Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2002 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4

Intramedullary nailing of adult femoral fractures

Erişkin femur cisim kırıklarının intramedüller çivilerle tedavisi

Pages
316–321
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing should be the primary indication for stable and unstable femoral fractures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: We evaluated the results of treatment of adult femoral fractures treated by intramedullary nails.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Sixty-two patients (15 females, 48 males; mean age 29 years; range 16 to 62 years) with 64 femoral fractures were treated by intramedullary nailing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing should be the primary indication for stable and unstable femoral fractures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kemik çivileri · Erişkin · Femur kırıkları

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the results of treatment of adult femoral fractures treated by intramedullary nails. Methods: Sixty-two patients (15 females, 48 males; mean age 29 years; range 16 to 62 years) with 64 femoral fractures were treated by intramedullary nailing. Eighty-three percent of the fractures was closed and 17% was open. According to the Winquist (W) classification, there were 16 (25%) W0, 22 (34%) W1, nine (14%) W2, nine (14%) W3, and eight (13%) W4 fractures. The mean duration between trauma and surgery was 18 days (range 4 to 130 days), and the mean hospital stay was 25 days (range 11 to 142 days). Open and closed techniques were employed in 62 (97%) and two (3%) fractures, respectively. Nine fractures were unlocked; dynamic and static locking were performed in 39 and 16 fractures, respectively. In the open technique, secondary procedures involved grafting in 14 cases, cerclage in eight cases, grafting and cerclage in 10 cases, and grafting and screw fixation in one case. The results were assessed according to the criteria by Thoresen et al. The mean follow-up was 28 months (range 7 to 62 months). Results: Fifty-one patients (80%) had satisfactory, 13 patients (20%) had poor outcome. All proximal locking screws (n=20) were successfully inserted, whereas 23 (24%) of 95 distal screws missed the nail holes. Complications included superficial infection (n=3), osteomyelitis (n=4), trochanteric bursitis (n=1), irritation of the skin by the distal screws (n=4), heterotopic ossification (n=6), shortening more than 1 cm (n=8), rotational malalignment greater than 10$\circ$ (n=2), migration of the nail through the knee joint (n=2), drill breakage while preparing the distal holes (n=2), knee range of motion below 100$\circ$ (n=6), and delayed union (n=2). Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing should be the primary indication for stable and unstable femoral fractures.

Özet

Amaç: Erişkin femur cisim kırıklarının intramedüller çivilerle tedavi sonuçları değerlendirildi. Çalışma planı: Kilitli intramedüller çivi ile osteosentez uygulanan 64 femur cisim kırığı (63 hasta; 15 kadın, 48 erkek; ort. yaş 29; dağılım 16-62) çalışmaya alındı. Kırıkların %83'ü kapalı, %17'si açık kırık idi. Winquist sınıflandırmasına göre, 16 olguda (%25) W0, 22 olguda (%34) W1, dokuz olguda (%14) W2, dokuz olguda (%14) W3, sekiz olguda (%13) W4 kırık vardı. Travma ile ameliyat arasında geçen süre ortalama 18 gün (dağılım 4-130 gün); hastanede kalış süresi ortalama 25 gün (dağılım 11-142 gün) idi. İntramedüller çivilerin ikisi kapalı (%3), 62'si açık (%97) yöntemle uygulandı; çivilemelerin dokuzu kilitsiz, 39'u dinamik, 16'sı statik idi. Açık teknikle ameliyat edilen hastaların 14'üne intramedüller çivileme sonrası grefonaj, sekizine serklaj, 10'una grefonaj ve serklaj, birine grefonaj ve vida ile tespit uygulandı. Sonuçlar Thoresen ve ark.nın ölçütlerine göre değerlendirildi. Hastalar ortalama 28 ay (dağılım 7-62 ay) süreyle izlendi. Sonuçlar: Hastaların %80'inde iyi, %20'sinde kötü sonuç alındı, Gönderilen 20 proksimal kilitleme vidasının tamamı çivi deliklerinden geçerken, distale gönderilen 95 vidanın 23'ü (%24) delikleri tutmadı. Komplikasyonların dağılımı yüzeysel enfeksiyon (3 hasta), osteomiyelit (4 hasta), trokanterik bursit (1 hasta), distal vida irritasyonu (4 hasta), heterotopik ossifikasyon (6 hasta), 1 cm'den fazla kısalık (8 hasta), 10 dereceden fazla rotasyon kusuru (2 hasta), çivi distalinin diz eklemine girmesi (2 hasta), distal vida deliklerinin açılması sırasında dril kırılması (2 hasta), diz hareket açıklığının 100 derecenin altında olması (6 hasta), kaynama gecikmesi (2 hasta) şeklindeydi. Çıkarımlar: İntramedüller çivileme stabil ve instabil bütün femur cisim kırıklarında öncelikle tercih edilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURAKBAŞA, O., HAKLAR, U., TUYGUN, H., TÜRKMEN, M. (2002). Intramedullary nailing of adult femoral fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4, 316–321. https://ajindex.com/articles/354726

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Beaty JH, Austin SM, Warner WC, Canale ST, Nichols L. Interlocking intramedullary nailing of femoral-shaft fractures in adolescents: preliminary results and complications. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:178-83. 2. Thoresen BO, Alho A, Ekeland A, Stromsoe K, Folleras G, Haukebo A. Interlocking intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures. A report of forty-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1985;67:1313-20. 3. Charles MC, Bruce DB. Locked nailing of femoral fractures. In: Bruce DB, editor. The science and practice of intramedullary nailing. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1996. p: 161-82. 4. Wiss DA, Fleming CH, Matta JM, Clark D. Comminuted and rotationally unstable fractures of the femur treated with an interlocking nail. Clin Orthop 1986;(212):35-47. 5. Winquist RA, Hansen ST. Segmental fractures of the femur treated by closed intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1978;60:934-9. 6. Hansen ST. Internal fixation of children's fractures of the lower extremity. Orthop Clin North Am 1990;21:353-63. 7. Sojbjerg JO, Eiskjaer S, Moller-Larsen F. Locked nailing of comminuted and unstable fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg[Br] 1990;72:23-5. 8.Chapman MW. The role of intramedullary fixation in open fractures. Clin Orthop 1986;(212):26-34. 9. Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM. Femoral shaft fractures. Skeletal Trauma 1992;2;1525-641. 10. Lhowe DW, Hansen ST. Immediate nailing of open fractures of the femoral shaft. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988;70:812-20. 11.Williams MM, Askins V, Hinkes EW, Zych GA. Primary reamed intramedullary nailing of open femoral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop 1995;(318):182-90. 12. Johnson KD, Tencer AF, Blumenthal S, August A, Johnston DW. Biomechanical performance of locked intramedullary nail systems in comminuted femoral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop 1986;(206):151-61. 13. Carlson DW, Rodman GH Jr, Kaehr D, Hage J, Misinski M. Femur fractures in chest-injured patients: is reaming contraindicated? J Orthop Trauma 1998;12:164-8. 14. Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Riemer BL, Brumback RJ, McCarthy ML, Burgess AR, et al. Adult respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, and mortality following thoracic injury and a femoral fracture treated either with intramedullary nailing with reaming or with a plate. A comparative study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79:799-809. 15. Taylor JC. Fractures of lower extremity. In: Crenshaw AH, editor. CampbellÕs operative orthopaedics. Vol. 2, 8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1992. p. 785-893. 1