Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 5

Prevalence of flatfoot among school students and its relationship with BMI

Pages
554–557
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This is anopen access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the relation between theflat-footedness and obesity.Materials and Methods: A total of 1158 school children (653 male and 505 female) participated in thiscross sectional descriptive study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to their age, children were divided into three groups for eachgender (6e10, 11e13, 14e18 years old).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is anopen access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the relation between theflat-footedness and obesity.Materials and Methods: A total of 1158 school children (653 male and 505 female) participated in thiscross sectional descriptive study. According to their age, children were divided into three groups for eachgender (6e10, 11e13, 14e18 years old). Diagnosis and severity of flatfoot was assessed in using theDennis method. BMI of children were calculated as body weight divided by height squared (kg*m 2).Results: Majority (83.9%) of respondents had normal feet. The prevalence offlatfoot was 16.1% with adecreasing trend with age. Boys had a higher frequency offlatfoot than girls; however the difference wasnot signiŞcant (p > 0.05). The prevalence of flatfoot was 17.5% in boys and 14.5% in girls. The percentageof overweight and obese children was 10.3%. A signiŞcant difference in the prevalence of flatfoot occurredbetween; under-weight (13.9%), normal-weight (16.1%), overweight (26.9%), and obese (30.8%); children.Conclusion: The increasing prevalence of childhood obesity is one of the most serious health challengesacross the globe, and a positive correlation between increased BMI; andflatfoot is one of the potentialcomplications.© 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is anopen access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

🔖

Cite This Article

POURGHASEM, M., KAMALİ, N., FARSİ, M., SOLTANPOUR, N. (2016). Prevalence of flatfoot among school students and its relationship with BMI. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 5, 554–557. https://ajindex.com/articles/353557

References (2)

  1. Franco AH. Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment. Phys Ther.;67(5):688e694. Kim MK, Lee YS. Kinematic analysis of the lower extremities of subjects with flat feet at different gait speeds. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(5):531e533. Ker RF, Bennett MB, Bibby SR, Kester RC, Alexander RM. The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature. 1987;325(7000):147e149. Walczak M, Napiontek M. Flexibleflatfoot in children, a controversial subject. Ortop Pol. 2003;68(4):261e267. Meehan P. Other conditions of the foot. In: Morrissy RT, ed. Lovell and Winter's Pediatric Orthopaedics. 3rd ed. philadelphia: Lippincott; 1990:991e1022. Smith MA. Flat feet in children. BMJ. 1990;301:942e943. Dowling AM, Steel JR, Baur LA. Does obesity influence foot structure and plantar pressure patterns in prepubescent children? Int J Obese. 2001;25: e852. Daneshmandi H, Rahnema N, Mehdizadeh R. Relationship between obesity and flatfoot in high school boys and children. Int J Sports Sci Eng. 2003;3:43e49. Atamturk D. Relationship offlatfoot and high arch with main anthropometric variables. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009;43(3):254e259. Zhang L, Kolbo JR, Kirkub M, et al. Prevalence and trends in overweight and obesity among mississipi public school students, 2005-2013. J Miss Med Assoc. Mar;55(3):80e87. Gracia A, Jimenez FM, Varo MC, Gracia EG, Aracenta JG, Crehue GF. Flexibleflat foot in children: a real problem? Pediatrics. 1999;7:84e89. Bordin D, De Giorgi G, Mazzocco G, Rigon F. Flat and caves foot, indexes of obesity and overweight in a population of primarye school children, in uni- versity of Podua, Italy. Minerva Pediatr. 2001 Feb;53(1):7e13. Chang JH, Wang SH, Kuo CL, Shen HC, Hong YW, Lin LC. Prevalence offlexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age. Eur J Pediatr. 2010 Apr;169(4):447e452. Denis A. Pied Plat Valgus Statique. Encyclopedie Medico-chirurgicale Appareil Locomoteur. Paris, France: Editions Techniques; 1974.
  2. Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, Hauser G, Sluga M. Prevalence offlat foot in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics. 2006;118(2):634e639. Cetin A, Sevil S, Karaoglu L, Yucekaya B. Prevalence offlat foot among elementary school students, in rural and urban areas and at suburbs in Ana- tolia. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2011;21(5):327e331. BMI 195 001 Eluwa M, Omini R, Kpela T, Ekanem T, Pantah AA. The incidence of pes planus among Akwa Ibom state students in the university of calabar. Internet J Forensic Sci. 2009;3(2).