Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2014 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

Tek seansta iki taraflı ile tek taraflı total diz artroplastisinin karşılaştırılması

Comparison of simultaneous bilateral with unilateral total knee arthroplasty

Pages
127–135
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Simultaneous BTKA should be considered in selected patients under 70 years of age with good compliance and no comorbid disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) and unilateral total knee arthroplasty (UTKA) in terms of morbidity, clinical and radiological findings and quality of life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study included 48 simultaneous BTKAs (46 females, 2 males; mean age: 64.00±8.31 years) and 53 UTKAs (46 females, 7 males; mean age: 64.40±7.45 years) performed between November 2007 and June 2012.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Simultaneous BTKA should be considered in selected patients under 70 years of age with good compliance and no comorbid disease.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) and unilateral total knee arthroplasty (UTKA) in terms of morbidity, clinical and radiological findings and quality of life. Methods: The study included 48 simultaneous BTKAs (46 females, 2 males; mean age: 64.00±8.31 years) and 53 UTKAs (46 females, 7 males; mean age: 64.40±7.45 years) performed between November 2007 and June 2012. Groups were compared with respect to comorbidity, complications, blood transfusion, hospital stay, clinical and radiological (American Knee Society Score) findings and quality of life (SF-36). Results: Three patients in the BTKA group and 1 in the UTKA group required intensive care admission due to pulmonary embolism; 2 cases occurred within the first postoperative 30 days. One BTKA patient died in the early postoperative period and 1 patient from the BTKA and 1 from the UTKA group died within 1 year. Hospital stay, perioperative blood transfusion parameters and mortality rates were significantly different in favor of UTKA and revision operation rates in favor of BTKA (p<0.05). All patients had improved knee and function scores and SF-36 scores. However, there was no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Simultaneous BTKA should be considered in selected patients under 70 years of age with good compliance and no comorbid disease.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada tek seansta iki taraflı total diz artroplastisi (İTDA) ve tek taraflı total diz artroplastisinin (TTDA) morbidite, klinik ve radyolojik bulgular ile hayat kalitesi yönünden karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Çalışma planı: Kasım 2007 - Haziran 2012 tarihleri arasında tek seansta gerçekleştirilen 48 İTDA (46 kadın, 2 erkek; ortalama yaş: 64.00±8.31) ile 53 TTDA (45 kadın, 8 erkek; ortalama yaş: 64.40±7.45) hastası çalışmaya dahil edildi. Gruplar, komorbidite, komplikasyon, kan transfüzyonu, hastanede kalış süreleri, klinik ve radyolojik (AKSS) bulgular ve hayat kalitesi (SF-36) yönünden değerlendirildi. Bulgular: İkisi cerrahi sonrası ilk 30 gün içinde olmak üzere, İTDA grubundan 3 hastada, TTDA grubundan 1 hastada pulmoner emboli gelişmesi nedeniyle hastaların yoğun bakım servisinde takibi yapıldı. İTDA grubundan 1 hasta erken dönemde; yine İTDA grubundan 1 hasta ile TTDA grubundan 1 hasta da bir yıl içinde yaşamlarını yitirdi. Hastaların hastanede kaldığı süreler, cerrahi sırasındaki kan transfüzyon miktarları ve mortalite bulguları TTDA lehine, revizyon bulguları İTDA lehine istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p 0.05). Çıkarımlar: Yetmiş yaş altında, ek hastalığı olmayan, uyumlu hasta seçimi ile tek seansta İTDA’nın uygulanması bir seçenek olarak düşünülebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKİNCİ, Y., ÖNER, M., KARAMAN, İ., KAFADAR, İ. H., MUTLU, M., ARGÜN, M. (2014). Tek seansta iki taraflı ile tek taraflı total diz artroplastisinin karşılaştırılması. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 127–135. https://ajindex.com/articles/353602

References (16)

  1. Thadani PJ, Spitzer AI. Primary total knee arthroplasty: Indications and long-term results. Curr Opin Orthop 2000
  2. CrossRef 2. Aydogdu S, Sur H. Total knee prostheses. In: Ege R, edi- tor. Knee problems. Ankara: Bizim Büro Basımevi
  3. p. 391-403. 3. Macario A, Schilling P, Rubio R, Goodman S. Economics of one-stage versus two-stage bilateral total knee arthro- plasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003
  4. CrossRef 4. March LM, Cross M, Tribe KL, Lapsley HM, Courtenay BG, Cross MJ, et al. Two knees or not two knees? Patient costs and outcomes following bilateral and unilateral to- tal knee joint replacement surgery for OA. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004
  5. CrossRef 5. Noble J, Goodall JR, Noble DJ. Simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement: a persistent controversy. Knee 2009
  6. CrossRef 6. Bullock DP, Sporer SM, Shirreffs TG Jr. Comparison of simultaneous bilateral with unilateral total knee arthro- plasty in terms of perioperative complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003
  7. A:1981-6. 7. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989
  8. Insall JN, Easley ME. Surgical techniques and instrumen- tation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, Scott WN, editors. Insall & Scott Surgery of the knee. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone
  9. p. 1553-620. 9. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000
  10. CrossRef 10. Goldberg VM, Kraay M. The outcome of the cementless tibial component: a minimum 14-year clinical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004
  11. CrossRef 11. Bassett RW. Results of 1,000 Performance knees: cement- less versus cemented fixation. J Arthroplasty 1998
  12. CrossRef 12. Gill GS, Joshi AB. Long-term results of Kinematic Con- dylar knee replacement. An analysis of 404 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001
  13. CrossRef 13. Akgün I, Oğüt T, Kesmezacar H, Yücel I. Total knee ar- throplasty: a 4.5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2002
  14. Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Mi- licic M, Myers L. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthro- plasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001
  15. A:1376-81. 15. Heal J, Blewitt N. Kinemax total knee arthroplasty: trial by template. J Arthroplasty 2002
  16. CrossRef 16. Waters TS, Bentley G. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospectiv