Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2006 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1

Contribution of biomechanics to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Biyomekaniğin ön çapraz bağ rekonstrüksiyonuna katkıları

Pages
94–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the future role of biomechanics to facilitate in vivo data for further improvement of ACL reconstruction will be discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For years, bioengineers and orthopedic surgeons have applied the principles of biomechanics to gain valuable information about the complex function of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), as well as to improve the design of replacement grafts for ACL reconstruction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:New experimental tools, such as robotic testing systems and mathematical models have been used to measure the multiple degree-of-freedom (DOF) knee kinematics, in situ forces, and biomechanical properties of the ACL.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the future role of biomechanics to facilitate in vivo data for further improvement of ACL reconstruction will be discussed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Diz eklemi · Biyomekanik · Ön çapraz bağ

Abstract

For years, bioengineers and orthopedic surgeons have applied the principles of biomechanics to gain valuable information about the complex function of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), as well as to improve the design of replacement grafts for ACL reconstruction. New experimental tools, such as robotic testing systems and mathematical models have been used to measure the multiple degree-of-freedom (DOF) knee kinematics, in situ forces, and biomechanical properties of the ACL. This manuscript will review specific examples of how biomechanics has impacted surgical reconstruction of the ACL by improving technical factors such as graft selection, tunnel placement, initial graft tension, graft fixation, and graft tunnel healing. Evolution of the single-bundle ACL reconstruction to the more anatomical double-bundle reconstruction will be featured. Finally, the future role of biomechanics to facilitate in vivo data for further improvement of ACL reconstruction will be discussed.

Özet

Ortopedik cerrahlar ve biyomühendisler, biyomekaniği yıllardır ön çapraz bağın (ÖÇB) karmaşık yapısı hakkında bilgi edinme ve daha iyi bir ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonu yöntemi geliştirmede kullanmışlardır. Matematik modeller ve robotik test sistemleri gibi yeni yöntemler, çoklu serbestlik derecesinde diz kinematiğini, in situ kuvvetleri ve ÖÇB’nin biyomekanik özelliklerini ölçmede kullanılmıştır. Bu derlemede, örnekler verilerek biyomekaniğin, greft seçimi, tünel yerleşimi, başlangıç greft gerginliği, tespit yöntemleri ve tünel-greft iyileşmesi gibi ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonunun önemli noktalarının gelişimine nasıl katkıda bulunduğu vurgulanacaktır. Ayrıca, tek bant ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonundan, daha anatomik olan çift bant ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonuna geçiş irdelenecektir. Son olarak, gelecekte biyomekaniğin, ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonunun daha başarılı hale getirilebilmesinde, özellikle in vivo verileri kullanarak, nasıl katkıda bulunabileceği tartışılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

WOO, S. L., KARAOĞLU, S., DEDE, Ö. (2006). Contribution of biomechanics to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1, 94–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/354159

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anderson AF, Snyder RB, Lipscomb AB Jr. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods. Am J Sports Med 2001;29:272-9
  2. Aune AK, Holm I, Risberg MA, Jensen HK, Steen H. Fourstrand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A randomized study with two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2001;29:722-8
  3. Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft followed by accelerated rehabilitation. A two- to nine-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 1997;25:786-95
  4. Shelbourne KD, Trumper RV. Preventing anterior knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1997;25:41-7
  5. Herrington L, Wrapson C, Matthews M, Matthews H. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, hamstring versus bone-patella tendon-bone grafts: a systematic literature review of outcome from surgery. Knee 2005;12:41-50
  6. Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, Luetzow WF, Csintalan RP, Phelan D, et al. Prospective trial of a treatment algorithm for the management of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Am J Sports Med 2005;33:335-46
  7. Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SL, Yagi M, Debski RE. Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res 2004;22:85-9
  8. Sakane M, Fox RJ, Woo SL, Livesay GA, Li G, Fu FH. In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res 1997;15:285-93
  9. Fukuda Y, Woo SL, Loh JC, Tsuda E, Tang P, McMahon PJ, et al. A quantitative analysis of valgus torque on the ACL: a human cadaveric study. J Orthop Res 2003;21:1107-12
  10. Fujie H, Livesay GA, Woo SL, Kashiwaguchi S, Blomstrom G. The use of a universal force-moment sensor to determine in-situ forces in ligaments: a new methodology. J Biomech Eng 1995;117:1-7
  11. Woo SL, Debski RE, Wong EK, Yagi M, Tarinelli D. Use of robotic technology for diathrodial joint research. J Sci Med Sport 1999;2:283-97
  12. Rudy TW, Livesay GA, Woo SL, Fu FH. A combined robotic/ universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligaments. J Biomech 1996;29:1357-60
  13. Kanamori A, Woo SL, Ma CB, Zeminski J, Rudy TW, Li G, et al. The forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and knee kinematics during a simulated pivot shift test: A human cadaveric study using robotic technology. Arthroscopy 2000; 16:633-9