Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2012 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

Peritendinöz yapışıklıkların önlenmesinde perikondrium otogreftinin kullanımı: Tavşanlarda deneysel çalışma

Use of a perichondrial autograft on the peritendinous adhesion: an experimental study in rabbits

Pages
208–214
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Perichondrium graft may isolate the repaired tendon and may reduce scar formation and adhesions during the healing period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the use of a clinically available perichondrium graft as an adjunct to surgical tendon repair.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Eight male New Zealand white rabbits of similar height and weight were used in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Perichondrium graft may isolate the repaired tendon and may reduce scar formation and adhesions during the healing period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the use of a clinically available perichondrium graft as an adjunct to surgical tendon repair. Methods: Eight male New Zealand white rabbits of similar height and weight were used in this study. The left and right Achilles tendons were used as the experimental and control group, respectively. Perichondrium grafts were harvested from the right ears of the rabbits. Both Achilles tendons were clearly cut and repaired. After the repair, the perichondrium graft was wrapped around the tendon repair sites of the left Achilles tendons. Rabbits were sacrificed after six weeks and the tendons were examined macroscopically and histopathologically. Results: Macroscopically and histopathologically, less adhesion occurred when the perichondrium graft was wrapped around the tendon repair site compared to the control group. Conclusion: Perichondrium graft may isolate the repaired tendon and may reduce scar formation and adhesions during the healing period.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda, perikondrium greftinin tendon onarımı sonrası yapışıklıkları önlemedeki etkinliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Çalışma planı: Bu çalışmada 8 erkek, beyaz Yeni Zelanda tavşanı kullanıldı. Her bir tavşanın sol Aşil tendonu deney grubunu, sağ Aşil tendonu ise kontrol grubunu oluşturdu. Deney grubunda kullanılan perikondrium greftleri ise tavşanların sağ kulaklarından elde edildi. Tavşanların her iki Aşil tendonları kesilip onarıldı. Onarım sonrası, sol Aşil tendonu onarım sahası perikondrium grefti ile sarıldı. Altıncı haftanın sonunda hayvanlar sakrifiye edilerek tendonlar makroskopik ve histopatolojik olarak incelendi. Bulgular: Perikondrium grefti sarılan tendon onarımı sahasında makroskopik ve histopatolojik olarak kontrol grubu ile karşılaştırıldığında daha az yapışıklık gözlendi. Çıkarımlar: Perikondrium grefti onarılan tendonu izole ederek iyileşme sürecinde nedbe oluşumunu ve olası yapışıklıkları azaltabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İRKÖREN, S., DEMİRDÖVER, C., AKAD, B. Z., AYTUĞ, Z., YILMAZ, E., ÖZTAN, Y. (2012). Peritendinöz yapışıklıkların önlenmesinde perikondrium otogreftinin kullanımı: Tavşanlarda deneysel çalışma. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 208–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/354599

References (15)

  1. James R, Kesturu G, Balian G, Chhabra AB. Tendon: biology, biomechanics, repair, growth factors, and evolving treatment options. J Hand Surg Am 2008;33:102-12
  2. Potenza AD. Tendon healing within the flexor digital sheath in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962;44-A:49-64
  3. Gelberman RH, Manske PR, Akeson WH, Woo SL, Lundborg G, Amiel D. Flexor tendon repair. J Orthop Res 1986;4:119-28
  4. Ingraham JM, Hauck RM, Ehrlich HP. Is the tendon embryogenesis process resurrected during tendon healing? Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:844-54
  5. Khanna A, Friel M, Gougoulias N, Longo UG, Maffulli N. Prevention of adhesions in surgery of the flexor tendons of the hand: what is the evidence? Br Med Bull 2009;90:85-109
  6. Stark HH, Boyes JH, Johnson L, Ashworth CR. The use of paratenon, polyethylene film, or silastic sheeting to prevent restricting adhesions to tendons in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:908-13
  7. Wheeldon T. The use of cellophane as a permanent tendon sheath. J Bone Joint Surg 1939;21:393-6
  8. Potenza AD. Critical evaluation of flexor-tendon healing and adhesion formation within artificial digital sheaths. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963;45:1217-33
  9. Hunter JM, Salisbury RE. Flexor-tendon reconstruction in severely damaged hands. A two-stage procedure using a silicone- dacron reinforced gliding prosthesis prior to tendon grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1971;53:829-58
  10. Peterson WW, Manske PR, Dunlap J, Horwitz DS, Kahn B. Effect of various methods of restoring flexor sheath integrity on the formation of adhesions after tendon injury. J Hand Surg Am 1990;15:48-56
  11. Kobayashi M, Toguchida J, Oka M. Development of polyvinyl alcohol-hydrogel (PVA-H) shields with a high water content for tendon injury repair. J Hand Surg Br 2001;26:436-40
  12. Hanff G, Hagberg L. Prevention of restrictive adhesions with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene diffusible membrane following flexor tendon repair: an experimental study in rabbits. J Hand Surg Am 1998;23:658-64
  13. Iflik S, Oztürk S, Gürses S, Yetmez M, Güler MM, Selmanpako¤lu N, et al. Prevention of restrictive adhesions in primary tendon repair by HA-membrane: experimental research in chickens. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:373-9
  14. Demirkan F, Colakoglu N, Herek O, Erkula G. The use of amniotic membrane in flexor tendon repair: an experimental model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002;122:396-9
  15. Ferguson RE, Rinker B. The use of a hydrogel sealant on flexor tendon repairs to prevent adhesion formation. Ann Pl