SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2011 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6

Long-term functional results after radial nerve repair

Radial sinir onarımının uzun dönem fonksiyonel sonuçları

Yusuf GÜRBÜZ
Murat KAYALAR
Emin BAL
S. ahir SÜĞÜN
Kemal ÖZAKSAR
Yalçın ADEMOĞLU
Pages
387–392
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pinch and grip power measurement comparison of the two sides in the 16 patients with excellent results showed a respective 24.1% and 14.3% decrease on the affected side.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the functional results of end-to-end repairs in radial nerve injuries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 18 (15 males, 3 females) patients who underwent middle level end-to-end radial nerve repair and who responded to our final follow-up call.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pinch and grip power measurement comparison of the two sides in the 16 patients with excellent results showed a respective 24.1% and 14.3% decrease on the affected side.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the functional results of end-to-end repairs in radial nerve injuries. Methods: The study included 18 (15 males, 3 females) patients who underwent middle level end-to-end radial nerve repair and who responded to our final follow-up call. Patients’ average age was 30 (range: 16 to 43) years. The average time lapse between injury and repair was 25.1 days (range: 1 day to 13 months). Pinch and grip strength measurements were graded according to the modified Verga classification. The Highet classification was used for the evaluation of sensorial recovery. Functional outcome were assessed with the DASH-T score. Average follow-up time was 62.5 (range: 24 to 156) months. Results: Motor function according to the Verga classification was excellent in 16 patients and poor in two. Pinch and grip power measurement comparison of the two sides in the 16 patients with excellent results showed a respective 24.1% and 14.3% decrease on the affected side. According to Highet’s classification, sensorial evaluation was S4 in seven patients, S3+ in four, S3 in three, S2+ in one, S2 in one, and S1 in two patients. The average DASH-T score of patients with excellent results was 7.3. Conclusion: Radial nerve repairs, if done end-to-end using an appropriate technique, may lead to nearly full recovery in younger patients.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda radial sinir yaralanmalarında yapılan uç uca sinir onarımlarının fonksiyonel sonuçlarını değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Çalışma planı: Bu çalışmada, orta seviyedeki radial sinir yaralanmalarında uç uca radial sinir onarımı yapılan ve son kontrol çağrımıza cevap veren 18 hasta (15 erkek, 3 kadın) değerlendirildi. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 30 (dağılım: 16-43) olarak saptandı. Yaralanma ile cerrahi girişim arasında geçen süre, hastalarımızda ortalama 25.1 gün (dağılım: I gün - 13 ay) olarak hesaplandı. Kavrama ve çimdikleme güçleri modifıye Verga sınıflandırmasına göre, duysal değerlendirme verileri Highet sınıflandırmasına göre değerlendirildi. Fonksiyonel sonuçlar DASH-Türkçe ile değerlendirildi. Ortalama izlem süresi 62.5 (dağılım: 24-156) ay idi. Bulgular: Motor değerlendirme sonuçları, modit'iye Verga sınıflandırmasına göre; 18 hastanın 16'sında mükemmel. 2'siııde yetersiz bulundu. Mükemmel (n=16) iyileşen hastalarda, kavrama ve çimdikleme güçleri etkilenen taraf ile etkilenmeyen taraf arasında karşılaştırıldığında; kavrama gücünde %14.3, çimdikleme gücünde %24.1 azalma olduğu saptandı. Duysal geri dönüş değerlendirilmesinde, Highet sınıflandırması kullanılarak 7 hastada S4, 4 hastada S3+, 3 hastada S3. I hastada S2+. 1 hastada S2, 2 hastada da Sİ sonuçlan elde edildi. DASH-T skor ortalaması. iyileşmeleri mükemmel olarak sonuçlanan hastalarda 7.3 olarak hesaplandı. Çıkarımlar: Radial sinir onarımı uygun teknikle uç uca yapıldığında, genç hasta grubunda tama yakın iyileşme sağlayabilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRBÜZ, Y., KAYALAR, M., BAL, E., SÜĞÜN, S. A., ÖZAKSAR, K., ADEMOĞLU, Y. (2011). Long-term functional results after radial nerve repair. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6, 387–392. https://ajindex.com/articles/353742

References (16)

  1. Lee YH, Chung MS, Gong HS, Chung JY, Park JH, Baek GH. Sural nerve autografts for high radial nerve injury with nine centimeter or greater defects. J Hand Surg Am 2008;33:83-6
  2. Kallio PK, Vastamäki M, Solonen KA. The results of secondary microsurgical repair of radial nerve in 33 patients. J Hand Surg Br 1993;18:320-2
  3. Lowe JB 3rd, Sen SK, Mackinnon SE. Current approach to radial nerve paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110: 1099-113
  4. Shergill G, Bonney G, Munshi P, Birch R. The radial and posterior interosseous nerves. Results of 260 repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:646-9
  5. Shao YC, Harwood P, Grotz MR, Limb D, Giannoudis PV. Radial nerve palsy associated with fractures of the shaft of the humerus: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:1647-52 6. Thomsen NO, Dahlin LB. Injury to the radial nerve caused by fracture of the humeral shaft: timing and neurobiological aspects related to treatment and diagnosis. Scan J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2007;41:153-7
  6. Noaman H, Khalifa AR, El-Deen MA, Shiha A. Early surgical exploration of radial nerve injury associated with fracture shaft humerus. Microsurgery 2008;28:635-42
  7. Foster RJ, Swiontkowski MF, Bach AW, Sack JT. Radial nerve palsy caused by open humeral shaft fractures. J Hand Surg Am 1993;18:121-4
  8. Packer JW, Foster RR, Garcia A, Grantham SA. The humeral fracture with radial nerve palsy: is exploration warranted? Clin Orthop 1972;(88):34-8
  9. Omer GE Jr. Acute management of peripheral nerve injuries. Hand Clin 1986;2:193-206
  10. Yakkanti MR, Roberts CS, Acland RD. Anterior transposition of the radial nerve – a cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22:705-8
  11. Brunelli G, Monini L, Brunelli F. Problems in nerve lesions. Microsurgery 1985;6:187-98
  12. Altintas AA, Altintas MA, Gazyakan E, Gohla T, Germann G, Sauerbier M. Long-term results and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score analysis after modified Brooks and d’Aubigne tendon transfer for radial nerve palsy. J Hand Surg Am 2009;34:474-8
  13. Al-Qattan MM. Tendon transfer to reconstruct wrist extension in children with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Br 2003;28:153-7
  14. Brunelli GA, Brunelli GR. Preoperative assessment of the adult plexus patient. Microsurgery 1995;16:17-21
  15. McPeak LA. Physiatric history and examination. In: Braddom RL, editor. Physical medicine and rehabilitation. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders; 1996. p. 3-42
  16. Vastamäki M, Kallio PK, Solonen KA. The resul