Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2018 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4

Tourniquet pressure settings based on limb occlusion pressure determination or arterial occlusion pressure estimation in total knee arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized, double blind trial

Pages
256–260
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No complications that could be related to the tourniquet were observed during orafter surgery.Conclusion: Tourniquet inflation pressure setting based on AOP estimation method provides a bloodlesssurgical field that is comparable to that of LOP determination method with lower pneumatic inflationpressure and less required time for cuff pressure adjustment in adult patients undergoing total kneearthroplasty under combined spinal epidural anesthesia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the limb occlusion pressure (LOP) determination andarterial occlusion pressure (AOP) estimation methods for tourniquet pressure setting in adult patientsundergoing knee arthroplasty under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.Methods: Ninety-three patients were randomized into two groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pneumatic tourniquet inflationpressures were adjusted based either on LOP determination or AOP estimation in Group 1 (46 patients,38 female and 8 male; mean age: 67.71 ± 9.17) and Group 2 (47 patients, 40 female and 7 male; meanage: 70.31 ± 8.27), respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No complications that could be related to the tourniquet were observed during orafter surgery.Conclusion: Tourniquet inflation pressure setting based on AOP estimation method provides a bloodlesssurgical field that is comparable to that of LOP determination method with lower pneumatic inflationpressure and less required time for cuff pressure adjustment in adult patients undergoing total kneearthroplasty under combined spinal epidural anesthesia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the limb occlusion pressure (LOP) determination andarterial occlusion pressure (AOP) estimation methods for tourniquet pressure setting in adult patientsundergoing knee arthroplasty under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.Methods: Ninety-three patients were randomized into two groups. Pneumatic tourniquet inflationpressures were adjusted based either on LOP determination or AOP estimation in Group 1 (46 patients,38 female and 8 male; mean age: 67.71 ± 9.17) and Group 2 (47 patients, 40 female and 7 male; meanage: 70.31 ± 8.27), respectively. Initial and maximal systolic blood pressures, LOP/AOP levels, requiredtime to estimate AOP/determinate LOP and set the cuff pressure, initial and maximal tourniquetpressures and tourniquet time were recorded. The effectiveness of the tourniquet was assessed by theorthopedic surgeons using a Likert scale.Results: Initial and maximal systolic blood pressures, determined LOP, estimated AOP, duration oftourniquet and the performance of the tourniquet were not different between groups. However,the initial (182.44 ± 14.59 mm Hg vs. 200.69 ± 15.55 mm Hg) and maximal tourniquet pressures(186.91 ± 12.91 mm Hg vs. 200.69 ± 15.55 mm Hg) were significantly lower, the time required to estimateAOP and set the tourniquet cuff pressure was significantly less (23.91 ± 4.77 s vs. 178.81 ± 25.46 s)in Group II (p ¼ 0.000). No complications that could be related to the tourniquet were observed during orafter surgery.Conclusion: Tourniquet inflation pressure setting based on AOP estimation method provides a bloodlesssurgical field that is comparable to that of LOP determination method with lower pneumatic inflationpressure and less required time for cuff pressure adjustment in adult patients undergoing total kneearthroplasty under combined spinal epidural anesthesia.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNCALI, B., BOYA, H., KAYHAN, Z., ARAÇ, Ş. (2018). Tourniquet pressure settings based on limb occlusion pressure determination or arterial occlusion pressure estimation in total knee arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized, double blind trial. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4, 256–260. https://ajindex.com/articles/353512

References (16)

  1. Noordin S, McEwen JA, Kragh Jr JF, Eisen A, Masri BA. Surgical tourniquets in orthopaedics. J Bone Jointt Surg Am. 2009
  2. 2958e2967. Odinsson A, Finsen V. Tourniquet use and its complications in Norway. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006
  3. 1090e1092. Olivecrona C, Ponzer S, Hamberg P, Blomfeldt R. Lower tourniquet cuff pressure reduces postoperative wound complications after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study of 164 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012
  4. 2216e2221. Olivecrona C, Blomfeldt R, Ponzer S, Stanford BR, Nilsson BY. Tourniquet cuff pressure and nerve injury in knee arthroplasty in a bloodless field: a neurophysiological study. Acta Orthop. 2013
  5. 159e164. Brin YS, Feldman V, Ron Gal I, Markushevitch M, Regev A, Stern A. The sterile elastic exsanguination tourniquet vs. the pneumatic tourniquet for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015
  6. 595e599. Drolet BC, Okhah Z, Phillips BZ, et al. Evidence for safe tourniquet use in 500 consecutive upper extremity procedures. Hand (N Y). 2014
  7. 494e498. Tejwani NC, Immerman I, Achan P, Egol KA, McLaurin T. Tourniquet cuff pressure: the gulf between science and practice. J Trauma. 2006
  8. 1415e1418. Pauers RS, Carocci MA. Low pressure pneumatic tourniquets: effectiveness at minimum recommended inflation pressures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1994
  9. 605e609. Shaw JA, Murray DG. The relationship between tourniquet pressure and underlying soft-tissue pressure in the thigh. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982
  10. 1148e1152. McLaren AC, Rorabeck CH. The pressure distribution under tourniquets. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985
  11. 433e438. Hargens AR, McClure AG, Skyhar MJ, Lieber RL, Gershuni DH, Akeson WH. Local compression patterns beneath pneumatic tourniquets applied to arms and thighs of human cadavera. J Orthop Res. 1987
  12. 247e252. Graham B, Breault MJ, McEwen JA, McGraw RW. Perineural pressures under the pneumatic tourniquet in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Br. 1992
  13. 262e266. Estebe JP, Davies JM, Richebe P. The pneumatic tourniquet: mechanical, ischaemia-reperfusion and systemic effects. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011
  14. 404e411. Estersohn HS, Sourifman HA. The minimum effective midthigh tourniquet pressure. J Foot Surg. 1982
  15. 281e284. Newman RJ, Muirhead A. A safe and effective low pressure tourniquet. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1986
  16. 625e628. Sadri A, Braithwaite IJ, Abdul-Jabar HB, Sarraf KM. Understanding of intraoperative tourniquets amongst orthopedic surgeons and theatre staf