Journals / Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

The relationship of peer bullying with familial expressed emotion and psychopathology

Akran zorbalığı ile aile duygu dışa vurumu ve psikopatoloji arasındaki ilişki

Pages
77–86
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings showed the importance of family climate in peer bullying. (Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2020; 21(1):77-86)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of peer bullying among the adolescents, deter- mine the risk factors of PB and determine the relationship between peer bullying and psychiatric symptoms and expressed emotion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The sample of the study consisted of 5 th , 6 th , 7 th , and 8 th grade students, and the students who were selected with simple random sampling method were divided into four groups as the victim, bully, bully/victim and no peer bullying.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings showed the importance of family climate in peer bullying. (Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2020; 21(1):77-86)
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of peer bullying among the adolescents, deter- mine the risk factors of PB and determine the relationship between peer bullying and psychiatric symptoms and expressed emotion. Methods: The sample of the study consisted of 5 th , 6 th , 7 th , and 8 th grade students, and the students who were selected with simple random sampling method were divided into four groups as the victim, bully, bully/victim and no peer bullying. In the study, a Personal Information Form, Olweus Bullying Questionnaire, Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire and Shortened Expressed Emotion Scale were used as data collection tools. Results: Prevalence of peer bullying of secondary school was found to be %47 (31.4% victim, 4.6% bully, 11% bully/victim). When the study groups were compared in terms of subscales, behavioral problems and emotional problems were significantly higher in both the bully and the victim groups, while prosocial behaviors were found to be significantly less in these two groups. However, teenagers, who were a victim or a bully, were found to perceive their families significantly less emotionally supportive and intrusive compared to their peers who were not a victim or a bully. The perception of the family as intrusive increased the chances of being a victim by 1.04 times and a victim/bully by 1.08 times. The lack of emotional support increased the chances of being a bully/victim by 1.03 times. Conclusion: Our study reveals that there is a relationship between emotional-behavioural problems and peer bullying. It has been found that being part of bully, victim or both forms of peer bullying is significantly related to psychopathology. The findings showed the importance of family climate in peer bullying. (Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2020; 21(1):77-86)

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmadaki amaç erişkin kimliğinin şekilleneceği ergenlik döneminde akran zorbalığı yaygınlığını, eşlikeden risk etkenlerini ve akran zorbalığı ile duygu dışavurumu arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır. Yöntem: Bursa iliilköğretim 5. 6. 7. ve 8. sınıfta okuyan ve basit rastgele örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilmiş öğrencilere Kişisel BilgiFormu, Olweus Öğrenciler için Akran Zorbalığı Anketi, Güçler ve Güçlükler Anketi ve Kısaltılmış Duygu DışavurumÖlçeği uygulanmıştır. Örneklem akran zorbalığına uğramayan/uygulamayan, kurban, zorba ve zorba/kurban olarakdört gruba ayrılarak incelenmşitir. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda ilköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencileri arasında zorbalıkdavranışının yaygınlığı %47 (kurban %31.4, zorba %4.6, zorba/kurban %11) olarak bulunmuştur. Çalışma gruplarıölçek alt boyutları açısından karşılaştırıldığında davranış sorunları ve duygusal sorunlar hem zorba, hem de kurbanolan grupta anlamlı olarak yüksekken, olumlu kişiler arası ilişkiler olarak adlandırılan prososyal davranışlar iki gruptada anlamlı olarak düşük saptanmıştır. Bununla birlikte, kurban veya zorba olan ergenlerin olmayan akranlarına göreailelerini istatistiksel yönden anlamlı düzeyde duygusal olarak daha az destekleyici ve müdahaleci algıladıklarıbulunmuştur. Gruplar arasında dikkat eksikliği, akran problemleri ve ailenin sinirli algılanması açısından fark saptan-mamıştır. Aile ikliminin müdahaleci olarak algılanması kurban olmayı 1.04 kat, zorba/kurban olmayı 1.08 kat artır-maktadır. Bununla birlikte duygusal destek yokluğu 1.03 kat zorba/kurban olmayı artırmaktadır. Tartışma: Çalışma-mızda algılanan aile ikliminin ve duygusal-davranışsal sorunların akran zorbalığı üzerine etkisi incelenmiştir. Akranzorbalığına zorba, kurban veya her iki şekilde dahil olmanın duygusal-davranışsal sorunlarla belirgin olarak ilişkiliolduğu ve akran zorbalığında aile ikliminin önemli olduğu görülmüştür. (Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2020; 21(1):77-86)

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜR, N., ERAY, Ş., MAKİNECİOĞLU, İ., SIĞIRLI, D., VURAL, A. P. (2020). The relationship of peer bullying with familial expressed emotion and psychopathology. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 77–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/356125

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Olweus D. Bullying at Schools: What We Know and What We can do? Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1993, p.19. Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A, Currie D, Looze M, Roberts C, et al. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behavi-our in School-aged Children (HBSC) Study: Inter-national Report from the 2009/2010 Survey. Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, 2012. Güvenir T. Okulda Akran İstismarı. İkinci baskı, Ankara: Kök Yayıncılık, 2010. Olweus D. Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Oxford, England: Hemisphere Press, 1978.
  2. Kim YS, Leventhal B. Suicide and bullying. A re-view. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2008; 20:133-154.
  3. Austin S, Joseph S. Assessment of bully/victim problems in 8 to 11 year-olds. Br J Educ Psychol 1996; 66:447-456.
  4. Heikkila HK, Vaananen J, Helminen M, Frojd S, Marttunen M, Kaltiala-Heino R. Involvement in bullying and suicidal ideation in middle adoles-cence: a 2-year follow-up study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2013; 22:95-102.
  5. Kaltiala-Heino R, Rimpela M, Marttunen M, Rimpela A, Rantanen P. Bullying, depression and suicidal ideation in Finnish adolescents: school survey. BMJ 1999; 319:348-351.
  6. Örengül AC, Sabuncuoğlu OT. Dikkat eksikliği hiperaktivite bozukluğu olan çocuklarda akran örselemesi/zorbalık. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2018; 19:405-410.
  7. Tural Hesapçıoğlu S, Yeşilova Meraler H, Ercan F. Bullying in schools and its relation with depressive symptoms, self-esteem, and suicidal ideation in adolescents. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2018; 19:210-216. Arseneault L. Annual Research Review: The persistent and pervasive impact of being bullied in childhood and adolescence: implications for policy and practice. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2018; 59(4):405-421.
  8. Perren S, Hornung R.Bullying and delinquency in adolescence: Victims and perpetrators; family and peer relations. Swiss Journal of Psychology/ Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie 2005; 64:51-64.
  9. Curtner-Smith M, Culp A, Culp R, Scheib C, Owen K, Tilley A, et al. Mothers’ parenting and young economically disadvantaged children’s relational and overt bullying. J Child Fam Stud 2006; 15:177-189.
  10. Bowers L, Maughan B, Caspi A, Moffit T, Arse-neault L. Families promote emotional and be-havioral resilience to bullying: Evidence of an environment effect. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2010; 51:809-817.
  11. Stevens V, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Van Oost P. Relationship of The family environment to chil-dren’s involvemen