Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2012 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

Spastik serebral palsili çocuklarda spastisiteyi değerlendirmede modifiye Ashworth ve Tardieu skalalarının gözlemci içi güvenirliği

The outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed and rehabilitated knees versus healthy knees: a functional comparison

Pages
186–195
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Significant differences were found in the activity level of the reconstruction group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the functional performance and muscle strength of cases of ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft followed by rehabilitation with those of healthy subjects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study included fifteen patients (range: 20 to 35 years) who underwent ACL reconstruction 18 to 24 months previously and a control group of 15 healthy volunteers with similar characteristics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Significant differences were found in the activity level of the reconstruction group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the functional performance and muscle strength of cases of ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft followed by rehabilitation with those of healthy subjects. Methods: This study included fifteen patients (range: 20 to 35 years) who underwent ACL reconstruction 18 to 24 months previously and a control group of 15 healthy volunteers with similar characteristics. Cases were evaluated with physical examinations, functional tests, subjective scales (Lysholm, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSSS), and Tegner activity scale) and isokinetic test. Differences between the reconstruction group and control group were analyzed. Results: Significant differences were found in the activity level of the reconstruction group (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı spastik serebral palsili (SP) çocuklarda spastisiteyi değerlendirmede kullanılan Modifiye Ashworth Skalası (MAS) ve Modifiye Tardieu Skalası (MTS) yöntemlerinin gözlemci içi güvenirliğini incelemekti. Çalışma planı: Spastik SP’li 37 olgunun dirsek fleksörleri, el bileği fleksörleri, kalça addüktörleri, hamstringler, gastroknemius ve soleus kasları spastisitenin şiddeti açısından MAS ve MTS ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışmanın sonucunda MAS’ın gözlemci içi güvenirliğinin tüm ölçümler için anlamlı olup (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BALTACI, G., YILMAZ, G., ATAY, A. Ö. (2012). Spastik serebral palsili çocuklarda spastisiteyi değerlendirmede modifiye Ashworth ve Tardieu skalalarının gözlemci içi güvenirliği. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 186–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/354597

References (16)

  1. Scherzer AL. History, definition and classification of cerebral palsy. In: Scherzer AL, editor. Early diagnosis and interventional therapy in cerebral palsy. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2001. p. 1-26
  2. Koman LA, Smith BP, Shilt JS. Cerebral palsy. Lancet 2004; 363:1619-31
  3. Levitt S. Treatment of cerebral palsy and motor delay. 4th ed. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Publishing; 2004
  4. Priori A, Cogiamanian F, Mrakic-Sposta S. Pathophysiology of spasticity. Neurol Sci 2006;27:S307–9
  5. Peacock WJ. The pathophysiology of spasticity. In: Gage JR, editor. the treatment of gait problems in cerebral palsy. London: Mac Keith Pres; 2004. p. 32-41
  6. Tunç B, Ömerci AR, Yorganc›gil H. Cerebral palsy (Infantile cerebral palsy). [Article in Turkish] SDÜ T›p Fakültesi Dergisi 1994;1:37-42
  7. Livanelio¤lu A, Kerem Günel M. Physiotherapy in cerebral palsy. [Text in Turkish] Ankara: Yeni Özbek Matbaas›; 2009
  8. Alhusaini AA, Dean CM, Crosbie J, Shepherd RB, Lewis J. Evaluation of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy using Ashworth and Tardieu Scales compared with laboratory measures. J Child Neurol 2010;25:1242-7
  9. Alibiglou L, Rymer WZ, Harvey RL, Mirbagheri MM. The relation between Ashworth Scores and neuromechanical measurements of spasticity following stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2008;5:18
  10. Pandyan AD, Price CI, Barnes MP, Johnson GR. A biomechanical investigation into the validity of the modified Ashworth Scale as a measure of elbow spasticity. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:290-3
  11. Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Moammeri H, Jalaie S. Ashworth Scales are unreliable for the assessment of muscle spasticity. Physiother Theory Pract 2006;22:119-25
  12. Craven BC, Morris AR. Modified Ashworth scale reliability for measurement of lower extremity spasticity among patients with SCI. Spinal Cord 2010;48:207-13
  13. Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Meissner D, Grundmann K, Zange C, Koch R, et al. Reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: a comparison study. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:751-9
  14. Yam WK, Leung MS. Interrater reliability of Modified Ashworth Scale and Modified Tardieu Scale in children with spastic cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol 2006;21:1031-5
  15. Fosang AL, Galea MP, McCoy AT, Reddihough DS, Story I. measures of muscle and joint performance in the lower limb of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45:664-70
  16. Patrick E, Ada L. The Tardieu Scale differentiates contracture from spasti