Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2012 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Glove perforation time and frequency in total hip arthroplasty procedures

Pages
57–60
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Surgical gloves should be changed when they are excessively contaminated with surgical fluids and the surgeon and first assistant should also change their outer gloves at an average of every 90 minutes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate glove perforation rate and time and evaluate the factors affecting glove perforation in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Nine hundred seventy-nine gloves used in 57 THA procedures were assessed according to the perforation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Surgical gloves should be changed when they are excessively contaminated with surgical fluids and the surgeon and first assistant should also change their outer gloves at an average of every 90 minutes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate glove perforation rate and time and evaluate the factors affecting glove perforation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: Nine hundred seventy-nine gloves used in 57 THA procedures were assessed according to the perforation. Forty-four (77.2%) procedures were primary THA and 13 (22.8%) were revision THA. Gloves were changed when perforated, become dirty with blood or blood products, and before bone cementing. All gloves were filled with water at the end of the operation and controlled for perforation. Two hundred and one surgical gloves used during scrubbing and removed after draping the patient were examined as the control group. The location (which finger), number and time of the perforation, surgery type and duration, and distribution of the perforation location according to the surgical team were assessed. Results: Patients’ mean age was 62.9±14.6 (range: 33 to 97) years and the mean surgery duration was 162.9±32.0 minutes. Thirty-two glove perforations were noted in 19 of the operations. Of these perforations, 28 belonged to the surgeons and first assistants. There was no significant difference between the dominant or non-dominant hand according to the location of perforations. Perforations in the first and second fingers of the gloves accounted for 81.3% of all perforations. There was no significant difference in terms of number of gloves used, perforation numbers and operation duration between the primary and revision THA procedures. Two perforated gloves (0.99%) were found in the control group and the difference between the number of perforations in the control and study groups was significant (p=0.048). Conclusion: We recommend the use of two pairs of gloves to avoid the risk of contamination and protect the surgical team from infectious disease in major surgeries like THA. Surgical gloves should be changed when they are excessively contaminated with surgical fluids and the surgeon and first assistant should also change their outer gloves at an average of every 90 minutes.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, İ., UĞRAŞ, A. A., SUNGUR, İ., YILMAZ, M., KORKMAZ, M., ÇETİNUS, E. (2012). Glove perforation time and frequency in total hip arthroplasty procedures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 57–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/354697

References (15)

  1. Dodds RD, Guy PJ, Peacock AM, Duffy SR, Barker SG, Thomas MH. Surgical glove perforation. Br J Surg 1988;75: 966-8
  2. McLeod GG. Needlestick injuries at operations for trauma. Are surgical gloves an effective barrier? J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989;71:489-91
  3. Sebold EJ, Jordan LR. Intraoperative glove perforation. A comparative analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;(297):242- 4
  4. Wong PS. Surgical glove perforation during cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:188
  5. Yinusa W, Li YH, Chow W, Ho WY, Leong JC. Glove punctures in orthopaedic surgery. Int Orthop 2004;28:36-9. Epub 2003 Oct 8
  6. Palmer JD, Rickett JW. The mechanism and risks of surgical glove perforation. J Hosp Infect 1992;22:279-86
  7. Tanner J. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection. J Perioper Pract 2006;16:571
  8. Demirçay E, Unay K, Bilgili MG, Alataca G. Glove perforation in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2010;15:790- 4
  9. Maffulli N, Capasso G, Testa V. Glove perforation in elective orthopedic surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 1989;60:565-6
  10. Eckersley JR, Williamson DM. Glove punctures in an orthopaedic trauma unit. Injury 1990;21:177-8
  11. Laine T, Aarnio P. Glove perforation in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. A comparison between single, double indicator gloving and double gloving with two regular gloves. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:898-900
  12. Çetinus E, Hüner H, Cever İ, Ekerbiçer H. Ortopedik cerrahide önemli bir sorun: eldiven delinmeleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi T›p Fakültesi Dergisi 2001;26:96-102
  13. Al-Maiyah M, Bajwa A, Mackenney P, Port A, Gregg PJ, Hill D, et al. Glove perforation and contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:556-9
  14. Misteli H, Weber WP, Reck S, Rosenthal R, Zwahlen M, Fueglistaler P, et al. Surgical glove perforation and the risk of surgical site infection. Arch Surg 2009;144:553-8
  15. Hübner NO, Goerdt AM, Stanislawski N, Assadian O, Heidecke CD, Kramer A, et al. Bacterial migration through punctured surgical gloves under real surgical conditions. BMC Infect Dis 2010;10:192.