SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2011 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4

Suction drainage influence on knee effusion following partial meniscectomy with partial fat pad or synovium resection

Dren kullanımınız parsiyel yağ yastığı eksizyonu ve sinovektomi ile birlikte yapılan menisektomi sonrası diz efüzyonu üzerine etkisi

Kaya AKAN
Koray ÜNAY
Levent BERKEM
Melih GÜVEN
Oğuz POYANLI
Pages
221–224
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Use of a suction drain did not influence the postoperative effusion or the clinical course of the effusion after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy with partial fat pad removal or synovectomy

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of our study was to examine the effect of suction drains on knee after arthro scopic partial meniscectomy with partial fat pad removal or synovectomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We performed arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for posterior tears of the medial meniscus and partial fat pad or synovium shaving in 72 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Use of a suction drain did not influence the postoperative effusion or the clinical course of the effusion after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy with partial fat pad removal or synovectomy
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yağ dokusu · Artroskopi · Eksuda ve transüdalar

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to examine the effect of suction drains on knee after arthro scopic partial meniscectomy with partial fat pad removal or synovectomy. Methods: We performed arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for posterior tears of the medial meniscus and partial fat pad or synovium shaving in 72 patients. Following surgery, a suction drain was not used in 40 patients (Group A) and used in 32 (Group B). Both groups were simi lar in terms of age, gender, and total operation time. The patients were evaluated at 1, 2, and 4 weeks postoperatively for the presence of a knee effusion. Results: No significant difference was observed in the grade of effusion and the average percent change in the effusion grade between Groups A and B at 1, 2, and 4 weeks postoperatively. Conclusion: Use of a suction drain did not influence the postoperative effusion or the clinical course of the effusion after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy with partial fat pad removal or synovectomy

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı, parsiyel yağ yastığı eksizyonu veya sinovektomi ile birlike yapılan artroskopik parsiyel menisektomi cerrahisi sonrası dren kullanımının diz efüzyonuna etkisini incelemekti. Çalışma planı: Medial menisküs yırtığı olan 72 hastaya artroskopik parsiyel menisektomi ve parsiyel yağ yastığı eksizyonu ya da parsiyel sinovektomi yapıldı. Cerrahi sonrası dren kullanılmayan 40 hasta Grup A, kullanılan 32 hasta ise Grup B olarak sınıflandırıldı. Yaş, cinsiyet ve toplam cerrahi süresi bakımından gruplar benzerdi. Diz efüzyonunu saptamak amacıyla hastalar ameliyat sonrası 1., 2. ve 4. haftalarda değerlendirildiler. Bulgular: Cerrahi sonrası 1., 2. ve 4. haftalarda Grup A ve B arasında efüzyon derecesi ve efüzyon derecesinde ortalama yüzde değişimi açısından anlamlı bir fark gözlenmedi. Çıkarımlar: Yağ yastığının kısmen eksize edildiği ya da sinovektomi yapılan artroskopik parsiyel menisektomi cerrahisi sonrası dren kullanımı ameliyat sonrası efüzyon veya efüzyonun klinik seyri açısından bir fark yaratmamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAN, K., ÜNAY, K., BERKEM, L., GÜVEN, M., POYANLI, O. (2011). Suction drainage influence on knee effusion following partial meniscectomy with partial fat pad or synovium resection. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4, 221–224. https://ajindex.com/articles/354032

References (10)

  1. Clifton R, Haleem S, McKee A, Parker MJ. Closed suction surgical wound drainage after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of randomised con trolled trials. Knee 2007;14:348-51
  2. Coupens SD, Yates CK. The effect of tourniquet use and hemovac drainage on postoperative hemarthrosis. Arthroscopy 1991;7:278-82
  3. Browett JP, Gibbs AN, Copeland SA, Deliss LJ. The use of suction drainage in the operation of meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1978;60:516-9
  4. Easley ME, Cushner FD. Arthroscopic meniscal resection. In: Insall JN, Scott WN, editors. Surgery of the knee. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2001. p. 473-520
  5. Johnson LL. Characteristics of the immediate postarthro scopic blood clot formation in the knee joint. Arthroscopy 1991;7:14-23
  6. Altman RD, Gray R. Diagnostic and therapeutic uses of the arthroscope in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Am J Med 1983;75:50-5
  7. Diduch DR, Shen FH, Ong BC, Musahl V, Fu F. Knee: diagnostic arthroscopy. In: Miller MD, Cole BJ, Cohen SB, Makda LA, editors. Textbook of arthroscopy. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. p. 471-88
  8. Parker MJ, Livingstone V, Clifton R, McKee A. Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007(3):CD00182
  9. Tria AJ. Clinical examination of the knee. In: Insall JN, Scott WN, editors. Surgery of the knee. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2001. p. 161-74
  10. Tatari H, Dervisbey M, Muratli K, Ergor A. Report of experience in 190 patients with the use of closed suction drainage in arthroscopic knee procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005;13:458-62.