Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2002 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

The importance of predicted risk factors in developmental hip dysplasia: An ultrasonographic screening program

Gelişimsel kalça displazisi tanısında bilinen risk faktörlerinin önemi: Seçici ultrasonagrafik tarama

Pages
106–110
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Our data suggest that risk factors are important for early diagnosis of DDH, and that, due to detection of abnormal ultrasonography findings among newborns who had been found normal on clinical examination, screening of all newborns with ultrasonography seems to be essential regardless of the presence of any risk factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To evaluate the role of the risk factors in the diagnosis of developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) by ultrasonographic screening.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The hips of 327 newborns (151 females, 176 males) with identifiable risk factors including family history (n=20), congenital muscular torticollis (n=19), oligohydramniosis (n=2), breech presentation (n=51), multiple gestation (n=6), pes calcaneovalgus (n=74), clubfoot (n=152), and postural metatarsus adductus (n=3) were examined clinically on the first day of life and by ultrasonography within two weeks after birth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Our data suggest that risk factors are important for early diagnosis of DDH, and that, due to detection of abnormal ultrasonography findings among newborns who had been found normal on clinical examination, screening of all newborns with ultrasonography seems to be essential regardless of the presence of any risk factors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kalça çıkığı · Süt çocuğu · yenidoğan

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the role of the risk factors in the diagnosis of developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) by ultrasonographic screening. Methods: The hips of 327 newborns (151 females, 176 males) with identifiable risk factors including family history (n=20), congenital muscular torticollis (n=19), oligohydramniosis (n=2), breech presentation (n=51), multiple gestation (n=6), pes calcaneovalgus (n=74), clubfoot (n=152), and postural metatarsus adductus (n=3) were examined clinically on the first day of life and by ultrasonography within two weeks after birth. The hips were evaluated according to the Graf method. Results: Clinical examination of 239 newborns were normal. Of these, sonographic abnormalities were found in 15 newborns (6.3%). On the other hand, out of 88 newborns who were found clinically abnormal, ultrasonography findings were normal in 24 cases (%27). According to the Graf method, of 654 hips, 550 were type 1, 81 were type 2a, 15 were type 2c, five were type D, two were type 3a, and one was type 4. Treatment was required for only 19 infants (5.8%), four of whom had been found normal on clinical examination. Conclusion: Our data suggest that risk factors are important for early diagnosis of DDH, and that, due to detection of abnormal ultrasonography findings among newborns who had been found normal on clinical examination, screening of all newborns with ultrasonography seems to be essential regardless of the presence of any risk factors.

Özet

Amaç: Gelişimsel kalça displazisinin (GKD) erken tanısında risk faktörlerinin önemini ultrasonografik değerlendirme ile ortaya koymak. Çalışma planı: Ailede GKD öyküsü (n=20), tortikollis (n=19), oligohidramnios (n=2), makat gelişi (n=51), çoğul gebelik (n=3), pes kalkaneovalgus (n=74), pes ekinovarus (n=152), postural metatarsus adduktus (n=3) gibi tanımlanabilir risk faktörü taşıyan 327 yenidoğanın (151 kız, 176 erkek) kalçaları yaşamın ilk günü içerisinde klinik olarak ve yaşamın ilk iki haftası içerisinde de ultrasonografi ile incelendi. Kalçalar Graf yöntemine göre değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Olguların 239'unda klinik muayene bulguları normaldi; bunların 15'inde (%6.3) ultrasonografide anomalite saptandı. Klinik olarak anormal bulunan 88 yenidoğanın ultrasonografik incelemesinde 24 olgu (%27) normal bulundu. Graf yöntemine göre sınıflandırıldığında 654 kalçanın 550'sinde tip 1, 81'inde tip 2a, 15'inde tip 2c, beşinde tip D, ikisinde tip 3a ve birinde tip 4 kalça saptandı. Tedavi yalnız 19 bebek (%5.8) için gerekli görüldü. Bu 19 bebekten dördünün ilk klinik muayenesi normaldi. Çıkarımlar: Bulgularımız, risk faktörlerinin GKD erken tanısında önemli olduğunu; klinik muayenesi normal olan olgularda da anormallik gösterebilmesi nedeniyle ultraso-nografi ile yapılan seçici taramanın, sadece klinik muayene ile yapılan taramadan daha değerli olduğunu, bu nedenle yalnız risk gruplarının değil tüm yenidoğanların ultrasonografi ile taranması gerektiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAPINAR, L., SÜRENKÖK, F., ÖZTÜRK, H., US, M. R., YURDAKUL, L. (2002). The importance of predicted risk factors in developmental hip dysplasia: An ultrasonographic screening program. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 106–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/354309

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Boeree NR, Clarke NM. Ultrasound imaging and secondary screening for congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1994;76:525-33
  2. Demirhan M, Şar C, Aydınok HÇ, Çakmak M, Çoban A. Do- ğumsal kalça çıkığının tanısında ultrasonografi. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1994;28:8-14
  3. Hiertonn T, James U. Congenital dislocation of the hip. Experiences of early diagnosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1968;50:542-5
  4. Oğuz T, Ege A, Güngür Ş, Toppare MT, Erdemtok N. 1099 bebeğin Graf yöntemi ile ultrasonografik deÛerlendirilmesi. Artroplasti Artroskopik Cer 1996;7:64-6
  5. Söyüncü Y, Özdemir H, Akyıldız FF, Ürgüden M, Altınel E. Antalya ve yöresinde ultrasonografik gelişimsel kalça displazisi taraması. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1999;33:105-9
  6. Tümer Y, Ömeroğlu H. Türkiye'de gelişimsel kalça displazisinin önlenmesi. Acta Orthop Traumataol Turc 1997;31:176-81
  7. Dunn PM, Evans RE, Thearle MJ, Griffiths HE, Witherow PJ. Congenital dislocation of the hip: early and late diagnosis and management compared. Arch Dis Child 1985;60:407-14
  8. Clarke NM, Clegg J, Al-Chalabi AN. Ultrasound screening of hips at risk for CDH. Failure to reduce the incidence of late cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1989;71:9-12 9. Garvey M, Donoghue VB, Gorman WA, O'Brien N, Murphy JF. Radiographic screening at four months of infants at risk for congenital hip dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74:704-7
  9. Tachdjian MO. Pediatric orthopedics. Vol. 1, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1990
  10. Graf R. The diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic Combound treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1980;97:117-33
  11. Bialik V, Fishman J, Katzir J, Zeltzer M. Clinical assessment of hip instability in the newborn by an orthopedic surgeon and a pediatrician. J Pediatr Orthop 1986;6:703-5
  12. Poul J, Bajerova J, Sommernitz M, Straka M, Pokorny M, Wong FY. Early diagnosis of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74:695-700
  13. Tönnis D, Storch K, Ulbrich H. Results of newborn screening for CDH with and without sonography and correlation of risk factors. J Pediatr Orthop 1990;10:145-52
  14. Mitchell GP. Problems in the early diagnosis and management of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1972;54:4-12. 16.Williamson J. Difficulties of early diagnosis and treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip in Northern Ireland. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1972;54:13-7
  15. Ramsey PL, Lasser S, MacEwen GD. Congenit