Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2001 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of transosseous suture and suture anchors in the fixation of rotator cuff tears: A biomechanical experimental study

Transosseöz dikiş ve dikiş ankorlar ile rotator manşet tamirlerinin karşılaştırılması: Biyomekanik deneysel çalışma

Pages
169–174
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that group 4 was significantly weaker than the other groups (p<0.001), that the strength of the transosseous suture improved with double sutures (group 1 vs group 2 p=0.002), and that augmentation of the lateral cortex with a metal plate did not improve strength (group 1 vs group 3, p=0.07).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study was designed to compare the primary fixation strength of transosseous sutures and suture anchors in rotator cuff repair.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In each group, infraspinatus tendons were cut from their insertions and reattached with four diverse techniques, which included a single Mason-Allen stitch (group 1), double Mason-Allen stitches (group 2), double Mason-Allen stitches knotted on the lateral cortex followed by augmentation with a mini metal plate (group 3), and two Corkscrew suture anchors (Arthrex, Germany) (group 4).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that group 4 was significantly weaker than the other groups (p<0.001), that the strength of the transosseous suture improved with double sutures (group 1 vs group 2 p=0.002), and that augmentation of the lateral cortex with a metal plate did not improve strength (group 1 vs group 3, p=0.07).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biyomekanik · Omuz eklemi · Koyun

Abstract

Objectives: This study was designed to compare the primary fixation strength of transosseous sutures and suture anchors in rotator cuff repair. Methods: Thirty-two sheep shoulders were divided into four homogeneously equal groups. In each group, infraspinatus tendons were cut from their insertions and reattached with four diverse techniques, which included a single Mason-Allen stitch (group 1), double Mason-Allen stitches (group 2), double Mason-Allen stitches knotted on the lateral cortex followed by augmentation with a mini metal plate (group 3), and two Corkscrew suture anchors (Arthrex, Germany) (group 4). All specimens were tested for fixation strengths with a Material Testing System machine. Statistical analyses were made using one-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc tests. Results: The mean failure load values were 160.31±34.59 N, 199.36±11.73 N, 182.35±19.19 N, and 108.32±15.98 N in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (ANOVA, F=24.63, p<0.001). It was found that group 4 was significantly weaker than the other groups (p<0.001), that the strength of the transosseous suture improved with double sutures (group 1 vs group 2 p=0.002), and that augmentation of the lateral cortex with a metal plate did not improve strength (group 1 vs group 3, p=0.07). Conclusion: We concluded that rotator cuff fixation with only suture anchors cannot provide a reliable strength and that fixation must include multiple sutures if only transoosseous sutures are to be used.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma rotator manşet cerrahisinde değişik transosseöz dikiş teknikleri ve dikiş ankorlarını biyomekanik olarak karşılaştırmak amacıyla planlandı. Çalışma planı: Otuz iki adet yeni kesilmiş koyun omzu, her birinde sekizer adet olmak üzere homojen olarak dört gruba ayrıldı. Humerustan total olarak ayrılan infraspinatus tendonları, dört farklı yöntemle tamir edildi. Tamirler grup 1’de tek Mason-Allen dikişi ile, grup 2’de iki Mason-Allen dikişi ile yapıldı. Grup 3’te kemik tünellerin lateral korteksteki uçlarının arasındaki köprü, plak ile desteklendi. Grup 4’te iki adet Corkscrew ankor ile tamir yapıldı. Kemik-tendon tamir kompleksine, materyal test cihazında gerilme deneyi uygulandı ve en yüksek dayanma kuvveti belirlendi. İstatistiksel analizler tek yönlü ANOVA testi ve LSD post hoc ile yapıldı. Sonuçlar: Ortalama en yüksek dayanma kuvvetleri gruplarda sırasıyla 160.31±34.59 N, 199.36±11.73 N, 182.35±19.19 N ve 108.32±15.98 N bulundu (ANOVA, F=24.63, p

🔖

Cite This Article

ATALAR, A. C., DEMİRHAN, M., BOZDAĞ, E., AKALIN, Y., ARPACI, A. (2001). Comparison of transosseous suture and suture anchors in the fixation of rotator cuff tears: A biomechanical experimental study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 169–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/354321

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Rossouw DJ, McElroy BJ, Amis AA, Emery RJ. A biomechanical evaluation of suture anchors in repair of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1997;79:458-61. 2. Warner JJ, Greis PE. The treatment of stiffness of the shoulder after repair of the rotator cuff. Instr Course Lect 1998;47:67-75. 3. Cofield RH. Rotator cuff disease of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1985;67:974-9. 4. Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Beck M, Schlegel U. Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994;76:371-80. 5. Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Perren SM, Nyffeler RW. Experimental rotator cuff repair. A preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1999;81:1281-90. 6. Hecker AT, Shea M, Hayhurst JO, Myers ER, Meeks LW, Hayes WC. Pull-out strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff and Bankart lesion repairs. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21:874-9. 7. Reed SC, Glossop N, Ogilvie-Harris DJ. Full-thickness rotator cuff tears. A biomechanical comparison of suture versus bone anchor techniques. Am J Sports Med 1996;24:46-8. 8. Craft DV, Moseley JB, Cawley PW, Noble PC. Fixation strength of rotator cuff repairs with suture anchors and the transosseous suture technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996; 5:32-40. 9. Burkhart SS, Johnson TC, Wirth MA, Athanasiou KA. Cyclic loading of transosseous rotator cuff repairs: tension overload as a possible cause of failure. Arthroscopy 1997;13:172-6. 10. Burkhart SS, Diaz Pagan JL, Wirth MA, Athanasiou KA. Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation. Arthroscopy 1997;13:720-4. 11. Burkhart SS. A stepwise approach to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair based on biomechanical principles. Arthroscopy 2000;16:82-90. 12. Sward L, Hughes JS, Amis A, Wallace WA. The strength of surgical repairs of the rotator cuff. A biomechanical study on cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74:585-8. 13. France EP, Paulos LE, Harner CD, Straight CB. Biomechanical evaluation of rotator cuff fixation methods. Am J Sports Med 1989;17:176-81. 14. Burkhart SS, Fischer SP, Nottage WM, Esch JC, Barber FA, Doctor D, et al. Tissue fixation security in transosseous rotator cuff repairs: a mechanical comparison of simple versus mattress sutures. Arthroscopy 1996;12:704-8. 15. Caldwell GL, Warner JP, Miller MD, Boardman D, Towers J, Debski R. Strength of fixation with transosseous sutures in rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997;79: 1064