Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 3

The effect of simple local resection on pain and scoliotic curve in patients with scoliosis secondary to osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma in the spine

Pages
330–338
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The preoperative mean Visual Analog Scale score was 9 before the treatment and 0 at the final follow-up.Conclusion: Our results suggested that simple en bloc resection may be a safe and effective treatment option in patients with scoliosis secondary to spinal osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma, if patient less than 16 years, with major Cobb angle less than 40°, and duration of complaint less than 22 months.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was assess the results of local resection without instrumentation in patients with scoliosis secondary to spinal osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma.Methods: The review of our database revealed 176 cases of osteoid osteomas and 18 of osteoblastomas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Painful scoliosis was seen in 5 out of 6 cases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The preoperative mean Visual Analog Scale score was 9 before the treatment and 0 at the final follow-up.Conclusion: Our results suggested that simple en bloc resection may be a safe and effective treatment option in patients with scoliosis secondary to spinal osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma, if patient less than 16 years, with major Cobb angle less than 40°, and duration of complaint less than 22 months.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was assess the results of local resection without instrumentation in patients with scoliosis secondary to spinal osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma.Methods: The review of our database revealed 176 cases of osteoid osteomas and 18 of osteoblastomas. Painful scoliosis was seen in 5 out of 6 cases. The lesion was found on the posterior part of the apical vertebra in the concave side of the scoliotic curve. Surgical treatment consisted of simple en bloc excision. Mean period between diagnosis and operation was 2.6 years, mean age at the time of surgery was 12.5 years, and mean preoperative major Cobb angle was 37.2°.Results: Four patients with a mean follow-up of 4.3 years were included in the study. At final followup, Cobb angle was 7.6°, and the average percentage of correction was 79.6%. Coronal decompensation was corrected by 87.7%. Pelvic tilt and shoulder imbalance were corrected by 15% and 74.5%, respectively. The preoperative mean Visual Analog Scale score was 9 before the treatment and 0 at the final follow-up.Conclusion: Our results suggested that simple en bloc resection may be a safe and effective treatment option in patients with scoliosis secondary to spinal osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma, if patient less than 16 years, with major Cobb angle less than 40°, and duration of complaint less than 22 months.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALIOGLU, M. B., ALBAYRAK, A., ATICI, Y., SÖKÜCÜ, S., TACAL, M. T., KAYGUSUZ, M. A. (2016). The effect of simple local resection on pain and scoliotic curve in patients with scoliosis secondary to osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma in the spine. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 3, 330–338. https://ajindex.com/articles/353541

References (16)

  1. Koh JS, Chang UK, Haddix T. Extradural benign tumors. In: Kim DH, Chang UK, Kim SH, Bilsky MH, editors. Tumors of the spine. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, Elsevier; 2008. p. 5-7.
  2. Greenspan A, Remagen W. Differential diagnosis of tu- mors and tumor-like lesions of bones and joints. Benign lesions. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven; 1998. p. 25-122.
  3. Swee RG, McLeod RA, Beabout JW. Osteoid osteo- ma. Detection, diagnosis, and localization. Radiology 1979;130:117-23.
  4. Berry M, Mankin H, Gebhardt M, Rosenberg A, Horn- icek F. Osteoblastoma: a 30-year study of 99 cases. J Surg Oncol 2008;98:179-83.
  5. Schajowicz F, Lemos C. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblasto- ma. Closely related entities of osteoblastic derivation. Acta Orthop Scand 1970;41:272-91.
  6. Jackson RP, Reckling FW, Mants FA. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Similar histologic lesions with different nat- ural histories. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;128:303-13. Greenspan A. Benign bone-forming lesions: osteoma, osteoid osteoma, and osteoblastoma. Clinical, imaging, pathologic, and differential considerations. Skeletal Radiol 1993;22:485-500.
  7. Unni KK, Inwards CY. Introduction and scope of study, In: Dahlin's Bone Tumors: General Aspects and Data on 10,165 Cases. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
  8. Eggel Y, Theumann N, Lüthi F. Intra-articular osteoid os- teoma of the knee: clinical and therapeutical particularities. Joint Bone Spine 2007;74:379-81.
  9. Healey JH, Ghelman B. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblas- toma. Current concepts and recent advances. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;204:76-85.
  10. Keim HA, Reina EG. Osteoid-osteoma as a cause of sco- liosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:159-63.
  11. Saifuddin A, White J, Sherazi Z, Shaikh MI, Natali C, Ransford AO. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine. Factors associated with the presence of scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:47-53.
  12. Akbarnia BA, Rooholamini SA. Scoliosis caused by be- nign osteoblastoma of the thoracic or lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:1146-55.
  13. Boriani S, Capanna R, Donati D, Levine A, Picci P, Sa- vini R. Osteoblastoma of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;278:37-45.
  14. Marsh BW, Bonfiglio M, Brady LP, Enneking WF. Benign osteoblastoma: range of manifestations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:1-9.
  15. Azouz EM, Kozlowski K, Marton D, Sprague P, Zerhouni A, Asselah F. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine in children. Report of 22 cases with brief literature review. Pediatr Radiol 1986;16:25-31.
  16. Ozaki T, Liljenqvist U, Hillma