Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2014 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 4

Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in octogenarians

Pages
424–430
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, stable fixation of the posteromedial fragment is necessary to avoid stem subsidence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of bipolar hemiarthroplasty with cementless stem for the unstable intertrochanteric fracture in octogenarians and to determine the influencing factors associated with subsidence of the stem.Methods: The study included the 143 hips of 139 patients (119 females, 20 males).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mean followup period was 3.8 (range: 2.2 to 9.0) years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, stable fixation of the posteromedial fragment is necessary to avoid stem subsidence.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of bipolar hemiarthroplasty with cementless stem for the unstable intertrochanteric fracture in octogenarians and to determine the influencing factors associated with subsidence of the stem.Methods: The study included the 143 hips of 139 patients (119 females, 20 males). Mean followup period was 3.8 (range: 2.2 to 9.0) years. The displaced lesser trochanteric fragment was reduced anatomically and fixed with 16-gauge stainless steel cerclage wire. Clinical outcomes included Harris Hip Score (HHS), thigh pain, groin pain and walking ability. Radiographic outcomes included stem fixation and stability, osteolysis, heterotopic ossification and subsidence. The stable reduction group was determined when anatomic reduction of posteromedial fragments was achieved with <=1 mm gap of fragment.Results: Mean HHS was 82 (range: 78 to 99) at the final follow-up. Thirty-one hips (21.7%) experienced thigh pain and 19 (13.3%) groin pain. One hundred and twelve patients (80.6%) regained their pre-injury level of ambulation. All femoral stems showed osseointegration without aseptic loosening and osteolysis. The mean stem subsidence was 3.1±2.4 (range: 0 to 18) mm. The extent of subsidence was significantly higher in patients with unstable reduction. The survival rate was 94.2%.Conclusion: Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty appears to be a suitable method for the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in octogenarians. However, stable fixation of the posteromedial fragment is necessary to avoid stem subsidence.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIM, Y., MOON, J., HWANG, K., CHOI, I., KIM, Y. H. (2014). Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in octogenarians. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 4, 424–430. https://ajindex.com/articles/353992

References (13)

  1. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide preva- lence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:897-902.
  2. Haidukewych GJ, Berry DJ. Hip arthroplasty for salvage of failed treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:899-904.
  3. Lee YK, Ha YC, Chang BK, Kim KC, Kim TY, Koo KH. Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a hydroxyap- atite-coated long stem for osteoporotic unstable intertro- chanteric fractures. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:626-32.
  4. Rodop O, Kiral A, Kaplan H, Akmaz I. Primary bipolar hemiprosthesis for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop 2002;26:233-7.
  5. Grimsrud C, Monzon RJ, Richman J, Ries MD. Cemented hip arthroplasty with a novel cerclage cable technique for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:337-43.
  6. Kim SY, Kim YG, Hwang JK. Cementless calcar-re- placement hemiarthroplasty compared with intramed- ullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2186-92.
  7. Chen YT, Chen WM, Lee KS, Huang CK, Chiang CC, Chen TH. Diaphyseal locking hip arthroplasty for treat- ment of failed fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:241-6.
  8. Paul O, Barker JU, Lane JM, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Functional and radiographic outcomes of intertrochan- teric hip fractures treated with calcar reduction, compres- sion, and trochanteric entry nailing. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:148-54.
  9. Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Rosenberg AD, Bernstein RL, Zuckerman JD. Functional outcome after hip fracture. Effect of general versus regional anesthesia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;348:37-41. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after disloca- tion and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthro- plasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969;51:737-55.
  10. Engh CA, Glassman AH, Suthers KE. The case for po- rous-coated hip implants. The femoral side. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;261:63-81.
  11. Engh CA, Hooten JP Jr, Zettl-Schaffer KF, Ghaffarpour M, McGovern TF, Macalino GE, et al. Porous-coated total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;298:89-96.
  12. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of fail- ure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a ra- diographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979;141:17-27.
  13. Meijerink HJ, Gardeniers JW, Buma P, Lemmens JA, Sch- reurs BW. Hydroxyapatite does not improve the outcome of a bipolar hemiar