Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2010 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5

Epidemiology of injuries treated at a hand and microsurgery hospital

El ve mikrocerrahi hastanesinde tedavi edilen yaralanmaların epidemiyolojisi

Pages
352–360
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The inclusion of medical records from such specialized hospitals into national databases will aid in the prevention of these injuries, and induce developments in diagnosis and treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of injuries treated at a hand and microsurgery hospital between 1992 and 2005.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This is a descriptive retrospective study based on medical records of a hand and microsurgery hospital in ‹zmir for the years 1992-2005.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The inclusion of medical records from such specialized hospitals into national databases will aid in the prevention of these injuries, and induce developments in diagnosis and treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of injuries treated at a hand and microsurgery hospital between 1992 and 2005. Methods: This is a descriptive retrospective study based on medical records of a hand and microsurgery hospital in &#8249;zmir for the years 1992-2005. A total of 8,946 injuries involving 8,817 patients were included. Data on diagnosis were recorded according to ICD-10. Intent, activity when injured, mechanism of injury, object/substance producing injury, and place of injury were recoded according to International Classification of External Causes of Injury (ICECI). Results: The most common types of injury were amputations (32.3%), fractures (23.7%), and open wounds (19.9%) of the wrist and hand. Most injuries were sustained by males; 28.4% of injuries occurred during summer. According to activity, 76.3% were injured during paid work, 10.4% during transportation, 9.1% during unpaid work, and 3.8% during leisure time sports and exercise. Injuries most commonly occurred while operating a machine. The risk of hand injury was elevated in those younger than 35 years of age, males, persons outside &#8249;zmir province, and in Social Security Instution (SSI) insured workers (p<0.001). The riskiest activity for hand injuries was paid work. Compared to baseline, the risk of hand injuries was 29 times [95% confidence interval (CI) 16.36-50.40] as high in industrial or construction areas, and 50 times (95% CI 17.29-143.96) as high in commercial places. Conclusion: Hand injuries are important because of their consequences, such as permanent disability and their high treatment costs. This study points out many important risk factors, and has contributed the development of hypotheses about injury types, under-notification of occupational injuries, and child labour. The inclusion of medical records from such specialized hospitals into national databases will aid in the prevention of these injuries, and induce developments in diagnosis and treatment.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı 1992-2005 yılları arasında bir el ve mikrocerrahi hastanesinde tedavi edilen yaralanmaların epidemiyolojik olarak değerlendirilmesidir. Çalışma planı: Tanımlayıcı tipte olan bu araştırmada retrospektif olarak izmir’de bir el ve mikrocerrahi hastanesinin 1992-2005 yıllarına ait kayıtları kullanılmıştır. Toplam 8,817 hastaya ait 8,946 yaralanma değerlendirilmiştir. Tanı verileri ICD-10’a göre yeniden kodlanmıştır. Tanılar kasıt, aktivite, yaralanma mekanizması, yaralanmaya neden eden olan/eşlik eden araç, kaza yeri gibi değişkenler Yaralanmalara Yol Açan Dış Nedenlerin Uluslararası Sınışaması (ICECI) ile sı- nışandırılmıştır. Sonuçlar: En sık görülen yaralanmalar el ve el bileği amputasyonları (32.3%), kırıkları (23.7%) ve açık yaralarıdır (19.9%). En çok erkekler yaralanmıştır; yaralanmaların %28’4’ü yaz aylarında gerçekleşmiştir. Aktiviteye göre yaralanmaların %76.3’ü iş, %10.4’ü ulaşım (trafik), %9.1’i karşı lığı ödenmeyen iş (ev) ve %3.8’i boş zamanlarda yapılan spor ve egzersiz sırasında gerçekleşmiştir. En sık bir makineyle çalışırken (%44.8) yaralanma meydana gelmiştir. Otuzbeş yaş altındakilerde, erkeklerde, izmir dışında oturanlarda ve SSK’lılarda el yaralanması görülme sıklığı di- ğerlerine göre daha yüksektir (p<0.001). El yaralanmaları açısından en riskli aktivitenin iş olduğu saptanmıştır. El yaralanması görülme sıklığı, endüstri ya da inşaat alanlarında 29 kat [%95 güven aralığı (GA) 16.36-50.40)] ticaretle ilgili yerlerde 50 kat (%95 GA 17.29-143.96) fazladır. Çıkarımlar: El yaralanmaları kalıcı sakatlığa yol açmaları ve tedavi maliyetlerinin yüksekliği nedeniyle önemlidir. Bu araştırma el yaralanmaları için birçok önemli risk faktörüne işaret etmiş, kaza tipleri, bildirilmeyen iş kazaları, çocuk işçiliği gibi konularda yapılacak araştırmalar için hipotezler oluşturulmasına katkıda bulunmuştur. Bu tür özelleşmiş hastanelere ait kayıtların ulusal kayıtlara dahil edilmesi, bu yaralanmaların önlenmesi çalışmalarına katkıda bulunacağı gibi, tanı ve tedavi açısından da gelişmelere yol açacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAVAS, A. A., ONMUŞ, İ. R. D., ADA, S., KAYALAR, M., AKSU, F., BAL, E. (2010). Epidemiology of injuries treated at a hand and microsurgery hospital. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5, 352–360. https://ajindex.com/articles/353818

References (14)

  1. WHO. Preventing injuries and violence. A guide for ministries of health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. p. 6-9
  2. WHO. The injury chart book: a graphical overview of the global burden of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. p.1
  3. National burden of disease and costeffectiveness study. Final report on burden of disease. [Book in Turkish] Ankara: RSHMB; 2004
  4. Trybus M, Lorkowski J, Brongel L, Hladki W. Causes and consequences of hand injuries. Am J Surg 2006;192:52-7 5. www.rivm.nl/who-fic/ICECI/ICECI_1-2_2004July.pdf. Accessed at 28.09.09
  5. Larsen CF, Mulder S, Johansen AM, Stam C. The epidemiology of hand injuries in the Netherlands and Denmark. Eur J Epidemiol 2004;19:323-7
  6. Angermann P, Lohmann M. Injuries to the hand and wrist. A study of 50,272 injuries. J Hand Surg Br 1993;18:642-4
  7. Serinken M, Karcıoğlu O, fiener S. Occupational hand injuries treated at a tertiary care facility in western Turkey. Ind Health 2008;46:239-46
  8. Mo F, Choi BCK, Clottey C, Le Brun B, Robbins G. Characteristics and risk factors for accident injury in Canada from 1986 to 1996: an analysis of the Canadian Accident Injury Reporting and Evaluation (CAIRE) database. Inj Control Saf Promot 2002;9:73-81
  9. Kalenderer Ö, Gürcü T, Reisoğlu A, Ağuş H. The frequency and distribution of fractures in children presenting to the emergency service. [Article in Turkish] Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2006;40:384-7
  10. Nazlıcan E, Demirhindi H, Karaömerlioğlu Ö, Akbaba M, Gökel Y. The evaluation of home injuries among presentations to the adult emergency ward of Çukurova University Hospital. [Article in Turkish] TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni 2008;7:2
  11. Sorock GS, Lombardi DA, Hauser R, Eisen EA, Herrick RF, Mittleman MA. A case-crossover study of transient risk factors for occupational acute hand injury. Occup Environ Med 2004;61:305-11
  12. Kaisha WO, Khainga S. Causes and pattern of unilateral hand injuries. East Afr Med J 2008;85:123-8. 14. al Zahrani S, Ikram MA, al-Qattan MM. Predisposing factors to industrial hand injuries in Saudi Arabia. J Hand Surg Br 1997;22:131-2
  13. Chau N, Wild P, Dehaene D, Benamghar L, Mur JM, Touron C. Roles of age, length of service and job in workrelated injury: a prospective study of 446 120 person-years in railway workers. Occup Environ Med 2010;67:147-53
  14. Chau N, Gauchard GC, Siegfried C, Benamghar L, Dangelzer JL, Français M, et al. Relationships of job, age, and life conditions with the causes and severi