Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2008 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

Functional results of patients treated with modular prosthetic replacement for bone tumors of the extremities

Tümör rezeksiyon protezi uygulanan kemik tümörlü olgularda fonksiyonel sonuçlar

Pages
238–245
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Reconstruction with cemented modular endoprostheses is an appropriate surgical alternative in the treatment of large segmental defects after resection of extremity tumors, with satisfactory functional results particularly in primary tumors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: We evaluated functional results of patients who were treated with cemented modular prosthetic replacement for bone tumors of the extremities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 23 patients (12 males, 11 females; mean age 49 years; range 14-81 years) who underwent wide resection and cemented endoprosthetic replacement with the TMTS (Turkish Musculoskeletal Tumor Society) prosthesis for bone tumors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Reconstruction with cemented modular endoprostheses is an appropriate surgical alternative in the treatment of large segmental defects after resection of extremity tumors, with satisfactory functional results particularly in primary tumors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Protez implantasyonu · Protezler ve implantlar · Tedavi sonucu

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated functional results of patients who were treated with cemented modular prosthetic replacement for bone tumors of the extremities. Methods: The study included 23 patients (12 males, 11 females; mean age 49 years; range 14-81 years) who underwent wide resection and cemented endoprosthetic replacement with the TMTS (Turkish Musculoskeletal Tumor Society) prosthesis for bone tumors. Twelve patients (52.2%; mean age 63.5 years) had metastatic, 11 patients (47.8%; mean age 38 years) had primary tumors. The most common site of involvement was the femur (n=17), followed by the humerus (n=5). Functional evaluations were made with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system. The mean followup period was 24 months (range 1 to 108 months), being 30 months for primary, and 3 months for metastatic tumors. Results: Postoperative complications were seen in seven patients (30.4%), being local recurrences in three patients. During the follow-up period, 11 patients died due to tumoral causes, distant metastasis developed in three patients, and nine patients were tumor-free. Survival was significantly better in patients with primary tumors (p<0.001). All the patients were able to walk without crutches in the postoperative period. The mean MSTS score was 58.9% (range 40% to 90%) in survivors, which was 71.5% (range 60% to 90%) for primary tumors, and 47.4% (range 40% to 73%) for metastatic tumors (p<0.001). Conclusion: Reconstruction with cemented modular endoprostheses is an appropriate surgical alternative in the treatment of large segmental defects after resection of extremity tumors, with satisfactory functional results particularly in primary tumors.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada çimentolu modüler tümör rezeksiyon protezi ile tedavi edilen ekstremite kemik tümörlü olguların fonksiyonel sonuçları değerlendirildi. Çalışma planı: Kemik tümörlerine yönelik geniş rezeksiyon ve çimentolu tümör endoprotezi ile rekonstrüksiyon uygulanan 23 hasta (12 erkek, 11 kadın; ort. yaş 49; dağılım 14-81) incelendi. On iki hastada (%52.2; ort. yaş 63.5) metastatik, 11’inde (%47.8; ort. yaş 38) primer tümör vardı. Tümörler en sık femurda (n=17) görüldü; beş olguda humerus tutulumu vardı. Tüm olgularda çimentolu TMTS (Turkish Musculoskeletal Tumor Society) tümör rezeksiyon protezleri kullanıldı. Fonksiyonel sonuçlar MSTS (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society) skorlama sistemi ile değerlendirildi. Ortalama takip süresi 24 ay (dağılım 1-108 ay) olarak belirlendi (primer tümörlü grupta 30 ay; metastatik tümörlü grupta 3 ay). Sonuçlar: Yedi hastada (%30.4) ameliyat sonrası dönemde komplikasyon gelişti. Bunların üçü lokal nüks idi. Takip dönemi içinde 11 hasta tümöre bağlı nedenlerle kaybedildi; üç hastada uzak metastaz gelişti; dokuz hastada ise tümör bulgusuna rastlanmadı. Sağkalım primer tümörlü grupta anlamlı derecede fazlaydı (p<0.001). Tüm olgular ameliyat sonrası dönemde desteksiz yürüyebiliyordu. Yaşayan olgularda ortalama MSTS skoru %58.9 (dağılım %40-%90) bulundu. Primer tümörlü grubun MSTS skorları (ort. %71.5, dağılım %60-%90) metastatik tümörlü gruba (ort. %47.4, dağılım %40-%73) göre anlamlı derecede yüksekti (p<0.001). Çıkarımlar: Tümör rezeksiyonu sonrası kemikte geniş segmenter defekt oluşan durumlarda, çimentolu modüler endoprotezin uygun bir tedavi seçeneği olduğunu ve fonksiyonel sonuçlarının özellikle primer tümörlerde tatmin edici olduğunu düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALNIZ, E., ÇİFTDEMİR, M., MEMİŞOĞLU, S. (2008). Functional results of patients treated with modular prosthetic replacement for bone tumors of the extremities. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 238–245. https://ajindex.com/articles/353855

References (13)

  1. Eilber F, Giuliano A, Eckardt J, Patterson K, Moseley S, Goodnight J. Adjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma: a randomized prospective trial. J Clin Oncol 1987;5:21-6
  2. Ferguson WS, Goorin AM. Current treatment of osteosarcoma. Cancer Invest 2001;19:292-315
  3. Eckardt JJ, Eilber FR, Dorey FJ, Mirra JM. The UCLA experience in limb salvage surgery for malignant tumors. Orthopedics 1985;8:612-21
  4. Glasser DB, Lane JM, Huvos AG, Marcove RC, Rosen G. Survival, prognosis, and therapeutic response in osteogenic sarcoma. The Memorial Hospital experience. Cancer 1992;69:698-708
  5. Gebhardt MC, Goorin A, Traina J. Long-term results of limb salvage and amputation in extremity osteosarcoma. In: Yamamuro T, editor. New developments for limb salvage in musculoskeletal tumors. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1989. p. 99-109
  6. Simon MA. Limb-salvage for osteosarcoma. In: Yamamuro T, editor. New developments for limb salvage in musculoskeletal tumors. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1989. p.p. 71-2
  7. Ivins J, Taylor W, Golenzer H. A Multi-institutional cooperative study of osteosarcoma. In: Yamamuro T, editor. New developments for limb salvage in musculoskeletal tumors. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1989. p. 61-9
  8. Tomita K, Aotake Y, Sugihara M, Tsuchiya H. Overall results and functional evaluation of limb salvage for osteosarcoma. In: Yamamuro T, editor. New developments for limb salvage in musculoskeletal tumors. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1989. p. 53-7
  9. Safran MR, Kody MH, Namba RS, Larson KR, Kabo JM, Dorey FJ, et al. 151 endoprosthetic reconstructions for patients with primary tumors involving bone. Contemp Orthop 1994;29:15-25
  10. Rougraff BT, Simon MA, Kneisl JS, Greenberg DB, Mankin HJ. Limb salvage compared with amputation for osteosarcoma of the distal end of the femur. A long-term oncological, functional, and quality-of-life study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994;76:649-56
  11. Horowitz SM, Glasser DB, Lane JM, Healey JH. Prosthetic and extremity survivorship after limb salvage for sarcoma. How long do the reconstructions last? Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;(293):280-6
  12. Roberts P, Chan D, Grimer RJ, Sneath RS, Scales JT. Prosthetic replacement of the distal femur for primary bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1991;73:762-9
  13. Henshaw R, Malaver MM. Review of endoprosthetic reconstruction in limb-sparing surgery. In: Malawer MM, Sugarbaker PH, editors. Musculoskeletal cancer surgery: treatment of sarcomas and allied disease. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub