Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Determination of the hip rotation centre from landmarks in pelvic radiograph

Pages
470–473
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show thatthese proposed ratios can be used in THA planning, regardless of gender in the Turkish populationLevel of evidence: Level IV, diagnostic study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The hip rotation centre (HRC) is an important reference point in cases of total hip arthroplasty(THA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to investigate the reference points in the Turkish population that enablethe identiŞcation of the HRC in standard pelvic radiographs.Methods: The pelvic radiographs of 50 women and 50 men were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show thatthese proposed ratios can be used in THA planning, regardless of gender in the Turkish populationLevel of evidence: Level IV, diagnostic study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The hip rotation centre (HRC) is an important reference point in cases of total hip arthroplasty(THA). The aim of this study is to investigate the reference points in the Turkish population that enablethe identiŞcation of the HRC in standard pelvic radiographs.Methods: The pelvic radiographs of 50 women and 50 men were examined. The mean age was 46.2(range; 18e91). Patients with deformity of the hip joint and non-standard pelvic radiograph due to hipflexion contracture were excluded from the study. The pelvic height (PH), the distance between the HRCand teardrop (HRC-Td), and the HRC and the line tangent tuber ischiadicums (HRC-TI) were measured.The ratio of HRC-Td and HRC-TI to PH were calculated. TheŞrst is called "the horizontal-HRC ratio" andthe second,"the vertical-HRC ratio".Results: Mean PH was 239 (±13.58) mm in males and 225 (±12.52) in females (p < 0.0001). The distancesof HRC-TI were 71 (±6.35) and 65 (±6.72) mm (p < 0.0001) and the distance of HRC-Td were 34 (±3.73)and 30 (±4.05) mm (p ¼ 0.0007), respectively. The vertical-HRC ratios were 30.01% (±2.05) for males,29.10% (±2.35) for females, the horizontal-HRC ratio, 14.25% (±1.42) and 13.69% (±1.38), respectively(p> 0.05).Conclusion: Although the quantitative values obtained in the present study differ between the genders,the ratios ("vertical-HRC" and "horizontal-HRC") are comparable in both sexes. The results show thatthese proposed ratios can be used in THA planning, regardless of gender in the Turkish populationLevel of evidence: Level IV, diagnostic study.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOMBACI, H., SİMSEK, B., SOYARSLAN, M., YİLDİRİM, M. M. (2026). Determination of the hip rotation centre from landmarks in pelvic radiograph. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 470–473. https://ajindex.com/articles/353518

References (14)

  1. Bicanic G, Delimar D, Delimar M, Peciina M. Influence of the acetabular cup position on hip load during arthroplasty in hip dysplasia. Int Orthop. 2009;33: 397e402
  2. Kelley SS. High hip center in revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9: 503e510
  3. Lecerf G, Fessy MH, Philippot R, et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:210e219. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.010
  4. Nawabi DH, MeftahM, Nam D, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Durable fixation achieved with medialized, high hip center cementless THAs for crowe II and III dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013.
  5. Cassidy KA, Noticewala MS, Macaulay W, Lee JH, Geller JA. Effect of femoral offset on pain and function after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27: 1863e1869.
  6. Bell AL, Pedersen D, Brand RA. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. J Biomech. 1990;23:617e621
  7. Pierchon F, Migaud H, Duquennoy A, Fontaine C. Evaluation radiologique du centre de rotation de la hanche. Rev Chir Orthop. 1993;79:281e287
  8. Ranawat CS, Dorr LD, Inglis AE. Total hip arthroplasty in protrusion acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:1059e1065
  9. O'Sullivan GS, Goodman SB, Jones HH. Computerized tomographic evaluation of acetabular anatomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;277:175e181
  10. Durand-Hill M, Henckel J, Satchithananda K, et al. Calculating the hip center of rotation using contralateral pelvic anatomy. J Orthop Res. 2016;J34:1077e1083.
  11. Hirakawa K, Mitsugi N, Koshino T, Saito T, Hirasawa Y. Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2001;388:135e142
  12. Olmedo-Garcia N, Loez-Prats F, Agullo A, Ortuno A, Palazon A. A comparative study of the accuracy of Ranawat's and Pierccon's methods to determine the centre of rotation in bilateral coxopathy. Skelet Radiol. 2000;29:652e655
  13. Patriquin ML, Steyn M, Loth SR. Metric analysis of sex differences in South African black and white pelves. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147:119e127. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.074
  14. Sakalkale DP, Sharkey PF, Eng K, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Ortho