Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2012 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

Diyafizer ve proksimal humerus kırıklarında minimal invaziv plak osteosentez (MİPO) uygulaması

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in diaphyseal humerus and proximal humerus fractures

Pages
154–160
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Early return of function in the shoulder and elbow joints and favorable healing time are the major advantages of this method in this rare subset of humerus fractures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the results of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using locking plates in diaphyseal humerus and proximal humerus fractures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Nine patients who underwent open reduction and MIPO for the treatment of diaphyseal and proximal humerus fractures between June 2006 and October 2009 were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Early return of function in the shoulder and elbow joints and favorable healing time are the major advantages of this method in this rare subset of humerus fractures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the results of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using locking plates in diaphyseal humerus and proximal humerus fractures. Methods: Nine patients who underwent open reduction and MIPO for the treatment of diaphyseal and proximal humerus fractures between June 2006 and October 2009 were included in this study. One S3® and 8 PHILOS® plates were used. Mean age was 75.2 (range: 32 to 86) years and all patients were females. Mean follow-up was 33.9 (range: 14.8 to 54.8) months. According to AO/ASIF classification, four patients had 12C1, two patients 12A1, one patient 12A2, and two patients 11A2 fractures. Axillary and radial nerves were explored and protected in all patients. Patients were evaluated radiographically for union and functionally using the Constant-Murley score. Results: None of the patients had nonunion, avascular necrosis, axillary or radial nerve paralysis or implant failure. Mean Constant-Murley score was 86.8±2.2 (range: 70 to 100). Mean union time was 3.2 (range: 2.5 to 5) months. Conclusion: MIPO of humerus diaphysis and proximal fractures allows for preservation of blood supply in fracture fragments, owing to less soft tissue and periosteal injury. When the procedure is performed with the lateral double incision, exposure and preservation of the axillary and radial nerves are necessary. Early return of function in the shoulder and elbow joints and favorable healing time are the major advantages of this method in this rare subset of humerus fractures.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı kilitli plak tespit uygulanan humerus diafiz ve proksimal humerus kırıklarında minimal invaziv plak osteosentez (MİPO) tekniği sonuçlarını değerlendirmekti. Çalışma planı: Haziran 2006 - Ekim 2009 tarihleri arasında humerus diafiz ve proksimal humerus kırıklarına açık redüksiyon uygulanan 9 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Bir hastada S3® proksimal humerus plağı, 8’inde PHILOS® plağı kullanıldı. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 75.2 (dağılım: 32-86) idi ve tamamı kadındı. Ortalama takip süresi 33.9 (dağılım: 14.8-54.8) ay olarak gerçekleşti. AO/ASIF sistemine göre dört hastada 12C1, iki hastada 12A1, bir hastada 12A2, ve iki hastada 11A2 tipi kırık vardı. Hastaların hepsinde aksiller ve radial sinir ortaya kondu ve korundu. Constant-Murley skoru ile fonksiyonel ve radyolojik olarak kaynama sonuçları değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hiçbir hastada kaynamama, implant yetmezliği, avasküler nekroz, aksiller ve radial sinir felci görülmedi. Ortalama Constant-Murley skoru 86.8±2.2 (dağılım: 70-100) idi. Kaynama süresi 3.2 (dağılım: 2.5-5) ay olarak kaydedildi. Çıkarımlar: Humerus diafiz ve proksimal uzanımlı diafiz kırıklarında MİPO uygulaması, kırık fragmanlarında daha az yumuşak doku ve periost hasarı ile kan akımının korunmasına neden olur. Lateral çift insizyonla yapılan bu uygulamada, aksiller ve radial siniri ortaya koymak ve korumak gereklidir. Omuz ve dirsek eklem fonksiyonlarının erken kazanılması, uygun iyileşme zamanı ve mükemmel fonksiyonel sonuçları ile bu tespit şekli, bu kırık tipinde avantajlı bir yöntemdir

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSU, N., KARACA, S., KARA, A. N., IŞIKLAR, Z. U. (2012). Diyafizer ve proksimal humerus kırıklarında minimal invaziv plak osteosentez (MİPO) uygulaması. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 154–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/354007

References (16)

  1. Miclau T, Martin RE. The evolution of modern plate osteosynthesis. Injury 1997;28 Suppl 1:A3-6
  2. Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:1093-110
  3. Rozbruch SR, Müller U, Gautier E, Ganz R. The evolution of femoral shaft plating technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;(354):195-208
  4. Baumgaertel F, Buhl M, Rahn BA. Fracture healing in biological plate osteosynthesis. Injury 1998;29 Suppl 3:C3-6
  5. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Guy P, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and vascularity: preliminary results of a cadaver injection study. Injury 1997;28 Suppl 1:A7-12
  6. Krettek C, Müller M, Miclau T. Evolution of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the femur. Injury 2001;32 Suppl 3:SC 14-23
  7. Wenda K, Runkel M, Degreif J, Rudig L. Minimally invasive plate fixation in femoral shaft fractures. Injury 1997;28 Suppl 1:A13-9
  8. A¤ufl H, Reiso¤lu A, Zincircio¤lu G, Eryanilmaz G. Treatment of intraarticular comminuted supracondylar femoral fractures by indirect plate osteosynthesis. [Article in Turkish] Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2002;36:384-9
  9. A¤ufl H, K›ranyaz Y, Sezen H, Eryan›lmaz G. Treatment of distal tibia fractures by biological plating. [Article in Turkish] Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1999;33:173-8
  10. Charles A, Rockwood Jr, David PG, Robert WB, James DH. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. Lippincott- Raven; 1996. p. 197-201
  11. Ring D, Jupiter JB. Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. In: Norris TR, editor. Orthopaedic knowledge update: shoulder and elbow. 2nd ed. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2002. p. 237-47
  12. Liporace FA. Fractures of the humeral shaft. In: Lieberman JR, editor. AAOS comprehensive orthopaedic review 2009. p. 563-68
  13. Zhiquan A, Bingfang Z, Yeming W, Chi Z, Peiyan H. Minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis (MIPO) of middle and distal third humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:628-33
  14. Rancan M, Dietrich M, Lamdark T, Can U, Platz A. Minimal invasive long PHILOS®-plate osteosynthesis in metadiaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus. Injury 2010;41:1277-83
  15. Lau TW, Leung F, Chan CF, Chow SP. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture. Int Orthop 2007;31:657-64
  16. Kobayashi M, Watanabe Y, Matsushita T. Early f