Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

IS SINGLE INJECTION ULTRASOUND-GUIDED INFRACLAVICULAR BLOCK SUFFICIENT FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN IN HUMERUS FRACTURE SURGERY?

ULTRASON EŞLİĞİNDE TEK ENJEKSİYON İNFRAKLAVİKULAR BLOK HUMERUS KIRIĞI CERRAHİSİNDE YETERLİ POSTOPERATİF ANALJEZİ SAĞLAYABİLİR Mİ?

Pages
212–216
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

But, there was no significant difference in complications between both groups (p<0.05).Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block could be a positive option for both sufficient of postoperative analgesiacompared with GA in patients with humerus fracture undergoing upper extremity surgery

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the sufficiency of postoperative pain effects of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block and generalanesthesia in patients with humerus fracture undergoing upper extremity surgery.Method: The study was planned as a retrospective study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Forty two patients who underwent humerus fracture surgery betweenJuly 2016 and July 2017, with either general anesthesia (GA, n=19) or ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block (ICB, n=23) wereincluded in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:But, there was no significant difference in complications between both groups (p<0.05).Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block could be a positive option for both sufficient of postoperative analgesiacompared with GA in patients with humerus fracture undergoing upper extremity surgery
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare the sufficiency of postoperative pain effects of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block and generalanesthesia in patients with humerus fracture undergoing upper extremity surgery.Method: The study was planned as a retrospective study. Forty two patients who underwent humerus fracture surgery betweenJuly 2016 and July 2017, with either general anesthesia (GA, n=19) or ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block (ICB, n=23) wereincluded in the study. Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and during activity at 30thmin, 2, 6, 12 and24thhours, the total amount of morphine consumed, the first analgesia requirement time were evaluated by postoperative patientcontrolled analgesia (PCA) devices.Results: The demographic characteristics of the patients were similar (p>0.05). The VAS scores at rest and during activityand total amount of consumed morphine were lower in the ICB group in the first 12 hours than in the GA group (p<0.001). Totalamount of consumed morphine were lower, and the first analgesia requirement time was much more in the ICB group than in theGA group (p<0.001). But, there was no significant difference in complications between both groups (p<0.05).Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block could be a positive option for both sufficient of postoperative analgesiacompared with GA in patients with humerus fracture undergoing upper extremity surgery

Özet

Amaç: Humerus kırığı nedeni ile üst ekstremite cerrahisi geçiren hastalarda, ultrason kılavuzluğunda tek enjeksiyon infraklavikülerbloğu ile genel anestezinin postoperatif ağrı değerlerini karşılaştırmak.Yöntem: Çalışma retrospektif olarak planlandı. Temmuz 2016 ile Temmuz 2017 tarihleri arasında humerus kırığı operasyonuyapılan, genel anestezi (Grup GA, n = 19) veya ultrason kılavuzluğunda infraklaviküler blok (Grup IKB, n = 23) uygulanan hastalarçalışmaya dahil edildi. Postoperatif 30 dk, 2., 6., 12. ve 24. saatlerde dinlenme ve aktivite sırasındaki görsel analog skalası (VAS)ile ağrı skorları, tüketilen toplam morfin miktarı ve ilk analjezi gereksinimi zamanı hasta kontrollü analjezi cihazı ile değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Hastaların demografik özellikleri benzerdi (p>0.05). Postoperatif ilk 12 saat dinlenme ve aktivite sırasında VASskorları ve toplam tüketilen morfin miktarı IKB grubunda GA grubuna göre daha düşüktü (p 0.05).Sonuç: Ultrason kılavuzluğunda infraklaviküler blok, humerus kırığı cerrahisi geçiren hastalarda genel anestezi ile karşılaştırıldığındayeterli postoperatif analjezi için olumlu bir seçenek olabilir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİÇEKCİ, F., YILDIRIM, A., ÖNAL, İ. Ö., ACAR, M. A., ÇELİK, J. B., KARA, İ. (2017). IS SINGLE INJECTION ULTRASOUND-GUIDED INFRACLAVICULAR BLOCK SUFFICIENT FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN IN HUMERUS FRACTURE SURGERY?. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 212–216. https://ajindex.com/articles/355169

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Shah S, Mehta K, Patel K, Patel K. Comparison of infraclavicular brachial plexus block with supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper limb surgeries. NHL J Med Sci 2013; 2: 43-45
  2. Yang CW, Kwon HU, Cho CK et al. Comparison of infraclavicular and supraclavicular approaches to the brachial plexusus in neurostimulation. Korean J Anesthesiol 2010; 58: 260-266
  3. Nadeau MJ, Le´vesque M, Nicolas Dion N. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia for upper limb surgery. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 304-320
  4. Sivrikaya Z, Turan G, Cetiner R et al. Comparison of RIVA and infraclavicular block in fore arm and hand surgery. North Clin Istanb 2017; 4: 131-140
  5. Tran DQH, Russo G, Munoz L, Zaouter C, Finlayson RJ. A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided supraclavicular, infraclavicular and axillary brachial plexus blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 34: 366-371
  6. Gurkan Y, Acar S, Solak M, Toker K. Comparison of nevre stimulation vs. ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal infraclavicular block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52: 851-855
  7. Sauter AR, Dodgson MS, Stubhaug A, Halstensen AM, Klaastad Øivind. Electrical nevre stimulation or ultrasound guidance for lateral sagittal infraclavicular blocks: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded comparative study. Anesth Analg 2008;106: 1910-1915
  8. Klaastad Ø, Smith HJ, Smedby O et al. A novel infraclavicular brachial plexus block: the lateral and sagittal technique, developed by magnetic resonance imaging studies. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 252-256
  9. Imperato J, Sanchez LD. Pulmonary emergencies in the elderly. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2006; 24: 317-338
  10. Schulz-Stubner S. Brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia. Der Anaesthesist 2003; 52: 643-56
  11. Hadzic A, Arliss J, Kerimo¤lu B. A comparison of infraclavicular nevre block versus general anesthesia for hand and wrist day case surgeries. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 127-132
  12. Liisanantti O, Luukkonen J, Rosenberg PH. High dose bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and in axillary brachial plexus block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 601-606
  13. Franco CD, Vieira ZE. 1001 subclavian perivascular brachial plexus blocks: success with a nevre stimulator. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 41-46
  14. Ootaki C, Hayashi H, Amano M. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: an alternative technique to anatomical landmark-guided approaches. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25: 600-604
  15. Sandhu NS, Manne JS, Medabalmi PK, Capan LM. Sonographically gu