Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2011 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6

An effective treatment for hip instabilities: Pelvic support osteotomy and femoral lengthening

Kalça instabilitelerinde etkin bir tedavi alternatifi: Pelvik destek osteotomisi ve femoral uzatma

Pages
437–445
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Pelvic support osteotomy is a good treatment option to overcome hip instability as it improves pain and equalizes limb length

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of pelvic support osteotomy treatment in hip instabilities due to various etiologies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 21 hips of 20 patients that underwent pelvic support osteotomy between 2005 and 2007.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Pelvic support osteotomy is a good treatment option to overcome hip instability as it improves pain and equalizes limb length
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of pelvic support osteotomy treatment in hip instabilities due to various etiologies. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 21 hips of 20 patients that underwent pelvic support osteotomy between 2005 and 2007. Hip instability was caused by a neglected congenital dislocation of the hip in 12 of the patients (13 hips), by septic arthritis in 7 and by an unsuccessful total hip arthroplasty due to infection in the last patient. The mean age of the patients was 22.6 (range: 12 to 34) years. Osteotomy sites were fixed using monolateral external fixators in 11 patients, Ilizarov circular fixators in 8, and locking plates for both hips of the remaining patient. The mean follow-up period was 33.45 (range: 16 to 45) months. Results: The mean Harris score increased from 48.3 preoperatively to 80.1 postoperatively. Preoperative mean limb length discrepancy was 53.3 mm and mean proximal migration was 42.9 mm. Residual limb length discrepancy was reduced to 16 mm after an average lengthening of 63.3. The preoperative Trendelenburg gait disappeared completely in 13 of 21 hips and was improved in 8 hips. Sixteen of the 20 patients (17 hips) expressed satisfaction with the operation. Conclusion: Pelvic support osteotomy is a good treatment option to overcome hip instability as it improves pain and equalizes limb length

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda pelvik destek osteotomisinin farklı etiyolojik nedenlerle ortaya çıkan kalça instabilitelerinin tedavisindeki etkinliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Çalışma planı: 2005-2007 tarihleri arasında, pelvik destek osteotomisi uygulanan 20 hastanın 21 kalçası retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastalardan 12 tanesinde (13 kalça) gelişimsel kalça çıkığına, 7 tanesinde septik artrite ve I tanesinde de enfekte kalça protezi sonrası implantın uzaklaştırılmasına bağlı instabiliteye rastlandı. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 22.6 (dağılım: 12-34) yıl. ortalama takip süresi ise 33.45 (dağılım: 16-45) ay olarak hesaplandı. Osteotomilerin tespiti için 11 hastada monola-teral fıksatör, 8 hastada sirküler fiksatör ve bilateral çıkığı olan hastada da kilitli plaklar kullanıldı. Bulgular: Pelvik destek osteotomisi öncesi ortalama 48.3 olan Harris skoru ameliyatlar sonrası 80.1'e yükseldi. Ameliyat öncesinde ortalama kısalık 53.3 mm ve ortalama proksimal migrasyon 42.9 mm iken, ortalama 63.3 mm'lik uzatma sonrasında kalan kısalık ortalama olarak 16 mm olarak hesaplandı. Yirmibir kalçadan 13 tanesinde Trendelenburg yürüyüşünün tamamen. 8 tanesinde ise kısmen düzeldiği görüldü. Ameliyat sonrasında hastalara geçirdikleri ameliyattan memnun olup olmadıkları sorulduğunda 20 hastadan 16 tanesinin (17 kalça) memnun olduğu görüldü. Çıkarımlar: Sonuçlarımız pelvik destek osteotomisinin kalça instabilitelerinin giderilmesinde, ağrının ve eğer varsa boy eşitsizliğinin ortadan kaldırılmasında etkin bir tedavi yöntemi olduğunu düşündürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRSU, Ş. S., DEMİR, B., YILDIRIM, T., ER, T., BURSALI, A., ŞAHİN, V. (2011). An effective treatment for hip instabilities: Pelvic support osteotomy and femoral lengthening. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6, 437–445. https://ajindex.com/articles/353746

References (17)

  1. Garvin KL, Bowen MK, Salvati EA, Ranawat CS. Longterm results of total hip arthroplasty in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. A follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:1348-54
  2. Hartofilakidis K, Stamos K, Karachalios T. Treatment of high dislocation of the hip in adults with total hip arthroplasty. Operative technique and long-term clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:510-7
  3. Moyad TF, Thornhill T, Estok D. Evaluation and management of the infected total hip and knee. Orthopedics 2008; 31:581-8
  4. Beaulé PE, Matta JM, Mast JW. Hip arthrodesis: current indications and techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2002; 10:249-58
  5. Gaenslen FJ. The Schanz subtrochanteric osteotomy for irreducible dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1935;17:76-87
  6. Manzotti A, Rovetta L, Pullen C, Catagni MA. Treatment of late sequelae of septic arthiritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;(410):203-12
  7. Aksoy MC, Musdal Y. Subtrochanteric valgus-extension osteotomy for neglected congenital dislocation of the hip in young adults. Acta Orthop Belg 2000;66:2:181-6
  8. Pafilas D, Nayagam S. The pelvic support osteotomy: indications and preoperative planning. Strat Traum Limb Recon 2008;3:83-92
  9. Schanz A. Zur Behandlung der veralteten angeborenen Hüftverrenkung. Munch Med Wschr 1922;99:930
  10. Hass J. A Subtrochanteric osteotomy for pelvic support. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1943;25:281-91
  11. Milch H. The pelvic support osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;(249):4-11
  12. Ilizarov GA. Transosseous osteosynthesis. Berlin: Springer; 1992
  13. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969;51:737-55
  14. Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;(250):81-104
  15. Eskelinen A, Helenius I, Remes V, Ylinen P, Tallroth K, Paavilainen T. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with high congenital hip dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:80-91
  16. Davlin LB, Amstutz HC, Tooke SM, Dorey FJ, Nasser S. Treatment of osteoarthiritis secondary to congenital dislocation of the hip. Primary cemented surface replacement compared with conventional total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:1035-42
  17. Wangen H, Lereim P, Holm I, Gunderson R, Reikerås O. Hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 3