Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2006 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3

Psychological evaluation of patients with benign musculoskeletal system tumors

Benign kas-iskelet sistemi tümörü olan hastalarda psikolojik durum değerlendirmesi

Pages
199–201
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Lack of correlation between sociodemographic characteristics and the psychological status suggests that informing the patients with special attention to their physical and psychological integrity may contribute positively to the patients’ psychiatric status.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study was designed to determine to what extent psychological status was affected by sociodemographic characteristics and by being informed about the diagnosis in patients with benign musculoskeletal tumors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 112 male patients (mean age 23.8 years; range 20 to 35 years) who were hospitalized for benign tumors of the musculoskeletal system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Lack of correlation between sociodemographic characteristics and the psychological status suggests that informing the patients with special attention to their physical and psychological integrity may contribute positively to the patients’ psychiatric status.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kemik neoplazmları · Hastaneye yatırma · Psikiyatrik durum derecelendirme ölçekleri

Abstract

Objectives: This study was designed to determine to what extent psychological status was affected by sociodemographic characteristics and by being informed about the diagnosis in patients with benign musculoskeletal tumors. Methods: The study included 112 male patients (mean age 23.8 years; range 20 to 35 years) who were hospitalized for benign tumors of the musculoskeletal system. A questionnaire was administered to all the patients concerning their sociodemographic characteristics and the status of their knowledge about the diagnosis. Psychological status was assessed by the Hamilton Depression Evaluation Scale. Results: The depression level was not correlated with the localization (upper or lower extremity) of the musculoskeletal system tumor, the marital status of the patient, and the presence or absence of knowledge of the patient about the diagnosis (p>0.05). Educational status was the only factor that was found to be in correlation with the depression level (p<0.05). Conclusion: Lack of correlation between sociodemographic characteristics and the psychological status suggests that informing the patients with special attention to their physical and psychological integrity may contribute positively to the patients&#8217; psychiatric status.

Özet

Amaç: Kas ve iskelet sistemini tutan benign tümöral kitlesi olan hastaların, sosyodemografik özelliklerin ve tanı hakkında bilgi sahibi olup olmamanın psikolojik durumlarını ne yönde etkilediği araştırıldı. Çalışma planı: Kas ve iskelet sistemini tutan benign tümöral kitle nedeniyle yatırılan 112 erkek hasta (ort. yaş 23.8; dağılım 20-35) çalışmaya alındı. Hastaların hepsine sosyodemografik özelliklerini, tanıyı bilip bilmediklerini sorgulayan bilgi formu doldurtuldu ve psikolojik durumları Hamilton Depresyon Değerlendirme Ölçeği ile değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Benign tümöral kitlenin alt ekstremite ya da üst ekstremitede olmasının depresyon düzeyini anlamlı etkilemediği görüldü (p>0.05). Hastanın evli ya da bekâr olması ya da hastalığı hakkında bilgi sahibi olup olmaması ile depresyon düzeyi arasında anlamlı ilişki bulunmadı (p>0.05). Eğitim düzeyiyle depresyon düzeyi arasında anlamlı ilişki saptandı.

🔖

Cite This Article

SİNİCİ, E. P., TUNAY, S., KILIÇ, E., ERLER, K., ALTINMAKAS, M. (2006). Psychological evaluation of patients with benign musculoskeletal system tumors. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3, 199–201. https://ajindex.com/articles/354654

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Özkan S. Liyezon Psikiyatrisi Sempozyumu (I-II). In: Genel tıpta psikiyatrik morbidite; 23-24 Ekim 1990; İstanbul, Türkiye. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Basımevi Film Merkezi; 1993. s. 81-132
  2. Özkan MB. Psikoonkoloji. In: IV. Ulusal Konsültasyon Liyezon Psikiyatri Kongresi 1996-97; 30 Ekim-1 Kasım 1996; İstanbul, Türkiye. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Basımevi Film Merkezi; s. 21-9
  3. Lederberg MS, Holland JH. Psycho-oncology. In: Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ, editors. Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry. 6th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. p. 1570-92
  4. Breitbart W. Identifying patients at risk for, and treatment of major psychiatric complications of cancer. Support Care Cancer 1995;3:45-60
  5. Craig TJ, Abeloff MD. Psychiatric symptomatology among hospitalized cancer patients. Am J Psychiatry 1974;131:1323-7
  6. Öner N. Türkiye’de kullanılan psikolojik testler. 3. baskı. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları; 1997
  7. Özmen V. Liyezon modeli içerisinde kanser hastalarına bütüncül yaklaşım. In: III. Ulusal Konsültasyon-Liyezon Psikiyatrisi Kongresi ve Mezuniyet Sonrası Eğitim Kursu; 2-5 Kasım 1995; İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Film Merkezi; 1994. s. 58-66.