgio (2008a), Signatura Rerum Sur la Méthode, Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, Paris. (2008), Le Règne et la Gloire, Seuil, Paris. (2003), L’État d’Exception, Seuil, Paris (1997),
  2. Homo Sacer, Seuil, Paris. Arendt, Hannah (2008), Du Mensonge à la Violence, Calmann-Lévy, Paris. (1994), Condition de L’homme Moderne, Calmann-Lévy, Paris. (1968),
  3. Between Past and Future, Viking, New York. Balibar, Etienne (2000), “ Prolégomènes à la souveraineté: la Frontière, l’Etat, le Peuple”, Les Temps Modernes, n 610, septembre - octobre - novembre. Benjamin, Walter (2000), “Critique de la violence”, Oeuvres I, Folio-Gallimard, Paris, s. 210-243.
  4. Berger, Peter L. (1990), The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion, Anchor Press,
  5. New York. Bloch, Marc (1983),
  6. Les Rois thaumaturges, Gallimard, Paris. Bodin, Jean (1999), Les six livres de la République, Ed. Confluences, Paris. D’Entrèves, Alexandre Passerin (1967), La Notion de l’Etat, Sirey, Paris. Gauchet, Marcel (1985), Le désenchantement du monde, Folio-Gallimard, Paris. Habermas, Jürgen (2010), L’espace Public, Payot, Paris. Hobbes, Thomas (2000), Léviathan, Gallimard-folio essais, Paris. (1982), Le Citoyen ou les Fondemants de la Politique, Flammarion, Paris. Kantorowicz, Ernst H (1997), The King’s two bodies, A study in mediaeval political theology, Princeton University Press,
  7. Princeton. Lacan, Jacques (2005),
  8. Le Triomphe de la Religion, Seuil, Paris. Locke, John (1977), Le Deuxième Traité du Gouvernement Civil, Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, Paris. Machiavelli (1979),
  9. The Prince, Penguin Books, Middlesex, England. Montesquieu (1979), De l’Esprit des lois I, II, GF, Flammarion, Paris. Peterson, Erik (2007), Le monothéisme: un probleme politique et autres traités, Bayard, Paris. Proudhon (1929), Les confessions d’un révolutionnaire, Riviere, Paris. Rawls John (1987), Théorie de la Justice, Seuil, Paris. Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1973),
  10. Du Contrat Social, Union Générale d’Edition,
  11. Paris. (1988), Théologie Politique, Gallimard, Paris. Schmitt, Carl (2005),
  12. Poitical Theology, University of Chicago Press,
  13. Chicago. Saint Augustin (1993), La Crétion du Monde et le Temps, Folio-Gallimard, Paris. Scholem, Gershom G (2003),
  14. La Kabbale et Sa Symbolique, Ed. Payot & Rivages, Paris. Tuğrul, Saime (2010),
  15. Ebedi Kutsal Ezeli Kurban, Çok Tanrılıktan Tek Tanrılığa Kutsal ve Kurbanlık Mekanizmaları, İletişim Yayınları,
  16. İstanbul.
  17. Winter, Jean-Pierre (2011),
  18. Dieu, L’amour et la Psychanalyse, Bayard, Paris.