SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire for hallux valgus deformity evaluation

BURCU TALU
KEZBAN BAYRAMLAR
NİLGÜN BEK
Yavuz YAKUT
Pages
207–213
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Construct validity was supported by the presence of all the hypothesized correlations, with SF-36 within its physical parameters.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the MOXFQ is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating foot pain and functional status in patients affected by hallux valgus

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients affected by hallux valgus in order to assess the accuracy of this cross-cultural adaption.Methods: Thirty female volunteers aged between 18 and 55 years were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Subjects with hallux valgus were asked to complete the MOXFQ and the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF36).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Construct validity was supported by the presence of all the hypothesized correlations, with SF-36 within its physical parameters.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the MOXFQ is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating foot pain and functional status in patients affected by hallux valgus
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients affected by hallux valgus in order to assess the accuracy of this cross-cultural adaption.Methods: Thirty female volunteers aged between 18 and 55 years were included in the study. Subjects with hallux valgus were asked to complete the MOXFQ and the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF36). After receiving permission from the author, the MOXFQ was translated into Turkish twice and then back translated to English, after which its compatibility was evaluated. The Turkish version of the MOXFO was applied twice, 1-3 days apart, to the study subjects. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Construct validity was assessed with the use of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, using a priori hypothesized correlations with SF-36 domains.Results: Subjects achieved similar scores at the first and second administration of the questionnaire (<0.001). The internal consistency reliability was acceptable for all MOXFQ domains (pain, walking/standing, social interaction), with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.775 to 0.779. The assessment of test-retest reliability revealed satisfactory values, with ICCs ranging from 0.91 to 0.96. Construct validity was supported by the presence of all the hypothesized correlations, with SF-36 within its physical parameters.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the MOXFQ is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating foot pain and functional status in patients affected by hallux valgus

🔖

Cite This Article

TALU, B., BAYRAMLAR, K., BEK, N., YAKUT, Y. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire for hallux valgus deformity evaluation. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 207–213. https://ajindex.com/articles/353551

References (13)

  1. Coughlin MJ, Jones CP. Hallux valgus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int 2007;28:759-77.
  2. Marinozzi A, Martinelli N, Panascì M, Cancilleri F, Fran- ceschetti E, Vincenzi B, et al. Italian translation of the Man- chester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, with re-assessment of reliability and validity. Qual Life Res 2009;18:923-7.
  3. Dawson J, Thorogood M, Marks SA, Juszczak E, Dodd C, Lavis G, et al. The prevalence of foot problems in older women: a cause for concern. J Public Health Med 2002;24:77-84.
  4. Uchiyama E, Kitaoka HB, Luo ZP, Grande JP, Kura H, An KN. Pathomechanics of hallux valgus: biomechani- cal and immunohistochemical study. Foot Ankle Int 2005;26:732-8.
  5. Dawson J, Doll H, Coffey J, Jenkinson C; Oxford and Birmingham Foot and Ankle Clinical Research Group. Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments follow- ing surgery for hallux valgus. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007;15:918-31.
  6. Ferrari J, Higgins JP, Williams RL. Interventions for treat- ing hallux valgus (abductovalgus) and bunions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD000964. Alvey J, Palmer S, Otter S. A comparison of the readability of two patient-reported outcome measures used to evalu- ate foot surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg 2012;51:412-4.
  7. Mann R, Plattner P. Ankle and foot: Editorial overview. Curr Opin Orth 1990;1:111-2.
  8. Agel J, Beskin JL, Brage M, Guyton GP, Kadel NJ, Saltzman CL, et al. Reliability of the Foot Function In- dex:: A report of the AOFAS Outcomes Committee. Foot Ankle Int 2005;26:962-7.
  9. Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 2001;22:788-94.
  10. Rokkedal-Lausch T, Lykke M, Hansen MS, Nielsen RO. Normative values for the foot posture index be- tween right and left foot: a descriptive study. Gait Posture 2013;38:843-6.
  11. Mazaheri M, Salavati M, Negahban H, Sohani SM, Taghizadeh F, Feizi A, et al. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010;18:755-9.
  12. Baumhauer JF, Nawoczenski DA, DiGiovanni BF, Wild- ing GE. Reliability and validity of the American Ortho- paedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating Scale: a pilot study for the hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 2006;27:1014-9.
  13. Mickle KJ, Munro BJ, Lord SR, Menz HB, Steele JR.