Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2014 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 6

Influence of number and orientation of screws on stability in the internal fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures

Pages
673–678
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The use of a transverse screw in the calcar in addition to cannulated screws parallel to the neck appear to provide stability benefit in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare 3 different cannulated screw configurations used in internal fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 28 synthetic left femurs randomly divided into 4 equal groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The use of a transverse screw in the calcar in addition to cannulated screws parallel to the neck appear to provide stability benefit in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare 3 different cannulated screw configurations used in internal fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures. Methods: The study included 28 synthetic left femurs randomly divided into 4 equal groups. Samples in the first 3 groups were osteotomized in the basicervical region to create Pauwels Type 3 fractures. Fixation was carried out using cannulated screws. In Group 1, four screws were used including 3 in an inverted triangle configuration in parallel with the neck and the fourth screw transversely into the calcar. In Group 2, three screws were used including 2 in parallel with the neck and the third transversely into the calcar. In Group 3, three screws were used in an inverted triangle configuration in parallel with the neck. No osteotomy or fixation was carried out in Group 4. Load test was performed on all the groups and the strength of the screw fixations against axial load and their amount of relocation were measured. Results: Average maximum strength was 36.1±3.2 N/mm2 in Group 1, 27.3±4.1 N/mm2 in Group 2 and 21.9±3.2 N/mm2 in Group 3. The average relocation in the line of osteotomy in the moment of average maximum stress (21.9±3.2 N/mm2 ) was 11.5±2.1 mm in Group 3, 6±1.3 mm in Group 2 and 5.8±1.1 mm in Group 1 (p<0.05). It was also observed that while the relocation in the moment of average maximum stress (27.3±4.1 N/mm2 ) was 9.1±1.7 mm in Group 2, the deformation under the same stress value was 9±1.7 mm in Group 1 (p>0.05). Conclusion: The use of a transverse screw in the calcar in addition to cannulated screws parallel to the neck appear to provide stability benefit in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜMÜŞTAŞ, S. A., TOSUN, H. B., AĞIR, İ., ORAK, M. M., ONAY, T., OKCU, G. (2014). Influence of number and orientation of screws on stability in the internal fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 6, 673–678. https://ajindex.com/articles/353619

References (15)

  1. Christodoulou NA, Dretakis EK. Significance of muscular disturbances in the localization of fractures of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;187:215-7
  2. Parker MJ. The management of intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82:937-41
  3. Frihagen F, Nordsletten L, Madsen JE. Hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation for intracapsular displaced femoral neck fractures: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007;335:1251-4
  4. Ly TV, Swiontkowski MF. Management of femoral neck fractures in young adults. Indian J Orthop. 2008;42:3-12
  5. Zdero R, Keast-Butler O, Schemitsch EH. A biomechanical comparison of two triple-screw methods for femoral neck fracture fixation in a synthetic bone model. J Trauma 2010;69:1537-44
  6. Tan V, Wong KL, Born CT, Harten R, DeLong WG Jr. Two-screw femoral neck fracture fixation: a biomechanical analysis of 2 different configurations. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2007;36:481-5
  7. Satish BR, Ranganadham AV, Ramalingam K, Tripathy SK. Four quadrant parallel peripheral screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Indian J Orthop 2013;47:174-81
  8. Gurusamy K, Parker MJ, Rowlands TK. The complications of displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip: the effect of screw positioning and angulation on fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:632-4
  9. Yang JJ, Lin LC, Chao KH, Chuang SY, Wu CC, Yeh TT, et al. Risk factors for nonunion in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with three cannulated screws placed in either a triangle or an inverted triangle configuration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:61-9
  10. Bartonícek J. Pauwels’ classification of femoral neck fractures: correct interpretation of the original. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:358-60
  11. Scolaro JA, Mehta S, Chip Routt ML. Femoral neck fractures in the physiologically young. University of Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Journal 2010;20:5-10
  12. Filipov O. Biplane double-supported screw fixation (Ftechnique): a method of screw fixation at osteoporotic fractures of the femoral neck. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2011;21:539-43
  13. LePine MS, Barfield WR, DesJardins JD, Hartsock LA. The effect of moment arm length on high angled femoral neck fractures (Pauwels’ III). J Biomed Sci Eng 2010;3:448-53
  14. Clark DI, Crofts CE, Saleh M. Femoral neck fracture fixation. Comparison of a sliding screw with lag screws. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:797-800
  15. Alves T, Neal JW, Weinhold PS, Dahners LE. Biome