SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2

Kant’s Critique of the Faculty of Medicine

Kant’ın Tıp Fakültesi Eleştirisi

Özkan AGTAŞ
Pages
45–74
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, the main contours of Kant’s views on medicine and his criticism of the faculty of medicine will be discussed with reference to the Enlightenment’s close in-volvement with medicine, the tensions that divide German medicine within itself, the status of the relations between the government’s public health policies and the medical discipline, and finally, the complex relations between philosophy and medicine.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Kant’s writings on the conflict between the higher faculties (theology, law, and medicine) whose teachings are compatible with the goals of the government itself and the lower faculty (philosophy) which is subject only to laws given by reason in the Prussian university system have always attracted strong academic interest.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, it is also clear that Kant’s critique of the faculty of medicine has been neglected compared to ohers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, the main contours of Kant’s views on medicine and his criticism of the faculty of medicine will be discussed with reference to the Enlightenment’s close in-volvement with medicine, the tensions that divide German medicine within itself, the status of the relations between the government’s public health policies and the medical discipline, and finally, the complex relations between philosophy and medicine.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Kant’s writings on the conflict between the higher faculties (theology, law, and medicine) whose teachings are compatible with the goals of the government itself and the lower faculty (philosophy) which is subject only to laws given by reason in the Prussian university system have always attracted strong academic interest. However, it is also clear that Kant’s critique of the faculty of medicine has been neglected compared to ohers. In this article, the main contours of Kant’s views on medicine and his criticism of the faculty of medicine will be discussed with reference to the Enlightenment’s close in-volvement with medicine, the tensions that divide German medicine within itself, the status of the relations between the government’s public health policies and the medical discipline, and finally, the complex relations between philosophy and medicine.

Özet

Kant’ın Prusya üniversite sisteminde yönetimin amaçlarıyla uyumlu üst fakülteler (ilahiyat, hukuk ve tıp) ile yalnızca aklın yasalarına tabi olan alt fakülte (felsefe) arasın-daki çatışmaya dair yazdıkları, her zaman güçlü bir akademik ilginin konusu olmuştur. Fakat Kant’ın tıp fakültesi eleştirisinin diğerlerine kıyasla ihmal edilmiş olduğu da açık-tır. Bu makalede, Kant’ın tıbba dair görüşleri ve tıp fakültesine yönelik eleştirisinin temel hatları Aydınlanmanın tıpla olan yakın ilgisi, Alman tıbbını kendi içerisinde bölen geri-limler, yönetimin kamu sağlığı politikaları ile tıp disiplini arasındaki ilişkilerin statüsü ve nihayet felsefe ile tıp arasındaki karmaşık ilişkiler üzerinden gösterilmeye çalışılacak-tır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AGTAŞ, Ö. (2021). Kant’s Critique of the Faculty of Medicine. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2, 45–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/355603

References (19)

  1. Arendt, H. (2019). Kant’ın Siyaset Felsefesi Üzerine Dersler. (Çev. D. Sezer ve İ. Ilgar). İstanbul:
  2. İletişim Yayınları.
  3. Borges, M. (2016). “High Doses of Hellebore”. Kant’s Shorter Writings: Critical Paths Outside the Critiques. (Ed. R.V.O. Jiménez et al). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 180-188.
  4. Broman, T. H. (1989). “University Reform in Medical Thought at the End of the Eighteenth Century”. Osiris, 5, 36-53.
  5. Broman, T. H. (1996). The Transformation of German Academic Medicine: 1750-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Cassier, E. (2017). Kant’ın Yaşamı ve Öğretisi. (Çev. D. Özlem). İstanbul:
  7. Notos Kitap. Clarke, M. (1997). “Kant’s Rhetoric of Enlightenment”. The Review of Politics, 59(1), 53-73.
  8. Critchley, S. (2014). Ölü Filozoflar Kitabı. (Çev. T. Kabadayı). Ankara:
  9. BilgeSu Yayınları.
  10. Çörekçioğlu, H. (2003). “Eleştirel Üniversite: Kant ve Fakülteler Çatışması”. Toplum ve Bilim, 97, 217-233. David-Ménard, M. (2000). “Kant’s ‘An Essay on the Maladies of the Mind’ and Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime”. Hypatia, 15(4), 82-98.
  11. De Ceglia, F. P. (2007). “Hoffmann and Stahl. Documents and Reflections on the Dispute”. History of Universities, Vol. XXII (1). (Ed. M. Feingold). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 98-140.
  12. De Quincey, T. (2011). Immanuel Kant’ın Son Günleri. (Çev. T. Ayteş). İstanbul:
  13. Monokl Yayınları.
  14. Derrida, J. (2004). “Mochlos, or The Conflict of the Faculties”. Eyes of the University. (Tr. R. Rand and A. Wygant). Stanford: Stanford University Press, 83-112.
  15. Evans, D. (2008). “The Conflict of the Faculties and the Knowledge Industry: Kant’s Diagnosis, in His Time and Ours”. Philosophy, 83(4), 483-495.
  16. Foucault, M. (2008). Introduction to Kant’s Anthropology. (Tr. R. Nigro and K. Briggs). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e). French, R. (1990). “Sickness and the Soul: Stahl, Hoffmann and Sauvages on Pathology”. The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century. (Ed. A. Cunninngham and R. French). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 88-110.
  17. Frierson, P. (2009a). “Kant on Mental Disorder. Part 1: An Overview”. History of Psychiatry, 20(3), 267-289.
  18. Frierson, P. (2009b). “Kant on Mental Disorder. Part 2: Philosophical Implications of Kant’s Account”. History of Psychiatry, 20(3), 290-310.
  19. Gay, P. (1977). The Enlightenment: An Interpretation. Volume II: The Science of Freedom. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company. Geier, M. (2018). Kant’ın Dünyası. (Çev. E. Özbek). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Gilgen,