Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

Comparing total intravenous anesthesia and spinal anesthesia in Lumbar spinal surgery

Lomber omurga cerrahisinde spinal anestezi ve total intravenöz anestezinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
186–190
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia has advantages over TIVA with respect to reduced amount of blood loss, reduced total stay in the operation room and better postoperative analgesia for lumbar disk surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We compared, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and spinal anesthesia in lumbar disk surgery, with respect to surgical times, blood loss, hemodynamic effects and postoperative pain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In Group S (n=30), spinal anesthesia was performed with 15 mg bupivacaine.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia has advantages over TIVA with respect to reduced amount of blood loss, reduced total stay in the operation room and better postoperative analgesia for lumbar disk surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We compared, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and spinal anesthesia in lumbar disk surgery, with respect to surgical times, blood loss, hemodynamic effects and postoperative pain. Methods: Sixty ASA I-II patients, planned for lumbar disk surgery, were allocated into two groups. In Group S (n=30), spinal anesthesia was performed with 15 mg bupivacaine. When the T6-10 sensory level was achieved, the patient was turned to the prone position. In Group T (n=30), propofol and remifentanil infusions were administered. Anesthesia and surgical times, blood loss, perioperative mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and postoperative pain scores were recorded. Results: Surgical onset and surgical time were similar (p>0.05). Blood loss and duration in the operating room (94.1±20.8 vs. 108.0±23.2 min) was less in Group S (p<0.05). MAP at 3rd min of anesthesia and HR at the 30, 40 and 50 min of surgery was less in Group T (p<0.002). Postoperative pain scores were higher in Group T (p<0.004). Patient and surgeon satisfaction scores were comparable (p>0.05). Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia has advantages over TIVA with respect to reduced amount of blood loss, reduced total stay in the operation room and better postoperative analgesia for lumbar disk surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Lomber omurga cerrahisinde spinal anestezi ve total intravenöz anestezi (TIVA) tekniklerinin operasyon süresi, kanama miktarı, hemodinamik özellikler, postoperatif ağrıya etkilerini değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: Lomber diskektomi ve/veya laminektomi operasyonu planlanan, ASA I-II risk grubu 60 hasta iki gruba ayrıldı. Grup S’de (n=30), 15 mg bupivakain ile spinal anestezi uygulamasından sonra duyu bloğu T6-10 seviyesine ulaşınca, yüzüstü pozisyon verildi. Grup T’de (n=30), propofol ve remifentanil ile TIVA gerçekleştirildi. Anestezi, operasyon süreleri, kanama miktarı, perioperatif ortalama kan basıncı (OKB), kalp hızı (KAH), postoperatif ağrı düzeyleri kaydedildi. Bulgular: Operasyona başlama ve operasyon süreleri gruplarda benzerdi (p>0,05). Grup S’de operasyon anında kanama miktarı, operasyon odasında kalış süresi (94,1±20,8 dk vs 108,0±23,2 dk) daha az izlendi (p 0.05). Sonuç: Operasyon anında kanama ve operasyon odasında kalış süresini azaltması; daha etkili postoperatif analjezi sağlaması nedeni ile spinal anestezi TIVA’ya alternatif olarak uygulanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRKOL, S. Ö., ÖZLÜ, O., ÜTEBEY, G., ER, U. (2009). Comparing total intravenous anesthesia and spinal anesthesia in Lumbar spinal surgery. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 186–190. https://ajindex.com/articles/355225

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Tetzlaff JE, Dilger JA, Kodsy M, Al-Bataineh J, Yoon HJ, Bell GR. Spinal anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery. J Clin Anesth 1998; 10: 666-9
  2. Jellish WS, Thalji Z, Stevenson K, Shea J. A prospective randomized study comparing short- and intermediate-term perioperative outcome variables after spinal or general anesthesia for lumbar disk and laminectomy surgery. Anesth Analg 1996;83.559-64
  3. Smrcka M, Baudysova O, Juran V, Vidlak M, Gal R, Smrcka V. Lumbar disc surgery in regional anaesthesia- 40 years of experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001; 143: 377-81
  4. McLain RF, Kalfas I, Bell GR, Tetzlaff JE, Yoon HJ, Rana M. Comparison of spinal and general anesthesia in lumbar laminectomy surgery: a case controlled analysis of 400 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 2: 17-22
  5. Demirel CB, Kalaycı M, Ozkocak I, Altunkaya H, Ozer Y, Acıkgoz B. A prospective randomized study comparing perioperative outcome variables after epidural or general anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2003; 15: 185-92
  6. Papadopoulos EC, Girardi FP, Sama A, Pappou IP, Urban MK, Cammisa FP. Lumbar microdiscectomy under epidural anesthesia: a comparison study. The Spine J 2006; 6:.561-4
  7. Matheson D. Epidural anaesthesia for lumbar laminectomy and spinal fusion. Can Anaes Soc J 1960; 7: 149-57
  8. Tetzlaff JE, O’Hara JF, Yoon HJ, Schubert A. Heart rate variability and the prone position under general versus spinal anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 1998; 10: 656-9
  9. Scott NB, Kehlet H. Regional anaesthesia and surgical morbidity. Br J Surg 1988;75:299-304
  10. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. Br Med J 2000; 321: 1493-7
  11. Ozkose Z, Ercan B, Unal Y, Yardım S, Kaymaz M, Dogulu F, Pasaoglu A. Inhalation versus total intravenous anesthesia for lumbar disc herniation: comparison of hemodynamic effects, recovery characteristics and cost. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2001; 13: 296-302
  12. Gözdemir M, Sert H, Yılmaz N, Kanbak O, Usta B, Demircioğlu RI. Remifentanil-propofol in vertebral disc operations: hemodynamics and recovery versus desşurane- N2O inhalation anesthesia. Adv Ther 2007; 24: 622-31
  13. Pendeville PE, Kabongo F, Veyckemans F. Use of remifentanil in combination with desşurane or propofol for ambulatory oral surgery. Acta Anaesth Belg 2001; 52: 181-6
  14. Kayhan Z. Klinik Anestezi. Genişletilmiş 3. baskı. İstanbul: Lo