Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

Practice of tourniquet use in Turkey: a pilot study

Pages
162–170
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, protocols should be developed for acceptable standards of tourniquet use

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate patterns in the current practice of tourniquet use in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participating staff consisted of 3 groups: Group 1: orthopedic surgeons; Group 2: orthopedic residents; and Group 3: orthopedic academic staff.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, protocols should be developed for acceptable standards of tourniquet use
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate patterns in the current practice of tourniquet use in Turkey. The results of this study can provide detailed information regarding tourniquet use and evaluate the need for guidelines on tourniquet use in Turkey.Methods: The questionnaire was sent to orthopedic residents and surgeons by either giving printed questionnaires directly or by establishing preliminary communication with surgeons and then sending questionnaires by e-mail. Participating staff consisted of 3 groups: Group 1: orthopedic surgeons; Group 2: orthopedic residents; and Group 3: orthopedic academic staff. Statistical differences in tourniquet use were analyzed among the groups.Results: Use of mechanical tourniquet was significantly higher in Group 1. Plain cuffs were used in orthopedic surgical practice more frequently. Assistant and orthopedic theatre personnel were commonly reported by participants as the tourniquet applicant. Periodic educational practice was not routine. The number of reported complications was higher in Group 3. Cuff padding was generally routine practice. Scientifically valid optionsat lowest inflation pressure were not observed among the results at the expected rates.Conclusion: The results of this pilot study indicate that there is wide variation in some aspects of tourniquet practice in Turkey. The differences are not acceptable because of the potential for significant complications with some practices. There is a need to provide and ensure adequate education to provide the best patient care. Furthermore, protocols should be developed for acceptable standards of tourniquet use

🔖

Cite This Article

BOYA, H., TUNCALI, B., ÖZCAN, Ö., ARAÇ, Ş., TUNCAY, İ. C. (2016). Practice of tourniquet use in Turkey: a pilot study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 162–170. https://ajindex.com/articles/354589

References (13)

  1. Noordin S, McEwen JA, Kragh JF Jr, Eisen A, Masri BA. Surgical tourniquets in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:2958-67. Aziz ES. Tourniquet use in orthopaedic anesthesia. Cur- rent Anaesthesia & Critical Care 2009;20:55-9.
  2. Sadri A, Braithwaite IJ, Abdul-Jabar HB, Sarraf KM. Un- derstanding of intra-operative tourniquets amongst ortho- paedic surgeons and theatre staff--a questionnaire study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010;92:243-5.
  3. Klenerman L, Biswas M, Hulands GH, Rhodes AM. Sys- temic and local effects of the application of a tourniquet. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1980;62:385-8.
  4. Yalçınkaya M, Sökücü S, Erdoğan S, Kabukçuoğlu YS. Tourniquet use in orthopedic surgery: a descriptive survey study among Turkish orthopedic surgeons and residents in Istanbul. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2014;48:483-90.
  5. Oragui E, Parsons A, White T, Longo UG, Khan WS. Tourniquet use in upper limb surgery. Hand (N Y) 2011;6:165,73. Graham B, Breault MJ, McEwen JA, McGraw RW. Occlu- sion of arterial flow in the extremities at subsystolic pres- sures through the use of wide tourniquet cuffs. Clin Or- thop Relat Res 1993;286:257-61.
  6. Pedowitz RA, Gershuni DH, Schmidt AH, Fridén J, Rydevik BL, Hargens AR. Muscle injury induced beneath and distal to a pneumatic tourniquet: a quantitative ani- mal study of effects of tourniquet pressure and duration. J Hand Surg Am 1991;16:610-21.
  7. Younger AS, McEwen JA, Inkpen K. Wide contoured thigh cuffs and automated limb occlusion measurement allow lower tourniquet pressures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;428:286-93.
  8. Crenshaw AG, Hargens AR, Gershuni DH, Rydevik B. Wide tourniquet cuffs more effective at lower inflation pressures. Acta Orthop Scand 1988;59:447-51.
  9. McEwen JA, Inkpen K. Tourniquet safety preventing skin injuries. Surgical Technol 2002;34:6-15.
  10. Sharma JP, Salhotra R. Tourniquets in orthopedic surgery. Indian J Orthop 2012;46:377-83.
  11. Fitzgibbons PG, Digiovanni C, Hares S, Akelman E. Safe tourniquet use: a review of the evidence. J Am Acad Or- thop Surg 2012;20:310-9.
  12. Mittal P, Shenoy S, Sandhu JS. Effect of different cuff widths on the motor nerve conduction of the median nerve: an experimental study. J Orthop Surg Res 2008;3:1. AORN Recommended Practices Committee. Recommend- ed practices for the use of the pneumatic tourniquet in the perioperative practice setting. AORN J 2007;86:640-55.
  13. Kam PC, Kavanagh R, Yoong FF. The arterial tourniquet: pathophysiological consequences and anaesthetic implica- tions. Anaesthesia 2001;56:534-45. Daruwa