Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

Treatment of infected nonunion of the juxta-articular region of the distal tibia

Pages
139–146
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Every patient should be evaluated according to their infection level and bony defects for reconstruction

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study was to summarize our clinical results with distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of infected tibial nonunion around the ankle joint.Methods: Between 1994 and 2009, 13 patients with a mean age of 50 years (range: 27-79 years) underwent tibial reconstruction for the treatment of infected nonunion of the distal tibia, with a mean bone loss of 4.8 cm (range: 1-7 cm).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Lengthening over an intramedullary nail as a second procedure was used in 2 patients, bifocal compression and distraction technique in 5 cases, compression with Ilizarov external fixator in 5 cases, and Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF, Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) in 1 case.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Every patient should be evaluated according to their infection level and bony defects for reconstruction
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to summarize our clinical results with distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of infected tibial nonunion around the ankle joint.Methods: Between 1994 and 2009, 13 patients with a mean age of 50 years (range: 27-79 years) underwent tibial reconstruction for the treatment of infected nonunion of the distal tibia, with a mean bone loss of 4.8 cm (range: 1-7 cm). Lengthening over an intramedullary nail as a second procedure was used in 2 patients, bifocal compression and distraction technique in 5 cases, compression with Ilizarov external fixator in 5 cases, and Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF, Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) in 1 case. At final follow-up, functional and radiographic results were evaluated according to Paley's bone and functional healing criteria.Results: Mean duration of follow-up was 36 months. Mean external fixation time was 198 days, and mean external fixation index was 29 days/cm. According to Paley's bone healing criteria, there were 10 excellent, 2 good, and 1 poor result(s); additionally, according to Paley's functional healing criteria, there were 5 excellent, 6 good, and 2 fair results. There were 11 problems, 5 obstacles, and 1 sequel according to Paley's classification of complications. There was 1 persisting nonunion, which underwent revision with a retrograde intramedullary nail.Conclusion: External fixator and/or combined treatment are effective and reliable methods to treat infected nonunion of the distal tibia. Every patient should be evaluated according to their infection level and bony defects for reconstruction

🔖

Cite This Article

ERALP, İ. L., KOCAOĞLU, M., DİKMEN, G., AZAM, M. E., BALCI, H. İ., BİLEN, F. E. (2016). Treatment of infected nonunion of the juxta-articular region of the distal tibia. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 139–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/354588

References (13)

  1. Kabata T, Tsuchiya H, Sakurakichi K, Yamashiro T, Wata- nabe K, Tomita K. Reconstruction with distraction os- teogenesis for juxta-articular nonunions with bone loss. J Trauma 2005;58:1213-22.
  2. Lonner JH, Koval KJ, Golyakhovsky V, Frankel VH. Post- traumatic nonunion of the distal tibial metaphysis. Treat- ment using the Ilizarov circular external fixator. Am J Or- thop (Belle Mead NJ) 1995;Suppl:16-21.
  3. Tsuchiya H, Tomita K, Minematsu K, Mori Y, Asada N, Kitano S. Limb salvage using distraction osteogenesis. A classification of the technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:403-11.
  4. Paley D, Catagni MA, Argnani F, Villa A, Benedetti GB, Cattaneo R. Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;241:146-65.
  5. Eralp L, Kocaoglu M. Distal tibial reconstruction with use of a circular external fixator and an intramedullary nail. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90 Suppl 2 Pt 2:181-94. Cierny G 3rd, Mader JT, Penninck JJ. A clinical staging system for adult osteomyelitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;414:7-24.
  6. Paley D, Maar DC. Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects. J Orthop Trauma 2000;14:76-85.
  7. Kocaoglu M, Eralp L, Rashid HU, Sen C, Bilsel K. Recon- struction of segmental bone defects due to chronic osteo- myelitis with use of an external fixator and an intramedul- lary nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:2137-45. Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;250:81-104.
  8. Eralp L, Kocaoglu M, Yusof NM, Bulbul M. Distal tibial reconstruction with use of a circular external fixator and an intramedullary nail. The combined technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:2218-24. Rhinelander FW. Tibial blood supply in relation to frac- ture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1974;105:34-81.
  9. Mosheiff R, Safran O, Segal D, Liebergall M. The un- reamed tibial nail in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures. Injury 1999;30:83-90.
  10. Mandt PR, Gershuni DH. Treatment of nonunion of frac- tures in the epiphyseal-metaphyseal region of long bones. J Orthop Trauma 1987;1:141-51.
  11. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Paremain G, Bhave A. Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail. A matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1464-80.
  12. Giannoudis PV, Faour O, Goff T, Kanakaris N, Dimitriou R. Masquelet technique for the treatment of bone defects: tips-tricks and future directions. Injury 2011;42:591-8.
  13. Paley D, Lamm BM, Kats