SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2011 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

Anatomical frame plate osteosynthesis in Ada-Miller Type 2 or 4 scapula fractures

Ada-Miller tip 2 ve tip 4 skapula kırıklarında anatomik çerçeve plak uygulaması

İrfan ESENKAYA
Koray ÜNAY
Pages
156–161
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Osteosynthesis with anatomical frame plates appears to be a safe method that allows early range of motion and that provides excellent results in Ada and Miller Type 2 or 4 scapula fractures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the results of anatomical frame plate osteosynthesis in patients with Ada and Miller Type 2 or 4 scapula fractures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Eleven Ada and Miller Type 2 or 4 scapula fractures in nine patients were treated with anatomical frame plate osteosynthesis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Osteosynthesis with anatomical frame plates appears to be a safe method that allows early range of motion and that provides excellent results in Ada and Miller Type 2 or 4 scapula fractures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kırık tespiti · internal · Kemik plakları

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the results of anatomical frame plate osteosynthesis in patients with Ada and Miller Type 2 or 4 scapula fractures. Methods: Eleven Ada and Miller Type 2 or 4 scapula fractures in nine patients were treated with anatomical frame plate osteosynthesis. The mean follow-up time was 39.8 (12–77) months. The results were evaluated using the Herscovici score. Results: No complications, such as neurovascular injury, postoperative hematoma, infection, delayed wound healing, implant failure, delayed union, or nonunion occurred. Based on the Herscovici score, the results were excellent. Conclusion: Osteosynthesis with anatomical frame plates appears to be a safe method that allows early range of motion and that provides excellent results in Ada and Miller Type 2 or 4 scapula fractures.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Ada ve Miller Tip 2 ve 4 skapula kırıklarının anatomik çerçeve plak ile tedavi sonuçlarının prospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Çalışma planı: Dokuz hastada 11 Ada ve Miller Tip 2 veya 4 skapula kırığı anatomik çerçeve plak ile tedavi edildi. Ortalama takip süresi 39.8 (12-77) ay idi. Sonuçlar Herscovici skoru ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Nörovasküler yaralanma, ameliyat sonrası hematom, yüzeyel veya derin enfeksiyon, yara yeri iyileşme gecikmesi, implant yetersizliği, kaynama gecikmesi veya kaynamama gibi komplikasyonlar görülmedi. Herscovici skoruna göre sonuçlar mükemmeldi. Çıkarımlar: Anatomik çerçeve plaklama Ada ve Miller Tip 2 veya 4 skapula gövde ve glenoid boyun kırıklarında erken harekete izin veren ve mükemmel sonuçlar sağlayan bir osteosentez yöntemi olarak göze çarpmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ESENKAYA, İ., ÜNAY, K. (2011). Anatomical frame plate osteosynthesis in Ada-Miller Type 2 or 4 scapula fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 156–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/354438

References (19)

  1. McGinnis M, Denton JR. Fractures of the scapula: a retro spective study of 40 fractured scapulae. J Trauma 1989;29: 1488-93
  2. Lindholm A, Leven H. Prognosis in fractures of the body and neck of the scapula. A follow-up study. Acta Chir Scand 1974;140:33-6
  3. Herscovici D Jr, Fiennes AG, Allgöwer M, Rüedi TP. The floating shoulder: ipsilateral clavicle and scapular neck frac tures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:362-4
  4. Ramos L, Mencía R, Alonso A, Ferrández L. Conservative treatment of ipsilateral fractures of the scapula and clavicle. J Trauma 1997;42:239-42
  5. Edwards SG, Whittle AP, Wood GW 2nd. Nonoperative treatment of ipsilateral fractures of the scapula and clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:774-80
  6. Egol KA, Connor PM, Karunakar MA, Sims SH, Bosse MJ, Kellam JF. The floating shoulder: clinical and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1188-94
  7. Thompson DA, Flynn TC, Miller PW, Fischer RP. The sig nificance of scapular fractures. J Trauma 1985;25:974-7
  8. Imatani RJ. Fractures of the scapula: a review of 53 frac tures. J Trauma 1975;15:473-8
  9. Wilber MC, Evans EB. Fractures of the scapula. An analy sis of forty cases and a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:358-62
  10. Ada JR, Miller ME. Scapular fractures. Analysis of 113 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;(269):174-80
  11. Leung KS, Lam TP. Open reduction and internal fixation of ipsilateral fractures of the scapular neck and clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:1015-8
  12. Tarhan O, Arkan C, Tolun U, Buluç L. Scapular fractures. [Article in Turkish] Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2000;11:42-4
  13. Martin SD, Weiland AJ. Missed scapular fracture after trau ma. A case report and a 23-year follow-up report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;(299):259-62
  14. Esenkaya I. Surgical treatment of scapular fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2003;37:33-40
  15. Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M, Zelle BA, Kregor PJ, Cole PA. Treatment of scapula fractures: systematic review of 520 fractures in 22 case series. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:230-3
  16. McGahan JP, Rab GT, Dublin A. Fractures of the scapula. J Trauma 1980;20:880-3
  17. Adam FF. Surgical treatment of displaced fractures of the glenoid cavity. Int Orthop 2002;26:150-3
  18. Li WJ, Liang XJ, Cheng DG, Lu XY, Zhang L, Li HH. Surgery for scapular neck displaced fracture. [Article in Chinese] Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2006;86:1615-9
  19. Oh W, Jeon IH, Kyung S, Park C, Kim T, Ihn C. The treat ment of double disruption of the supe