Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2018 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of different electrotherapy methods and exercise therapy in shoulder impingement syndrome: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Pages
249–255
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, interferential current treatment showed significantlybetter outcomes for the mental component of quality of life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effects of different electrotherapymethods and exercise therapy on pain, function and quality of life in shoulder impingement syndrome.Methods: Eighty-three patients (66 females, 17 males; mean age: 48.2 ± 7.33 years) with shoulderimpingement syndrome were selected and 79 of them were randomly allocated into four groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group 1(n ¼ 19, mean age: 47.89 ± 7.12 years) was given hot pack and exercises, Group 2 (n ¼ 20, mean age:47.70 ± 6.51 years) was given hot packs, exercises and interferential current, Group 3 (n ¼ 20, mean age:48.50 ± 8.34 years) was given hot packs, exercises and TENS and Group 4 (n ¼ 20, mean age: 48.55 ± 7.89years) was given hot packs, exercises and ultrasound three times a week for four weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, interferential current treatment showed significantlybetter outcomes for the mental component of quality of life.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effects of different electrotherapymethods and exercise therapy on pain, function and quality of life in shoulder impingement syndrome.Methods: Eighty-three patients (66 females, 17 males; mean age: 48.2 ± 7.33 years) with shoulderimpingement syndrome were selected and 79 of them were randomly allocated into four groups. Group 1(n ¼ 19, mean age: 47.89 ± 7.12 years) was given hot pack and exercises, Group 2 (n ¼ 20, mean age:47.70 ± 6.51 years) was given hot packs, exercises and interferential current, Group 3 (n ¼ 20, mean age:48.50 ± 8.34 years) was given hot packs, exercises and TENS and Group 4 (n ¼ 20, mean age: 48.55 ± 7.89years) was given hot packs, exercises and ultrasound three times a week for four weeks. Assessments weremade before treatment, right after it and three months after that using the visual analog scale (VAS), ShortForm-36 (SF-36) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measures.Results: At the fourth week and third month assessments, all groups showed significant improvementsin terms of pain, DASH and SF-36 physical component scores (p 0.05).Conclusion: Application of ultrasound, interferential current and TENS in addition to exercise therapy inshoulder impingement syndrome treatment had similar improvements in terms of pain, function andphysical component of quality of life. However, interferential current treatment showed significantlybetter outcomes for the mental component of quality of life.

🔖

Cite This Article

UÇURUM, S. G., KAYA, D. Ö., KAYALI, Y., AŞKIN, A., TEKİNDAL, M. A. (2018). Comparison of different electrotherapy methods and exercise therapy in shoulder impingement syndrome: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4, 249–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/353511

References (3)

  1. Akman S, Küçükkaya M. Subacromial impingement syndrome: pathogenesis, clinical features, and examination methods. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2003;37(Suppl 1):27e34. Thornton LA, McCarty CM, Burgess MJ. Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy combined with an exercise program to reduce pain and increase function in adults with shoulder pain: a critically appraised topic. J Sport Rehabil. 2013;22(1):72e78. Huang H, Lin J, Guo YL, Wang WTJ, Chen YJ. EMG biofeedback effectiveness to alter muscle activity pattern and scapular Kinematics in subjects with and without shoulder impingement. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013;23(1):267e274. Chester R, Smith TO, Hooper L, Dixon J. The impact of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome on muscle activity patterns of the shoulder complex: a systematic review of electromyographic studies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11(45):1e12. Cakmak A. Conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2003;37(Suppl 1):112e118. Cools MA, Johansson FR, Borms D, Maenhout A. Prevention of shoulder injuries in overhead athletes: a science-based approach. Braz J Phys Ther. 2015;19(5): 331e339. Celik D, Sirmen B, Demirhan M. The relationship of muscle strength and pain in subacromial impingement syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2011;45(2): 79e84. Morrison DS, Greenbaum BS, Einhorn A. Shoulder impingement. Orthop Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;31(2):285e293. Aytar A. Subakromial Sıkıs¸ ma Sendromu Konservatif Tedavi. In: Baltacı G, ed. Omuz Yaralanmalarında Rehabilitasyon. Ankara: Pelikan Yayıncılık; 2015.
  2. Calis HT, Berberoglu N, Calis M. Are ultrasound, laser and exercise superior to each other in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome? Randomized clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;47(3):375e380. Yavuz F, Duman I, Taskaynatan MA, Tan KA. Low-level laser therapy versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(3):15e320. Dong W, Goost H, Lin XB, et al. Treatments for shoulder impingement syndrome. Medicine. 2015;94(10):1e17. e510. Yuruk O. Omuz Rehabilitasyonunda Kullanılan Fiziksel Ajanlar ve Elektroterapi Yontemleri. In: Baltac € ı G, ed. Omuz Yaralanmalarında Rehabilitasyon. Ankara: Pelikan Yayıncılık; 2015.
  3. Van Der Heijden GJ, Leffers P, Wolters PJ, et al. No effect of bipolar interferential electrotherapy and pulsed ultrasound for soft tissue shoulder disorders: a randomised controlled trial.