SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2017 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2

A novel computer-based method for measuring the acetabular angle on hip radiographs

Seda ŞAHİN
MURAT EMİN AKATA
ORÇUN ŞAHİN
İSMAİL CENGİZ TUNCAY
Hüseyin ÖZKAN
Pages
155–159
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to propose a new computer based method for measuring acetabularangles on hip radiographs and to assess its practicality, sensitivity and reliability for acetabular anglemeasurement.Methods: A total of 314 acetabulum were assessed on 157 pelvic X-ray images.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Acetabular angles weremeasured with both the conventional method (Method 1) and our proposed method (Method 2).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to propose a new computer based method for measuring acetabularangles on hip radiographs and to assess its practicality, sensitivity and reliability for acetabular anglemeasurement.Methods: A total of 314 acetabulum were assessed on 157 pelvic X-ray images. Acetabular angles weremeasured with both the conventional method (Method 1) and our proposed method (Method 2). All theAcetabular Index (AI) angle, Acetabular Angle (AA) and Acetabular Center (ACM) angle were measuredwith both methods.Results: The mean AI angle for Method 1 is 11.02± 2.7and the mean AI angle for Method 2 is10.08± 1.88, the mean AA angle for Method 1 is 39.5± 5.3and the mean AA angle for Method 2 is39.36± 4.68, the mean ACM angle for Method 1 is 50.5± 6.01and the mean ACM angle for Method 2is 55.42± 12.43.Conclusion: Our novel automated method appear to be reliable and practical for acetabular anglemeasurement on hip radiographs.Level of Evidence: Level III, Diagnostic study© 2017 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, S., AKATA, M. E., ŞAHİN, O., TUNCAY, İ. C., ÖZKAN, H. (2017). A novel computer-based method for measuring the acetabular angle on hip radiographs. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2, 155–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/354392

References (12)

  1. Campbell SE. Radiography of the hip: lines, signs, and patterns of disease. Semin Roentgenol. 2005
  2. 290e319. Swagerty Jr DL, Hellinger D. Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2001
  3. 279e286. Goker B, Gonen E, Demirag MD, Block JA. QuantiŞcation of the radiographic joint space width of the ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009
  4. 2083e2089. Tonnis D. Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of X-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976:39e47. Sharp I. Acetabular dysplasia. The acetabular angle. J Bone Jt Surg [Br]. 1961
  5. 268e272. Idelberger K, Frank A. Uber eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung des Pfan- nendachwinkels beim Jugendlichen und Erwachsenen (in German). Z Orthop. 1952
  6. 571e577. Lee YK, Chung CY, Koo KH, Lee KM, Kwon DG, Park MS. Measuring acetabular dysplasia in plain radiographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011
  7. 1219e1226. Al-Bashir AK, Al-Abed M, Abu Sharkh FM, Kordeya MN, Rousan FM. Algorithm for automatic angles measurement and screening for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH). In: Conference Proceedings:.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference 2015. 2015:6386e6389. Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaule PE, et al. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. Journal Bone Jt Surg. American Volume. 2008
  8. 90(4):47e66. Conrozier T, Brandt K, Piperno M, Mathieu P, Merle-Vincent F, Vignon E. Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of a new method of computer mea- surement of joint space width in hip osteoarthritis. Performance of three radiographic views obtained at a 3-year interval. Osteoarthr Cartilage/OARS Osteoarthr Res Soc. 2009
  9. 864e870. Engesaeter IO, Laborie LB, Lehmann TG, et al. RadiologicalŞndings for hip dysplasia at skeletal maturity. Validation of digital and manual measurement techniques. Skelet Radiol. 2012
  10. 775e785. Nagao Y, Aoki H, Ishii SJ, Masuda T, Beppu M. Radiographic method to measure the inclination angle of the acetabulum. J Orthop Sci: OfŞcial Journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. 2008
  11. 62e71. Pedersen DR, Lamb CA, Dolan LA, Ralston HM, Weinstein SL, Morcuende JA. Radiographic measurements in developmental dysplasia of the hip: reliability and validity of a digitizing program. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004
  12. 156e160. van der List JP, Witbreuk MM, Buizer AI, van der Sluijs JA. The prognostic value of the h